Dorso-ventral axis formation of the Drosophila oocyte requires Cyclin G

Hereditas

Volumn 149, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 186-196

  Nagel, Anja C ^a   Szawinski, Jutta ^a   Fischer, Patrick ^a   Maier, Dieter ^a   Wech, Irmgard ^a   Preiss, Anette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLIN G; EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR; G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR KINASE;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DORSO VENTRAL AXIS FORMATION; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; GENE LOSS; GENETIC EPISTASIS; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; OOCYTE DEVELOPMENT; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN SECRETION; RNA TRANSLATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; CHROMOSOMES, INSECT; CYCLIN G; DEAD-BOX RNA HELICASES; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; FEMALE; GENETIC LOCI; MUTATION; OOCYTES; OOGENESIS; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; RECEPTOR, EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR; RECEPTORS, INVERTEBRATE PEPTIDE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR ALPHA;

EID: 84868302119     PISSN: 00180661     EISSN: 16015223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2012.02273.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abdu U., Brodsky M. and Schüpbach T. 2002. Activation of a meiotic checkpoint during Drosophila oogenesis regulates the translation of Gurken through Chk2/Mnk. Curr. Biol. 12: 1645-1651.
2. Bastock R. and St Johnston D. 2008. Drosophila oogenesis. Curr. Biol. 18: R1082-R1087.
3. Bennin D. A., Arachchige Don A. S., Brake T. et al. 2002. Cyclin G2 associates with protein phosphatase 2A catalytic and regulatory B' subunits in active complexes and induces nuclear aberrations and a G1/S phase cell cycle arrest. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 27449-27467.
4. Brand A. H. and Perrimon N. 1993. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118: 401-415.
5. Deng W. M. and Bownes M. 1997. Two signalling pathways specify localised expression of the Broad-Complex in Drosophila eggshell patterning and morphogenesis. Development 124: 4639-4647.
6. Faradji F., Bloyer S., Dardalhon-Cuménal D. et al. 2011. Drosophila melanogaster Cyclin G coordinates cell growth and proliferation. Cell Cycle 10: 805-818.
7. Ghabrial A. and Schüpbach T. 1999. Activation of a meiotic checkpoint regulates translation of Gurken during Drosophila oogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 1: 354-357.
8. Ghiglione C., Carraway K. L., 3rd, Amundadottir L. T. et al. 1999. The transmembrane molecule kekkon 1 acts in a feedback loop to negatively regulate the activity of the Drosophila EGF receptor during oogenesis. Cell 96: 847-856.
9. Ghiglione C., Bach E. A., Paraiso Y. et al. 2002. Mechanism of activation of the Drosophila EGF receptor by the TGFalpha ligand Gurken during oogenesis. Development 129: 175-186.
10. González-Reyes A., Elliott H. and St Johnston D. 1995. Polarization of both major body axes in Drosophila by gurken-torpedo signalling. Nature 375: 654-658.
11. Guruharsha K. G., Rual J. F., Zhai B. et al. 2011. A protein complex network of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 147: 690-703.
12. Herpers B. and Rabouille C. 2004. mRNA localization and ER-based protein sorting mechanisms dictate the use of transitional endoplasmic reticulum-golgi units involved in gurken transport in Drosophila oocytes. Mol. Biol. Cell 15: 5306-5317.
13. Horne M. C., Goolsby G. L., Donaldson K. L. et al. 1996. Cyclin G1 and cyclin G2 comprise a new family of cyclins with contrasting tissue-specific and cell cycle-regulated expression. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 6050-6061.
14. Johnstone O. and Lasko P. 2001. Translational regulation and RNA localization in Drosophila oocytes and embryos. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35: 365-406.
15. Kimura S. H., Ikawa M., Ito A. et al. 2001. Cyclin G1 is involved in G2/M arrest in response to DNA damage and in growth control after damage recovery. Oncogene 20: 3290-3300.
16. King R. C. 1970. Ovarian development in Drosophila melanogaster. - Academic Press.
17. Klattenhoff C., Bratu D. P., McGinnes-Schultz N. et al. 2007. Drosophila rasiRNA pathway mutations disrupt embryonic axis specification through activation of an ATR/Chk2 DNA damage response. Dev. Cell 12: 45-55.
18. Klattenhoff C., Xi H., Li C. et al. 2009. The Drosophila HP1 homolog Rhino is required for transposon silencing and piRNA production by dual-strand clusters. Cell 138: 1137-1149.
19. Kugler J. M. and Lasko P. 2009. Localization, anchoring and translational control of oskar, gurken, bicoid and nanos during Drosophila oogenesis. Fly 3: 15-28.
20. Kugler J. M., Woo J. S., Oh B. H. et al. 2010. Regulation of Drosophila vasa in vivo through paralogous cullin-RING E3 ligase specificity receptors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30: 1769-1782.
21. Lehner C. F. and Lane M. E. 1997. Cell cycle regulators in Drosophila: downstream and part of developmental deci sions. J. Cell Sci. 110: 523-528.
22. Liang L., Diehl-Jones W. and Lasko P. 1994. Localization of vasa protein to the Drosophila pole plasm is independent of its RNA-binding and helicase activities. Development 120: 1201-1211.
23. Maier D., Stumm G., Kuhn K. et al. 1992. Hairless, a Drosophila gene involved in neural development, encodes a novel, serine rich protein. Mech. Dev. 38: 143-156.
24. Maier D., Marte B. M., Schäfer W. et al. 1993. Drosophila evolution challenges postulated redundancy in the E(spl) gene complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90: 5464-5468.
25. Murali T., Pacifico S., Yu J. et al. 2011. DroID 2011: a comprehensive, integrated resource for protein, transcription factor, RNA and gene interactions for Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res. 39: D736-743.
26. Musacchio M. and Perrimon N. 1996. The Drosophila kekkon genes: novel members of both the leucine-rich repeat and immunoglobulin superfamilies expressed in the CNS. Dev. Biol. 178: 63-76.
27. Nagel A. C., Fischer P., Szawinski J. et al.. Cycling G is involved in meiotic recombination repair in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Cell Sci., in press.
28. Neuman-Silberberg F. S. and Schüpbach T. 1993. The Drosophila dorsoventral patterning gene gurken produces a dorsally localized RNA and encodes a TGF alpha-like protein. Cell 75: 165-174.
29. Neuman-Silberberg F. S. and Schüpbach T. 1996. The Drosophila TGF-α-like protein Gurken: expression and cellular localization during Drosophila oogenesis. Mech. Dev. 59: 105-113.
30. Nilson L. A. and Schüpbach T. 1999. EGF receptor sig nalling in Drosophila oogenesis. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 44: 203-243.
31. Peri F., Bökel C. and Roth S. 1999. Local Gurken signalling and dynamic MAPK activation during Drosophila oogenesis. Mech. Dev. 81: 75-88.
32. Pizette S., Rabouille C., Cohen S. M. et al. 2009. Glycosphingolipids control the extracellular gradient of the Drosophila EGFR ligand Gurken. Development 136: 551-561.
33. Preiss A., Hartley D. A. and Artavanis-Tsakonas S. 1988. The molecular genetics of Enhancer of split, a gene required for embryonic neural development in Drosophila. EMBO J. 7: 3917-3927.
34. Queenan A. M., Ghabrial A. and Schüpbach T. 1997. Ectopic activation of torpedo/Egfr, a Drosophila receptor tyrosine kinase, dorsalizes both the eggshell and the embryo. Development 124: 3871-3880.
35. Queenan A. M., Barcelo G., Van Buskirk C. et al. 1999. The transmembrane region of Gurken is not required for biological activity, but is necessary for transport to the oocyte membrane in Drosophila. Mech. Dev. 89: 35-42.
36. Ray R. P. and Schüpbach T. 1996. Intercellular signalling and the polarization of body axes during Drosophila oogenesis. Genes Dev. 10: 1711-1723.
37. Roth S., Neuman-Silberberg F. S., Barcelo G. et al. 1995. Cornichon and the EGF receptor signalling process are necessary for both anterior-posterior and dorsal-ventral pattern formation in Drosophila. Cell 81: 967-978.
38. Ruohola-Baker H., Grell E., Chou T. B. et al. 1993. Spatially localized rhomboid is required for establishment of the dorsal-ventral axis in Drosophila oogenesis. Cell 73: 953-965.
39. Salvaing J., Nagel A. C., Mouchel-Vielh E. et al. 2008a. The enhancer of Tritorax and Polycomb Corto interacts with Cyclin G in Drosophila. PLOS One 20: e1658.
40. Salvaing J., Mouchel-Vielh E., Bloyer S. et al. 2008b. Regulation of Abd-B expression by Cyclin G and Corto in the abdominal epithelium of Drosophila. Hereditas 145: 138-146.
41. Sapir A., Schweitzer R. and Shilo B. Z. 1998. Sequential activation of the EGF receptor pathway during Drosophila oogenesis establishes the dorsoventral axis. Development 125: 191-200.
42. Spradling A. C. 1993. Developmental genetics of oogenesis. - In: Bate M. and Martinez-Arias A. (eds), The Develop ment of Drosophila melanogaster. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp. 1-70.
43. Staeva-Vieira E., Yoo S. and Lehmann R. 2003. An essential role of DmRad51/SpnA in DNA repair and meiotic check point control. EMBO J. 22: 5863-5874.
44. Stanyon C. A., Liu G., Mangiola B. A. et al. 2004. A Drosophila protein-interaction map centered on cell-cycle regulators. Genome Biol. 5(12): R96.
45. Styhler S., Nakamura A., Suter B. et al. 2002. Vasa localiza tion requires the SPRY-domain and SOCS-Box containing protein, GUSTAVUS. Dev. Cell 3: 865-867.
46. Tautz D. and Pfeifle C. 1989. A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma 98: 81-85.
47. Vagin V. V., Klenov M. S., Kalmykova A. I. et al. 2004. The RNA interference proteins and Vasa locus are involved in the silencing of retrotransposons in the female germline of Drosophila melanogaster.- RNA Biol. 1: 54-58.
48. Van der Meer J. 1977. Optical clean and permanent whole ount preparations for phase-contrast microscopy of cuti cular structures of insect larvae. Drosophila Inf. Serv. 52: 160.
49. Wasserman J. D. and Freeman M. 1998. An autoregulatory cascade of EGF receptor signaling patterns the Drosophila egg. Cell 95: 355-364.
50. Wisotzkey R. G., Mehra A., Sutherland D. J. et al. 1998. Medea is a Drosophila Smad4 homolog that is differentially required to potentiate DPP responses. Development 125: 1433-1445.
51. Yakoby N., Lembong J., Schüpbach T. et al. 2008. Drosophila eggshell is patterned by sequential action of feedforward and feedback loops. Development 135: 343-351.