Semantic sentiment analysis of twitter

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7649 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2012, Pages 508-524

  Saif, Hassan ^a   He, Yulan ^a   Alani, Harith ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

feature interpolation; semantic concepts; Sentiment analysis

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

F-SCORE; NEGATIVE SENTIMENTS; PART OF SPEECH; SEMANTIC CONCEPT; SEMANTIC FEATURES; SENTIMENT CLASSIFICATION; TOPIC ANALYSIS; TRAINING SETS;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 84868588570     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35176-1_32     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Agarwal, A., Xie, B., Vovsha, I., Rambow, O., Passonneau, R.: Sentiment analysis of twitter data. In: Proc. ACL 2011 Workshop on Languages in Social Media, pp. 30-38 (2011)
2. Barbosa, L., Feng, J.: Robust sentiment detection on twitter from biased and noisy data. In: Proceedings of COLING, pp. 36-44 (2010)
3. Gimpel, K., Schneider, N., O'Connor, B., Das, D., Mills, D., Eisenstein, J., Heilman, M., Yogatama, D., Flanigan, J., Smith, N.: Part-of-speech tagging for twitter: Annotation, features, and experiments. Tech. rep., DTIC Document (2010)
4. Go, A., Bhayani, R., Huang, L.: Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision. CS224N Project Report, Stanford (2009)
5. Guerra, P., Veloso, A., Meira Jr., W., Almeida, V.: From bias to opinion: A transfer-learning approach to real-time sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD (2011)
6. Kouloumpis, E., Wilson, T., Moore, J.: Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad and the omg! In: Proceedings of the ICWSM (2011)
7. Lin, C., He, Y.: Joint sentiment/topic model for sentiment analysis. In: Proceeding of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 375-384. ACM (2009)
8. Moschitti, A.: Efficient Convolution Kernels for Dependency and Constituent Syntactic Trees. In: Furnkranz, J., Scheffer, T., Spiliopoulou, M. (eds.) ECML 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4212, pp. 318-329. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
9. Pak, A., Paroubek, P.: Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Proceedings of LREC 2010 (2010)
10. Rizzo, G., Troncy, R.: Nerd: Evaluating named entity recognition tools in the web of data. In: Workshop on Web Scale Knowledge Extraction (WEKEX 2011), vol. 21 (2011)
11. Saif, H., He, Y., Alani, H.: Semantic Smoothing for Twitter Sentiment Analysis. In: Proceeding of the 10th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC (2011)
12. Saif, H., He, Y., Alani, H.: Alleviating Data Sparsity for Twitter Sentiment Analysis. In: Proceedings, 2nd Workshop on Making Sense of Microposts (#MSM 2012): Big Things Come in Small Packages: in Conjunction with WWW(2012)
13. Shamma, D., Kennedy, L., Churchill, E.: Tweet the debates: understanding community annotation of uncollected sources. In: Proceedings of the First SIGMM Workshop on Social Media, pp. 3-10. ACM (2009)
14. Speriosu, M., Sudan, N., Upadhyay, S., Baldridge, J.: Twitter polarity classification with label propagation over lexical links and the follower graph. In: Proceedings of the EMNLP FirstWorkshop on Unsupervised Learning in NLP, pp. 53-63 (2011)
15. Tan, C., Lee, L., Tang, J., Jiang, L., Zhou, M., Li, P.:User-level sentiment analysis incorporating social networks. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD (2011)
16. Yu, B.: An evaluation of text classification methods for literary study. Literary and Linguistic Computing 23(3), 327-343 (2008)