A transportation corridor case study for multi-criteria decision analysis

American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Annual Conference 2009, ASPRS 2009

Volumn 2, Issue , 2009, Pages 703-714

  Sadasivuni, Raviraj ^a   O'Hara, Charles G ^a   Nobrega, Rodrigo ^a   Dumas, Jeramiah ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AHP METHOD; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; AUTOMATED APPROACH; COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS; CONFLICT RESOLUTION; COST SURFACES; CUMULATIVE COST; DECISION FACTORS; DECISION MAKERS; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; DECISION PROCESS; DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORKS; GEO-SPATIAL; GEOSPATIAL ANALYSIS; LEAST-COST PATHS; METROPOLITAN AREA; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON; PLANNING NEEDS; RELATIVE PRIORITIES; RELATIVE RANKINGS; STRUCTURED PROCESS; TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORS; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS; WEIGHTED FACTORS;

DECISION MAKING; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; OPERATIONS RESEARCH; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; REMOTE SENSING;

HIGHWAY PLANNING;

EID: 84868555601     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Chen, C-F., 2006. Applying the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach to Convention Site Selection, Journal of Travel Research, 45: 167 - 174.
2. Downs, A., 1994. New Visions for Metropolitan America, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
3. Hill, M.J., R. Braaten, B. Lees, S.M. Veitch and S. Sharma, 2005. Multi-criteria decision analysis in spatial decision support: the ASSESS analytic hierarchy process and the role of quantitative methods and spatially explicit analysis, Environmental Modeling and Software, 20, 955-976.
4. Kiker, G.A., Bridges T.S., Varghese A, Seager T.P., Linkov I., 2005. Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Vol. 2 95-108.
5. Laskar, A., 2003. Integrating GIS and Multi Criteria Decision Making Techniques for Land Resource Planning, International Inst. for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), Enschede (Netherlands).
6. Malczewski, J., 1999. GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis, Wiley, New York.
7. O'Hara, C.G., J. King, J. Cartwright, and R.L. King, 2003. Multitemporal Land Use and Land Cover Classification of Urbanized Area Within Sensitive Coastal Environments, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 41, No. 9, pp. 2005-2014.
8. Piantanakulchai, M., N. Saengkhao, 2003. Evaluation of alternatives in transportation planning using multi-stakeholders multi-objectives AHP modeling, In Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 4, 1613-1628.
9. Saaty, T.L., 1995. Transport planning with multiple criteria: the analytic hierarchy process applications and progress review, Journal of Advanced Transportation, 29(1): 81-126.
10. Saaty, T.L., 1994. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the AHP, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1994.
11. Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
12. Stefanakis, E., M. Kavouras, 2002. Navigating in space under constraints, International Journal of Pure Applied Mathematics, vol. 1, pp.71-93.
13. USDOT, 2006. I-69, Section of Independent Utility #9, Final Environmental Impact Statement, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, TNDOT and MSDOT.