AUSTRALIA;
BRUNEI DARUSSALAM;
CHILE;
GOVERNMENT;
INVESTMENT;
MALAYSIA;
NEW ZEALAND;
PERU;
PUBLIC HEALTH;
PUBLIC POLICY;
SINGAPORE;
TOBACCO;
UNITED STATES;
VIET NAM;
ARTICLE;
COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA;
DRUG CONTROL;
DRUG COST;
DRUG PACKAGING;
ECONOMICS;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HEALTH CARE POLICY;
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;
LEGAL ASPECT;
PATENT;
REIMBURSEMENT;
AUSTRALIA;
COMMERCE;
DRUG AND NARCOTIC CONTROL;
DRUG COSTS;
DRUG PACKAGING;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HEALTH POLICY;
INSURANCE, HEALTH, REIMBURSEMENT;
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY;
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;
INVESTMENTS;
Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Gillard Government Trade Policy Statement: trading our way to more jobs and prosperity. Canberra: DFAT, 2011. http://www.dfat.gov.au/publications/trade/trading-our-way-to-more-jobs-and-prosperity.pdf (accessed Dec 2011).
Koivusalo M, Schrecker T, Labonte R. Globalization and policy space for health and social determinants of health. In: Labonte R, Schrecker T, Packer C, Runnels V, editors. Globalization and health: pathways, evidence and policy. New York: Routledge, 2009: 105-130.
Philip Morris v Uruguay: Will investor-state arbitration send restrictions on tobacco marketing up in smoke?
(accessed Dec 2011)
Porterfield MC, Byrnes CR. Philip Morris v Uruguay: will investor-state arbitration send restrictions on tobacco marketing up in smoke? Investment Treaty News 2011; 1 (4): 3-5. http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2011/iisd_itn_july_2011_en.pdf (accessed Dec 2011).
Time to quit? Assessing international investment claims against plain tobacco packaging in Australia
Voon T, Mitchell A. Time to quit? Assessing international investment claims against plain tobacco packaging in Australia. J Int Econ Law 2011; 14: 515-552.
Australian Government Attorney-General’s Department. Investor-state arbitration - tobacco plain packaging. http://www.ag.gov.au/Internationallaw/Pages/Investor-State-Arbitration---Tobacco-Plain-Packaging.aspx (accessed Feb 2012).
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Latest developments in investor-state dispute settlement. IIA Issues Note No. 1, March 2011. http://www.unctad.org/en/docs//webdiaeia20113_en.pdf (accessed Dec 2011).
International Institute for Sustainable Development. A parliamentarian’s guide to international investment agreements and their implications for domestic policy-making. Winnipeg: IISD, 2007.
Trans-Pacific Partnership. Transparency chapter: annex on transparency and procedural fairness for healthcare technologies, June 22, 2011. http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/TransPacificTransparency.pdf (accessed Dec 2011).
Draft version 1.2, November 16, Washington: American University Washington College of Law, 2011, (accessed Dec 2011)
Flynn S, Kaminski M, Baker B, Koo J. Public interest analysis of the US TPP proposal for an IP chapter. Draft version 1.2, November 16, 2011. Washington: American University Washington College of Law, 2011. http://infojustice.org/tpp-analysis-november2011 (accessed Dec 2011).
Trans-Pacific Partnership. Intellectual property rights chapter: draft - February 10, 2011. http://keionline.org/sites/default/files/tpp-10feb2011-ustext-ipr-chapter.pdf (accessed Dec 2011).
Trans-Pacific Partnership. Intellectual property rights chapter (selected Provisions), September 2011. http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/TransPacificIP1.pdf (accessed Dec 2011).
Public Citizen. Dangers for access to medicines in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: comparative analysis of the US intellectual property proposal and Australian law. http://www.citizen.org/documents/Australia-TPPA-chart.pdf (accessed Dec 2011).
