Evaluation of PHEVs fuel efficiency and cost using Monte Carlo analysis

24th International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition 2009, EVS 24

Volumn 1, Issue , 2009, Pages 610-622

  Faron, Gregoire ^a   Pagerit, Sylvain ^a   Rousseau, Aymeric ^a  

^a ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost; Modeling; Monte Carlo; PHEV; Simulation

Indexed keywords

COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES; DRIVE CYCLES; FUEL EFFICIENCY; MONTE CARLO; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; PETROLEUM CONSUMPTION; PHEV; PLUG-IN HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLES; POWERTRAIN CONFIGURATION; SIMULATION; SINGLE-VALUE; TRIANGULAR DISTRIBUTION; UNCERTAINTY DISTRIBUTIONS;

COSTS; EFFICIENCY; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; EXHIBITIONS; FUEL CELLS; MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84868541298     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. A. Papageorgiou and G.W. Wasilkowski, On average case complexity of multivariate problems," Journal of Complexity, vol. 6, pp. 1-6, 1990
2. Morgan, M. G., and M. Henrion. Uncertainty - a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
3. Iman, R.L. and M.J. Shortencarier.. User's Guide for the Generation of Latin Hypercube and Random Samples for Use with Computer Models, querque, NM: Sandia National laboratories. NUREG/CR-3624, SAND83-2365. 1984
4. McKay, M.D., R.J. Beckman, and W.J. Conover. A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code, Technometrics. Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 239-245. 1979.
5. J. C. Helton and F. J. Davis, Latin Hypercube Sampling and the Propagation of uncertainty in Analyses of Complex Systems, Sandia National laboratories, 2002.
6. L. Chrisman, M. Henrion, and R. Morgan, Analytica user guide, release 4.0, 2007
7. Urmila M. Diwekar, A Novel Sampling Approach to Combinatorial Optimization Under Uncertainty, Computational Optimization and Applications, 24, 335-371, 2003.
8. H. Niederreiter. Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods, SIAM, CBMS 63, 1992.
9. Morokoff, W.J. (1998): Generating Quasi-Random Paths for Stochastic Processes, SIAM Review, vol.40, no 4, pp. 765-788, 1998
10. J.R. Kalgnanam and U.M. Diwekar, An efficient sampling technique for off-line quality control. Technometrics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 308-319, 1997.
11. William C. Snyder, Accuracy estimation for quasi-Monte Carlo simulations, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 54, 131-143, 2000.
12. Helton, J.C., Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Use in performance Assessment for Radioactive Waste Disposal, Reliability Engineering and System Safety. Vol. 42, no. 2-3, p. 327-367, 1993.