Rules from cognition for conceptual modelling

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7532 LNCS, Issue , 2012, Pages 78-87

  Stark, Jeannette ^a   Esswein, Werner ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE THEORY; CONCEPTUAL MODELLING;

DATA MINING;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84868335619     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-34002-4_6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Larkin, J., Simon, H.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11(1), 65-100 (1987)
2. Moody, D.: What makes a good diagram? improving the cognitive effectiveness of diagrams in is development. ADBIS 492, 481-492 (2007)
3. Rockwell, S., Bajaj, A.: Cogeval: Applying cognitive theories to evaluate conceptual models. Advanced Topics in Database Research 4, 255-282 (2004)
4. Gemino, A.,Wand, Y.: Complexity and clarity in conceptual modeling: Comparison of mandatory and optional properties. Data & Knowledge Engineering 55(3), 301-326 (2005)
5. Khatri, V., Vessey, I., Ramesh, V., Clay, P., Park, S.: Understanding conceptual schemas: Exploring the role of application and IS domain knowledge. ISR 17(1), 81-99 (2006)
6. Recker, J., Dreiling, A.: Does it matter which process modelling language we teach or use? an experimental study on understanding process modelling languages without formal education. In: ACIS 2007, pp. 356-366 (2007)
7. Gemino, A., Wand, Y.: A framework for empirical evaluation of conceptual modeling techniques. Requirements Engineering 9(4), 248-260 (2004)
8. Parsons, J.: Effects of local versus global schema diagrams on verification and communication in conceptual data modeling. JMIS 19(3), 155-183 (2002)
9. Moody, D.L.: Cognitive Load Effects on End User Understanding of Conceptual Models: An Experimental Analysis. In: Benczúr, A.A., Demetrovics, J., Gottlob, G. (eds.) ADBIS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3255, pp. 129-143. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
10. Vessey, I., Galletta, D.: Cognitive fit: An empirical study of information acquisition. ISR 2(1), 63-84 (1991)
11. Agarwal, R., Sinha, A., Tanniru, M.: Cognitive fit in requirements modeling: A study of object and process methodologies. JMIS 13(2), 137-162 (1996)
12. Gemino, A.: Empirical comparisons of animation and narration in requirements validation. Requirements Engineering 9(3), 153-168 (2004)
13. Kim, J., Hahn, J., Hahn, H.: How do we understand a system with (so) many diagrams? cognitive integration processes in diagrammatic reasoning. ISR 11(3), 284-303 (2000)
14. Bodart, F., Patel, A., Sim, M., Weber, R.: Should the optional property construct be used in conceptual modeling? ISR 12(4), 384-405 (2001)
15. Weber, R.: Are attributes entities? a study of database designers' memory structures. ISR 7(2), 137-162 (1996)
16. Bajaj, A.: The effect of the number of concepts on the readability of schemas: an empirical study with data models. Requirements Engineering 9(4), 261-270 (2004)
17. Moody, D.: Comparative Evaluation of Large Data Model Representation Methods: The Analyst's Perspective. In: Spaccapietra, S., March, S.T., Kambayashi, Y. (eds.) ER 2002. LNCS, vol. 2503, p. 214. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
18. Kahneman, D.: Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1973)
19. Miller, G.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2), 81 (1956)
20. Craik, F., Lockhart, R.: Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. J. of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11(6), 671-684 (1972)
21. Kintsch, W., Vipond, D.: Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1979)
22. Moody, D.: The physics of notations: Toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 35(6), 756-779 (2009)
23. Shannon, C., Weaver, W.: The mathematical theory of communication, vol. 19. University of Illinois Press Urban (1962)
24. Bertin, J.: Semiology of graphics: Diagrams, networks, maps. Wisconsin Press (1983)
25. Newell, A., Simon, H.: Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall (1972)
26. Goodman, N.: Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Bobbs-Merrill Co. (1968)
27. Parsons, J., Wand, Y.: Using cognitive principles to guide classification in information systems modeling. MISQ 32(4), 839-868 (2008)
28. Hegarty, M., Just, M.: Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. J. of Memory and Language 32, 717-742 (1993)
29. Mayer, R.: Models for understanding. Rev. of Educat. Research 59(1), 43-64 (1989)
30. Lohse, G.: A cognitive model for understanding graphical perception. Human-Computer Interaction 8(4), 353-388 (1993)
31. Palmer, S., Rock, I.: Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1(1), 29-55 (1994)