Prospective comparison of loop excision under colposcopic guidance versus vitom guidance

Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde

Volumn 72, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 945-948

  Vercellino, G F ^a   Chiantera, V ^a   Gassmann J ^b   Erdemoglu, E ^c   Drechsler, I ^a   Frangini, S ^a   Schneider, A ^a   Bohmer G ^d  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^c SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^d Colposcopy Clinic Wagner Stibbe ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

cervical cancer; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN); cervical precancerous condition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; COLPOSCOPE; COLPOSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY;

EID: 84868457432     PISSN: 00165751     EISSN: 14388804     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1327779     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Oyesanya O. A., Amerasinghe C., Manning E. A. A comparison between loop diathermy conization and cold-knife conization for management of cervical dysplasia associated with unsatisfactory colposcopy. Gynecol Oncol: 1993; 50 84 88
2. Alvarez R. D., Helm C. W., Edwards R. P. et al. Prospective randomized trial of LLETZ versus laser ablation in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol: 1994; 52 175 179
3. Duggan B. D., Felix J. C., Muderspach L. I. et al. Cold-knife conization versus conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized, prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 1999; 180 276 282
4. Prendiville W., Cullimore J., Norman S. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol: 1989; 96 1054 1060
5. Bigrigg M. A., Codling B. W., Pearson P. et al. Colposcopic diagnosis and treatment of cervical dysplasia at a single clinic visit. Experience of low-voltage diathermy loop in 1000 patients. Lancet: 1990; 336 229 231
6. Vercellino G. F., Erdemoglu E., Kyeyamwa S. et al. Evaluation of the VITOM in digital high-definition video exocolposcopy. J Low Genit Tract Dis: 2011; 15 292 295
7. Keijser K. G., Kenemans P., van der Zanden P. H. et al. Diathermy loop excision in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: diagnosis and treatment in one procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 1992; 166 1281 1287
8. Chappatte O. A., Byrne D. L., Raju K. S. et al. Histological differences between colposcopic-directed biopsy and loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ): a cause for concern. Gynecol Oncol: 1991; 43 46 50
9. Howe D. T., Vincenti A. C. Is large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) more accurate than colposcopically directed punch biopsy in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia? Br J Obstet Gynaecol: 1991; 98 588 591
10. Paraskevaidis E., Koliopoulos G., Lolis E. et al. Delivery outcomes following loop electrosurgical excision procedure for microinvasive (FIGO stage IA1) cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol: 2002; 86 10 13
11. Brun J. L., Youbi A., Hocké C. [Complications, sequellae and outcome of cervical conizations: evaluation of three surgical techniques]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris): 2002; 31 558 564
12. Kietpeerakool C., Suprasert P., Khunamornpong S. et al. "Top hato" versus conventional loop electrosurgical excision procedure in women with a type 3 transformation zone. Int J Gynaecol Obstet: 2010; 109 59 62
13. Sutthichon P., Kietpeerakool C. Perioperative complications of an outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a review of 857 consecutive cases. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev: 2009; 10 351 354