Evaluating entity summarization using a game-based ground truth

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7650 LNCS, Issue PART 2, 2012, Pages 350-361

  Thalhammer, Andreas ^a   Knuth, Magnus ^b   Sack, Harald ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

entity summarization; evaluation; games with a purpose; linked data; property ranking

Indexed keywords

DATA HANDLING; LINKED DATA; QUALITY CONTROL;

ENTITY SUMMARIZATION; EVALUATION; GAME-BASED APPROACHES; GAMES WITH A PURPOSE; NON-TECHNICAL USERS; OBJECTIVE EVALUATION; PROPERTY RANKING; SEMANTIC WEB RESEARCH;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 84868579668     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35173-0_24     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Amigo, E., Gonzalo, J., Penas, A., Verdejo, F.: Qarla: a framework for the evaluation of text summarization systems. In: Proc. of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2005, pp. 280-289. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2005)
2. Cantador, I., Brusilovsky, P., Kuflik, T.: 2nd ws. on information heterogeneity and fusion in recommender systems (hetrec 2011). In: Proc. of 5th ACM Conf. on Recommender systems, RecSys 2011. ACM, New York (2011)
3. Cheng, G., Tran, T., Qu, Y.: RELIN: Relatedness and Informativeness-Based Centrality for Entity Summarization. In: Aroyo, L., Welty, C., Alani, H., Taylor, J., Bernstein, A., Kagal, L., Noy, N., Blomqvist, E. (eds.) ISWC 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7031, pp. 114-129. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
4. comScore. comscore reports global search market growth of 46 percent in 2009 (2010), http://www.comscore.com/Press Events/Press Releases/2010/1/ Global Search Market Grows 46 Percent in 2009
5. Dunning, T.: Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics 19(1), 61-74 (1993)
6. Luhn, H.P.: The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM J. Res. Dev. 2(2), 159-165 (1958)
7. Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In: Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on World Wide Web, WWW 2001, pp. 285-295. ACM, New York (2001)
8. Singhal, A.: Introducing the knowledge graph: things, not strings (2012), http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2012/05/introducing-knowledge-graphthings-not. html
9. Thalhammer, A., Toma, I., Roa-Valverde, A.J., Fensel, D.: Leveraging usage data for linked data movie entity summarization. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int. Ws. on Usage Analysis and the Web of Data (USEWOD 2012) co-located with WWW 2012, Lyon, France, vol. abs/1204.2718 (2012)
10. Waitelonis, J., Ludwig, N., Knuth, M., Sack, H.: WhoKnows?-evaluating linked data heuristics with a quiz that cleans up DBpedia. Int. Journal of Interactive Technology and Smart Education (ITSE) 8(3), 236-248 (2011)
11. Waitelonis, J., Sack, H.: Towards exploratory video search using linked data. Multimedia Tools and Applications 59, 645-672 (2012), 10.1007/s11042-011- 0733-1