Towards an automatic parameterization of ontology matching tools based on example mappings

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 814, Issue , 2011, Pages 260-261

  Ritze, Dominique ^a   Paulheim, Heiko ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^b DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDING BLOCKES; DATA SETS; END USERS; NON-TRIVIAL TASKS; ONTOLOGY MAPPING; ONTOLOGY MATCHING; PARAMETER SETTING;

ONTOLOGY;

MAPPING;

EID: 84868562627     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. A. Doan, P. Domingos, and A. Halevy. Reconciling schemas of disparate data sources: A machine-learning approach. In Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pages 509-520, 2001.
2. Felix Dobslaw. Automatic parameter tuning for metaheuristics, 2010. Accessed June 17th, 2011.
3. Kai Eckert, Christian Meilicke, and Heiner Stuckenschmidt. Improving ontology matching using meta-level learning. In Proceedings of the 6th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), pages 158-172, 2009.
4. M. Ehrig, S. Staab, and Y. Sure. Bootstrapping ontology alignment methods with apfel. In Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), pages 186-200, 2005.
5. Marc Ehrig and Steffen Staab. Qom - quick ontology mapping. In The Semantic Web - ISWC 2004, volume 3298, pages 683-697. Springer, 2004. (Pubitemid 39743916)
6. Jérôme Euzenat, Alfio Ferrara, Laura Hollink, Antoine Isaac, Cliff Joslyn, Véronique Malaisé, Christian Meilicke, Andriy Nikolov, Juan Pane, Marta Sabou, François Scharffe, Pavel Shvaiko, Vassilis Spiliopoulos, Heiner Stuckenschmidt, Ondrej Sváb-Zamazal, Vojtech Svátek, Cássia Trojahn dos Santos, George A. Vouros, and Shenghui Wang. Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2009. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM-2009), volume 551 of CEUR-WS, 2009.
7. Jérôme Euzenat, Alfio Ferrara, Christian Meilicke, Juan Pane, François Scharffe, Pavel Shvaiko, Heiner Stuckenschmidt, Ondrej Sváb-Zamazal, Vojtech Svátek, and Cássia Trojahn. Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2010. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM-2010), volume 689 of CEUR-WS, 2010.
8. Jérôme Euzenat and Pavel Shvaiko. Ontology Matching. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2007.
9. M.W. Gardner and S.R. Dorling. Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron) - a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences. Atmospheric Environment, 32(14-15):2627-2636, 1998. (Pubitemid 28351824)
10. Zong Woo Geem, Joong-Hoon Kim, and G. V. Loganathan. A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony search. Simulation, 76(2):60-68, 2001. (Pubitemid 32543074)
11. John H. Holland. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press, 1975.
12. Wei Hu and Yuzhong Qu. Falcon-AO: A practical ontology matching system. Journal of Web Semantics, 6(3), 2008.
13. Ryutaro Ichise. Machine learning approach for ontology mapping using multiple concept similarity measures. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), pages 340-346, 2008.
14. Yannis Kalfoglou and Bo Hu. CROSI Mapping System (CMS) - Result of the 2005 Ontology Alignment Contest. In Integrating Ontologies '05, Proceedings of the K-CAP 2005 Workshop on Integrating Ontologies, Banff, Canada, October 2, 2005, 2005.
15. Patrick Lambrix and Qiang Liu. Using partial reference alignments to align ontologies. In Proceedings of the 6th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), pages 188-202, 2009.
16. Yoonkyong Lee, Mayssam Sayyadian, AnHai Doan, and Arnon S. Rosenthal. eTuner: tuning schema matching software using synthetic scenarios. VLDB Journal: Very Large Data Bases, 16(1):97-122, 2007. (Pubitemid 44655854)
17. Sean Luke. Essentials of Metaheuristics. Lulu, 2009.
18. Malgorzata Mochol, Anja Jentzsch, and Jérôme Euzenat. Applying an analytic method for matching approach selection. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM-2006), 2006.
19. Natalya F. Noy and Mark A. Musen. The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(6):983-1024, 2003.
20. J. R. Quinlan. Learning with continuous classes. In Proceedings of the 5th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 343-348, 1992.
21. S. Russel and P. Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: a Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall, 1995.
22. Pavel Shvaiko and Jérôme Euzenat. Ten Challenges for Ontology Matching. In On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2008, volume 5332 of LNCS, pages 1164-182. Springer, 2008.
23. R. Storn and K. Price. Differential evolution - a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of global optimization, 11:341-359, 1997. (Pubitemid 127502202)
24. Ondrej Sváb and Vojtech Svátek. Combining ontology mapping methods using bayesian networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM), volume 225, pages 206-210, 2006.
25. Peng Wang and Baowen Xu. Lily: Ontology Alignment Results for OAEI 2009. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM-2009), 2009.
26. X.-S. Yang and S. Deb. Cuckoo search via lévy flights. In Proceedings of World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC 2009), pages 210-214, 2009.
27. Anna V. Zhdanova and Pavel Shvaiko. Community-driven ontology matching. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), pages 34-49, 2006. (Pubitemid 44071150)