The classification of cancer stage microarray data

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1070-1077

  Chen, Chi Kan ^a  

^a Department of Applied Mathematics   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Cancer stage; Classification; Microarray data; Ordinal response

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; CROSS VALIDATION; DATA DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; DISTRIBUTION-FREE; FEATURE RANKING; GENE EXPRESSION MICROARRAY; GENE EXPRESSION PATTERNS; LOGIT MODELS; MICROARRAY DATA; MICROARRAY DATA SETS; MICROARRAY TECHNOLOGIES; ORDINAL REGRESSION; ORDINAL RESPONSE; ORDINAL SCALE; RECURSIVE FEATURE ELIMINATION; UNIVARIATE;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA REDUCTION; GENE EXPRESSION; PATIENT TREATMENT;

DISEASES;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BLADDER CANCER; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; GENE EXPRESSION; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; LUNG CANCER; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM; OVARY CANCER; PROSTATE CANCER; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84868522404     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: 18727565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ananth C.V., Kleinbaum D.G. Regression models for ordinal responses: a review of methods and applications. International Journal of Epidemiology 1997, 26(6):1323-1333.
2. Archer K.J., Williams A.A. L(1) penalized continuation ratio models for ordinal response prediction using high-dimensional datasets. Statistics in Medicine 2012, 31(14):1464-1474.
3. Burges C., et al. Learning to rank using gradient descent. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning 2005, 89-96.
4. Chu W., Keerthi S.S. New approaches to support vector ordinal regression. ICML: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning 2005, 145-152.
5. Dudoit S., Fridlyand J., Speed T.P. Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tumors using gene expression data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2002, 97(457):77-87.
6. Dyrskjot L., et al. Identifying distinct classes of bladder carcinoma using microarrays. Nature Genetics 2003, 33(1):90-96.
7. Golub T.R., et al. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 1999, 286(5439):531-537.
8. Guyon I., et al. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Machine Learning 2002, 46:389-422.
9. Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer Series in Statistics 2011, Springer-Verlag, New York.
10. Herbrich R., Graepel T., Obermayer K. Advances in large margin classifiers. Large Margin Rank Boundaries for Ordinal Regression 2000, MIT Press, (Chapter 7). P.J. Bartlett (Ed.).
11. Khan J., et al. Classification and diagnostic prediction of cancers using gene expression profiling and artificial neural networks. Nature Medicine 2001, 7:673-679.
12. Lauss M., Ringner M., Hoglund M. Prediction of stage, grade, and survival in bladder cancer using genome-wide expression data: a validation study. Clinical Cancer Research 2010, 16(17):4421-4433.
13. Liu T.-Y. Learning to rank for information retrieval. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2009, 3(3):225-331.
14. McCullagh P. Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1980, 42(2):109-142.
15. R Development Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Software available at http://www.r.project.org/.
16. Ramaswamy S., et al. Multiclass cancer diagnosis using tumor gene expression signatures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2001, 98(26):15149-15154.
17. Scholkopf B., Smola A.J., Muller R.M. Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural Computation 1998, 10(5):1299-1319.
18. Shashua A., Levin A. Ranking with large margin principle: two approaches. Neural Information Processing Systems 2002, 937-944.
19. Staiger C., et al. A critical evaluation of network and pathway-based classifiers for outcome prediction in breast cancer. PLoS One 2012, 7(4):e34796.
20. Tomida S., et al. Gene expression-based, individualized outcome prediction for surgically treated lung cancer patients. Oncogene 2004, 23(July (31)):5360-5370.
21. True L., et al. A molecular correlate to the Gleason grading system for prostate adenocarcinoma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103(29):10991-10996.
22. Vapnik V. Statistical Learning Theory 1998, Wiley.
23. Wong Y.F., et al. Expression genomics of cervical cancer: molecular classification and prediction of radiotherapy response by DNA microarray. Clinical Cancer Research 2003, 9(15):5486-5492.
24. Wu H., Lu H., Ma S. A practical SVM-based algorithm for ordinal regression in image retrieval. Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Multimedia 2003, 612-621.
25. Wu R., et al. Mouse model of human ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma based on somatic defects in the Wnt/beta-catenin and PI3K/Pten signaling pathways. Cancer Cell 2007, 11(4):321-333.
26. Zhou X., Tuck D.P. MSVM-RFE: extensions of SVM-RFE for multiclass gene selection on DNA microarray data. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(9):1106-1114.
27. Zhu J., Hastie T. Classification of gene microarrays by penalized logistic regression. Biostatistics 2004, 5(3):427-443.