Effective inter-residue contact definitions for accurate protein fold recognition

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Yuan, Chao ^a   Chen, Hao ^a   Kihara, Daisuke ^a,b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Purdue University   (United States)

Author keywords

Fold recognition; Protein fold; Protein structure prediction; Residue residue contact; Structural features; Threading

Indexed keywords

FOLD RECOGNITION; PROTEIN FOLDS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE PREDICTION; STRUCTURAL FEATURE; THREADING;

ALIGNMENT; PROTEIN FOLDING;

PROTEINS;

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOFTWARE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84868558712     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-292     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Hillisch A, Pineda LF, Hilgenfeld R. Utility of homology models in the drug discovery process. Drug Discov Today 2004, 9:659-669. 10.1016/S1359-6446(04)03196-4, 15279849.
2. Takeda-Shitaka M, Takaya D, Chiba C, Tanaka H, Umeyama H. Protein structure prediction in structure based drug design. Curr Med Chem 2004, 11:551-558. 10.2174/0929867043455837, 15032603.
3. Ashworth J, Havranek JJ, Duarte CM, Sussman D, Monnat RJ, Stoddard BL, Baker D. Computational redesign of endonuclease DNA binding and cleavage specificity. Nature 2006, 441:656-659. 10.1038/nature04818, 2999987, 16738662.
4. Jiang L, Althoff EA, Clemente FR, Doyle L, Rothlisberger D, Zanghellini A, Gallaher JL, Betker JL, Tanaka F, Barbas CF, Hilvert D, Houk KN, Stoddard BL, Baker D. De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science 2008, 319:1387-1391. 10.1126/science.1152692, 3431203, 18323453.
5. Saven JG. Computational protein design: engineering molecular diversity, nonnatural enzymes, nonbiological cofactor complexes, and membrane proteins. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2011, 15:452-457. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.03.014, 21493122.
6. Mardis ER. Next-generation DNA sequencing methods. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2008, 9:387-402. 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164359, 18576944.
7. Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies - the next generation. Nat Rev Genet 2010, 11:31-46. 10.1038/nrg2626, 19997069.
8. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28:235-242. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235, 102472, 10592235.
9. Pieper U, Eswar N, Davis FP, Braberg H, Madhusudhan MS, Rossi A, Marti-Renom M, Karchin R, Webb BM, Eramian D, Shen MY, Kelly L, Melo F, Sali A. MODBASE: a database of annotated comparative protein structure models and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:D291-D295. 10.1093/nar/gkj059, 1347422, 16381869.
10. Kihara D, Skolnick J. Microbial Genomes have over 72% structure assignment by the threading algorithm PROSPECTOR_Q. Proteins 2004, 55:464-473. 10.1002/prot.20044, 15048836.
11. Zhang Y. Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008, 18:342-348. 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.02.004, 2680823, 18436442.
12. Chen H, Kihara D. Effect of using suboptimal alignments in template-based protein structure prediction. Proteins 2011, 79:315-334. 10.1002/prot.22885, 3058269, 21058297.
13. Kinch L, Yong SS, Cong Q, Cheng H, Liao Y, Grishin NV. CASP9 assessment of free modeling target predictions. Proteins 2011, 79(Suppl 10):59-73. 3226891, 21997521.
14. Qu X, Swanson R, Day R, Tsai J. A guide to template based structure prediction. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2009, 10:270-285. 10.2174/138920309788452182, 19519455.
15. Liu S, Zhang C, Liang S, Zhou Y. Fold recognition by concurrent use of solvent accessibility and residue depth. Proteins 2007, 68:636-645. 10.1002/prot.21459, 17510969.
16. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Single-body residue-level knowledge-based energy score combined with sequence-profile and secondary structure information for fold recognition. Proteins 2004, 55:1005-1013. 10.1002/prot.20007, 15146497.
17. Skolnick J, Kihara D. Defrosting the frozen approximation: PROSPECTOR-a new approach to threading. Proteins 2001, 42:319-331. 10.1002/1097-0134(20010215)42:3<319::AID-PROT30>3.0.CO;2-A, 11151004.
18. Skolnick J, Kihara D, Zhang Y. Development and large scale benchmark testing of the PROSPECTOR 3.0 threading algorithm. Proteins 2004, 56:502-518. 10.1002/prot.20106, 15229883.
19. Adamczak R, Porollo A, Meller J. Combining prediction of secondary structure and solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins 2005, 59:467-475. 10.1002/prot.20441, 15768403.
20. Yang YD, Park C, Kihara D. Protein structure prediction without optimizing weighting factors for scoring function. Biophys J 2009, 96:653a.
21. Sippl MJ. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995, 5:229-235. 10.1016/0959-440X(95)80081-6, 7648326.
22. Skolnick J, Jaroszewski L, Kolinski A, Godzik A. Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding. When is the quasichemical approximation correct. Protein Sci 1997, 6:676-688. 2143667, 9070450.
23. Zhou H, Skolnick J. GOAP: a generalized orientation-dependent, all-atom statistical potential for protein structure prediction. Biophys J 2011, 101:2043-2052. 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.012, 3192975, 22004759.
24. Kihara D. The effect of long-range interactions on the secondary structure formation of proteins. Protein Sci 2005, 14:1955-1963. 10.1110/ps.051479505, 2279307, 15987894.
25. Taketomi H, Ueda Y, Go N. Studies on protein folding, unfolding and fluctuations by computer simulation. I. The effect of specific amino acid sequence represented by specific inter-unit interactions. Int J Pept Protein Res 1975, 7:445-459.
26. Vassura M, Di LP, Margara L, Mirto M, Aloisio G, Fariselli P, Casadio R. Blurring contact maps of thousands of proteins: what we can learn by reconstructing 3D structure. BioData Min 2011, 4:1. 10.1186/1756-0381-4-1, 3033854, 21232136.
27. Duarte JM, Sathyapriya R, Stehr H, Filippis I, Lappe M. Optimal contact definition for reconstruction of contact maps. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:283. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-283, 20507547.
28. Vendruscolo M, Kussell E, Domany E. Recovery of protein structure from contact maps. Fold Des 1997, 2:295-306. 10.1016/S1359-0278(97)00041-2, 9377713.
29. Li W, Zhang Y, Kihara D, Huang YJ, Zheng D, Montelione GT, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. TOUCHSTONEX: protein structure prediction with sparse NMR data. Proteins 2003, 53:290-306. 10.1002/prot.10499, 14517980.
30. Rodionov MA, Johnson MS. Residue-residue contact substitution probabilities derived from aligned three-dimensional structures and the identification of common folds. Protein Sci 1994, 3:2366-2377. 10.1002/pro.5560031221, 2142768, 7756991.
31. Li Y, Fang Y, Fang J. Predicting residue-residue contacts using random forest models. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:3379-3384. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr579, 22016406.
32. Shackelford G, Karplus K. Contact prediction using mutual information and neural nets. Proteins 2007, 69(Suppl 8):159-164.
33. Frenkel-Morgenstern M, Magid R, Eyal E, Pietrokovski S. Refining intra-protein contact prediction by graph analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8(Suppl 5):S6. 10.1186/1471-2105-8-S5-S6, 2230507, 18269700.
34. Cheng J, Baldi P. Improved residue contact prediction using support vector machines and a large feature set. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:113. 10.1186/1471-2105-8-113, 1852326, 17407573.
35. Hamilton N, Burrage K, Ragan MA, Huber T. Protein contact prediction using patterns of correlation. Proteins 2004, 56:679-684. 10.1002/prot.20160, 15281121.
36. Fariselli P, Olmea O, Valencia A, Casadio R. Prediction of contact maps with neural networks and correlated mutations. Protein Eng 2001, 14:835-843. 10.1093/protein/14.11.835, 11742102.
37. Vullo A, Walsh I, Pollastri G. A two-stage approach for improved prediction of residue contact maps. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:180. 10.1186/1471-2105-7-180, 1484494, 16573808.
38. Kihara D, Lu H, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. TOUCHSTONE: an ab initio protein structure prediction method that uses threading-based tertiary restraints. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001, 98:10125-10130. 10.1073/pnas.181328398, 56926, 11504922.
39. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. An empirical energy potential with a reference state for protein fold and sequence recognition. Proteins 1999, 36:357-369. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990815)36:3<357::AID-PROT10>3.0.CO;2-U, 10409829.
40. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Estimation of effective inter-residue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985, 18:534-552.
41. Gniewek P, Leelananda SP, Kolinski A, Jernigan RL, Kloczkowski A. Multibody coarse-grained potentials for native structure recognition and quality assessment of protein models. Proteins 2011, 79:1923-1929. 10.1002/prot.23015, 3093657, 21560165.
42. Krishnamoorthy B, Tropsha A. Development of a four-body statistical pseudo-potential to discriminate native from non-native protein conformations. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1540-1548. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg186, 12912835.
43. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:2302-2309. 10.1093/nar/gki524, 1084323, 15849316.
44. Hildebrand A, Remmert M, Biegert A, Soding J. Fast and accurate automatic structure prediction with HHpred. Proteins 2009, 77(Suppl 9):128-132.
45. Xu J, Zhang Y. How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:889-895. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq066, 2913670, 20164152.
46. Zemla A. LGA: A method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:3370-3374. 10.1093/nar/gkg571, 168977, 12824330.
47. Vehlow C, Stehr H, Winkelmann M, Duarte JM, Petzold L, Dinse J, Lappe M. CMView: interactive contact map visualization and analysis. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:1573-1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr163, 21471016.
48. Andreeva A, Howorth D, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE, Hubbard TJ, Chothia C, Murzin AG. Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:D419-D425. 2238974, 18000004.