Land cover/use classification using optical and quad polarization radar imagery

American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Annual Conference 2009, ASPRS 2009

Volumn 2, Issue , 2009, Pages 760-770

  Sheoran, Arjun ^a   Haack, Barry ^a   Sawaya, Salim ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CALIFORNIA; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; DATA SETS; EUCLIDEAN DISTANCE; LAND COVER; LAND COVER/USE; LANDSAT; LANDSAT TM; LAYER STACKING; MULTI-SENSOR FUSION TECHNIQUES; POLARIZATION RADARS; RADAR DATA; SIGNATURE EXTRACTION; SINGLE POLARIZATION; SINGLE WAVELENGTH; SPACE-BORNE; SPACEBORNE RADAR; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; WINDOW SIZE;

HIGHER ORDER STATISTICS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; POLARIZATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RADAR IMAGING; REMOTE SENSING; SENSOR DATA FUSION; TEXTURES; TRACKING RADAR;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84868582850     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Anys, H. and D. He, 1995. Evaluation of textural and multipolarization radar features for crop classification, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 33 (5): 1170-1181.
2. Banner, A.V. and F. J. Ahern, 1995. Incident angle effects on the interpretability of forest clearcuts using airborne C-HH SAR imagery, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 2, (1): 64-66.
3. Brisco, B., and R.J. Brown, 1999. Mulitdate SAR/TM synergism for crop classification in Western Canada, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 61 (8): 1009-1014.
4. Campbell, J.B., 2002. Introduction to Remote Sensing, New York, NY: Guilford, pp 214-215.
5. Chavez, P.S., S.C. Sides, and J.A. Anderson, 1991. Comparison of three different methods to merge multiresolution and multispectral data Landsat TM and SPOT Panchromatic, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57(3): 295-303.
6. Dell'Acqua, F., P. Gamba, and G. Lisini, 2003. Improvements to urban area characterization using multitemporal and multiangle SAR images, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41 (9): 1996-2004.
7. Gauthier, Y., M. Bernier, and J.P. Fortin, 1998. Aspect and incident angle sensitivity in ERS-1 SAR data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19 (10): 2001-2006.
8. Haack, B., E. Solomon, M. Bechdol, and N. Herold, 2002. Radar and optical data comparison/integration for urban delineation: A case study, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 68 (12): 1289-1296.
9. Herold, N., 2000. Integration of radar and optical data for land cover classification in the presence of speckle noise, Thesis, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
10. Hegarat-Mascle, S., Vidal-Madjar, D., Taconet, O. and M. Zribi, 1997, "Application of shannon information theory to a comparison between L- and C-band SIR polarimetric data versus incident angle," Remote Sensing of Environment, 60 (2): 121-130.
11. Henderson, F., R. Chasan, J. Portolese, and T. Hart, Jr., 2002. Evaluation of SAR-optical imagery synthesis techniques in a complex coastal ecosystem, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 68 (8): 839-846.
12. Herold, N., B.N. Haack, and E. Solomon, 2005. Radar spatial considerations for land cover extraction, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26 (7): 1383-1401.
13. Huang, H., J. Legarsky, and J. Othman, 2007. Land-cover classification using Radarsat and Landsat imagery for St. Louis, Missouri, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 73(1): 37-43.
14. Kurosu, T., S. Uratsuka, H. Maeno, and T. Kozu, 1999. Texture statistics for classification of land use with multitemporal JERS-1 SAR single-look imagery, IEEE Transactions on Geosciences and Remote Sensing, 37 (1): 227-235.
15. Leckie, D.G., 1990. Synergism of synthetic aperture radar and visible/infrared data for forest type discrimination, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 56(9): 1237-1246.
16. Nyoungui, A., E. Tonye, and A. Alono, 2002. Evaluation of speckle filtering and texture analysis methods for land cover classification from SAR images, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(9): 1895-1925.
17. Pal, S.K., T.J. Majumdar, and A.K. Bhattachrya, 2007. ERS-2SAR and IRS-IC LISS III data fusion: A PCA approach to improve remote sensing based geological interpretation, Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 60(5): 281-297.
18. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2007. National agricultural statistics service, California cropland data layer (CDL).
19. Raghavswamy, V., N.C. Gautam, M. Padmavathi, and K.V. Badarinath, 1996. Studies on microwave remote sensing data in conjunction with optical data for land use/land cover mapping and assessment, Geocarto International, 11(4): 25-30.
20. Saraf, A.K., 1999. IRS-IC-LISS-III and PAN data fusion: an approach to improve remote sensing based mapping techniques, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(10): 1929-1934.
21. Schistad, A., A. Jain, and T. Taxt, 1994. Multisource classification of remotely sensed data: fusion of Landsat TM and SAR images, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32(4): 768-778.
22. Sheoran, A., B.N. Haack, T. Idol, and S. Sawaya, 2007. Land use/cover mapping comparison of optical and quad polarization radar imagery, International Journal of Remote Sensing (In review).
23. Solber, A.H.S. and K.J. Anil, 1997. Texture fusion and feature selection applied to SAR imagery, IEEE Transactions on Geosciences and Remote Sensing, 10 (6): 989-1003.
24. Townsend, P.A., 2002. Estimating forest structure in wetlands using multitemporal SAR, Remote Sensing of Environment, 79: 288-304.
25. Toyra, J., A. Pietroniro and L. Martz, 2001. Multisensor hydrologic assessment of a freshwater wetland, Remote Sensing of Environment, 75: 162-173.
26. Zhang, L., Y. Zhao, B. Huang, and P. Li, 2008. Texture feature fusion with neighborhood oscillating tabular search for high resolution image classification, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 74(3): 323-331.