Identification enhancement of auditory evoked potentials in EEG by epoch concatenation and temporal decorrelation

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1097-1105

  Zavala Fernandez, H ^a,b   Orglmeister, R ^b   Trahms, L ^c   Sander, T H ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOCYBERNETICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING   (Poland)

^b TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^c PHYSIKALISCH TECHNISCHE BUNDESANSTALT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Blind source separation; EEG; Epoch concatenation; Event related potentials; Temporal decorrelation

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN ACTIVITY; BRAIN RESPONSE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMPUTATION TIME; EPOCH CONCATENATION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIALS; EXTERNAL STIMULUS; SHORT DURATIONS; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; TEMPORAL DECORRELATION;

ALGORITHMS; BLIND SOURCE SEPARATION; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EXPERIMENTS; SOUND RECORDING;

BIOELECTRIC POTENTIALS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CALCULATION; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPECTRUM; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TIME;

ALGORITHMS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS;

EID: 84868539996     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: 18727565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baillet S., Mosher J., Leahy R. Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2001, 18(6):14-30.
2. Malmivuo J., Plonsey R. Bioelectromagnetism 1995, Oxford University Press, New York.
3. Ivanitsky A., Nikolaev A., Ivanitsky G. Electroencephalography. Modern Techniques in Neuroscience Research 1999, 971-995. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (Chapter 35). U. Windhorst, H. Johansson (Eds.).
4. Blankertz B., Losch F., Krauledat M., Dornhege G., Curio G., Müller K. The Berlin brain-computer interface: accurate performance from first-session in BCI-naive subjects. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2008, 55(10):2452-2462.
5. Roberts T., Ferrari P., Stufflebeam S., Poeppel D. Latency of the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components: stimulus dependence and insights toward perception. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 2000, 17(2):114-129.
6. Cohen A. Biomedical Signal Processing, Vol. II, Compression and Automatic Recognition 1986, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
7. Geddes L., Baker L. Principles of Applied Biomedical Instrumentation 1989, John Wiley and Sons, New York. 3rd ed.
8. Picton T., Lins O., Scherg M. The recording and analysis of event-related potentials. Vol. 10 of Handbook of Neuropsychology 1995, 3-73. Elsevier, Amsterdam, (Chapter 1). F. Boller, J. Grafman (Eds.).
9. Aunon J., McGillem C., Childers D. Signal processing in event potential research: averaging and modelling. CRC Critical Reviews in Bioengineering 1981, 5:323-367.
10. Lange D., Siegelmann H., Pratt H., Inbar G. Overcoming selective ensemble averaging: unsupervised identification of event-related brain potentials. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2000, 47(6):822-826.
11. Handy H. Event-Related Potentials: A Methods Handbook 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Huizenga H., van Zuijen T., Heslenfeld D., Molenaar P. Simultaneous MEG and EEG source analysis. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2001, 46:1737-1751.
13. MEG. An Introduction to Methods 2010, Oxford University Press, Inc., New York. P. Hansen, M. Kringelbach, R. Salmelin (Eds.).
14. Hämäläinen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R., Knuutila J., Lounasma O. Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Reviews of Modern Physics 1993, 65:413-497.
15. Hyvärinen A., Karhunen J., Oja E. Independent Component Analysis, Wiley Series on Adaptive and Learning Systems for Signal processing, Communications, and Control 2001, Wiley-Interscience, New York.
16. James C., Hesse C. ICA for biomedical signals. Physiological Measurement 2005, 26:15-39.
17. Ziehe A., Müller K. TDSEP-an efficient algorithm for blind separation using time structure. Proceedings of the 8th ICANN 1998, 675-680.
18. Belouchrani A., Abed-Meraim K., Cardoso J., Moulines E. A blind source separation technique based on second-order statistics. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1997, 45:434-444.
19. Jung T.-P., Humphries C., Lee T.-W., McKeown M., Iragui V., Makeig S., Sejnowski T. Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:163-178.
20. Hyvärinen A., Oja E. A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis. Neural Computation 1997, 9:1483-1492.
21. Ziehe A., Nolte G., Sander T., Mueller K., Curio G. A comparison of ICA-based artifact reduction methods for MEG. Proceedings of Biomag 2001, 895-899. J. Nenonen, R. Ilmoniemi, T. Katila (Eds.).
22. Sander T., Burghoff M., Curio G., Trahms L. Single evoked somatosensory MEG responses extracted by time delayed decorrelation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2005, 53(9):3384-3392.
23. Tang A., Sutherland M., Wang Y. Contrasting single-trial ERPs between experimental manipulations: improving differentiability by blind source separation. NeuroImage 2006, 29(1):335-346.
24. Makeig S., Jung T.-P., Bell A., Ghahremani D., Sejnowski T. Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. Proceedings of the National Academy Science of United States of America, Neurobiology 1997, 94(20):10979-10984.
25. Viola F., Thorne J., Bleeck S., Eyles J., Debener S. Uncovering auditory evoked potentials from cochlear implant users with independent component analysis. Psychophysiology 2011, 48(11):1470-1480.
26. Sander T., Wübbeler G., Lueschow A., Curio G., Trahms L. Cardiac artifact subspace identification and elimination in cognitive MEG-data using time-delayed decorrelation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2002, 49:345-354.
27. Mäkinen V., Tiitinen H., May P. Auditory event-related responses are generated independently of ongoing brain activity. NeuroImage 2005, 24:961-968.
28. Klimesch W., Sauseng P., Hanslmayr S., Gruber F.R.W. Event-related phase reorganization may explain evoked neural dynamics. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2007, 31(7):1003-1016.
29. van Dijk H., van der Werf J., Mazaheri A., Medendorp W., Jensen O. Modulations in oscillatory activity with amplitude asymmetry can produce cognitively relevant event related responses. Proceedings of the National Academy Science 2010, 107(2):900-905.
30. Nikulin V., Linkenkaer-Hansen N.G.K., Curio G. Non-zero mean and asymmetry of neuronal oscillations have different implications for evoked responses. Clinical Neurophysiology 2010, 121(2):186-193.
31. Jung T., Makeig S., Mckeown M., Bell A., Lee T.-W., Sejnowski T. Imaging brain dynamics using independent component analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE 2001, 89(7):1107-1122.
32. Lee T.-W., Girolami M., Sejnowski T. ICA using an extended infomax algorithm for mixed sub- and supergaussian sources. Neural Computing 1999, 11:417-441.
33. Zavala-Fernandez H., Sander T., Burghoff M., Orglmeister R., Trahms L. Comparison of ICA algorithms for the isolation of biological artifacts in magnetoencephalography. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Independent Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation, ICA 2006. Springer, vol. 3889 2006, 511-518.
34. Quian-Quiroga R. Evoked potentials. Encyclopedia of Medical Devices and Instrumentation 2006, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, pp. 233-246. 2nd ed.
35. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including ICA. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
36. Makeig S., Westerfield M., Jung T., Enghoff S., Townsend J., Courchesne E., Sejnowski T. Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science 2002, 295(5555):690-694.
37. Makeig S., Debener S., Onton J., Delorme A. Mining event-related brain dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Elsevier 2004, 8(5):204-210.
38. Shahin A., Roberts L., Pantev C., Trainor L., Ross B. Modulation of P2 auditory-evoked responses by the spectral complexity of musical sounds. NeuroReport 2005, 16(16):1781-1785.