Local and non-local preferences for nature tourism facility development

Tourism Management Perspectives

Volumn 4, Issue , 2012, Pages 215-222

  Lindberg, Kreg ^a   Veisten, Knut ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORT ECONOMICS   (Norway)

Author keywords

Choice experiment; Mixed logit; Nature tourism; Preference heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868299680     PISSN: 22119736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmp.2012.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aas Ø., Haider W., Hunt L. Angler responses to potential harvest regulations in a Norwegian sport fishery: A conjoint-based choice modeling approach. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 2000, 20:940-950.
2. Adamowicz W.L., Boxall P., Williams M., Louviere J. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1998, 80:64-75.
3. Albaladejo-Pina I.P., Díaz-Delfa M.T. Tourist preferences for rural house stays: Evidence from discrete choice modeling in Spain. Tourism Management 2009, 30:805-811.
4. Anonymous Where the Arctic cats roam. Economist Feb. 9, 2008, 386(8566):34.
5. Anonymous U.S. curtails snowmobiles in Yellowstone Oct. 16, 2009, 17. New York Times.
6. Barros C.P., Butler R., Correia A. Heterogeneity in destination choice. Journal of Travel Research 2008, 47(2):235-246.
7. Bech M., Gyrd-Hansen D. Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. Health Economics 2005, 14:1079-1083.
8. Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S. Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand 1985, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Berenguer J., Corraliza J.A., Martín R. Rural-urban differences in environmental concern, attitudes, and actions. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 2005, 21(2):128-138.
10. Bonaiuto M., Carus G., Martorella, Bonnes M. Local identity processes and environmental attitudes in land use changes: The case of natural protected areas. Journal of Economic Psychology 2002, 23:631-653.
11. Brau R. Demand-driven sustainable tourism? A choice modeling analysis. Tourism Economics 2008, 14(4):691-708.
12. Carson R.T., Groves T. Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environmental and Resource Economics 2007, 37(1):181-210.
13. Choi A.S., Ritchie B.W., Papandrea F., Bennett J. Economic valuation of cultural heritage sites: A choice modeling approach. Tourism Management 2010, 31:213-220.
14. Daugstad K., Svarstad H., Vistad O.I. Case of conflicts in conservation: Two trenches or a three-dimensional complexity?. Landscape Research 2006, 31(1):1-19.
15. Denstadli J.M., Lindberg K., Vistad O.I. Stakeholder consensus regarding trail conditions and management responses: A Norwegian case study. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 2010, 10(3):358-374.
16. Durrant J.O., Shumway J.M. Attitudes toward wilderness study areas: A survey of six southeastern Utah counties. Environmental Management 2004, 33(2):271-283.
17. Førde A. From fishing industry to fish 'porn': Tourism transforming place. Sustainable tourism in rural Europe: Approaches to development 2011, 228-242. Routledge, London. D.V.L. Macleod, S.A. Gillespie (Eds.).
18. Formannskapet i Lom Statusrapport februar 2008: Gondolbane til Lomseggen (Status Report February 2008: Gondola to the Lomseggen mountain) 2008, Executive Committee of Local Council, Municipality of Lom, Lom, Norway.
19. Foster R.H., McBeth M.K. Urban-rural influences in U.S. environmental and economic development policy. Journal of Rural Studies 1996, 12(4):387-397.
20. Hanley N., Barbier E.B. Pricing nature: Cost-benefit analysis and environmental policy-making 2009, Edward Elgar, London.
21. Haukeland J.V. Tourism stakeholders' perceptions of national park management in Norway. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2011, 19(2):133-153.
22. Haukeland J.V., Daugstad K., Vistad O.I. Harmony or conflict? A focus group study on traditional use and tourism development in and around Rondane and Jotunheimen national parks in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 2011, 11(Suppl. 1):13-37.
23. Hensher D.A., Rose J.M., Greene W.H. Applied choice analysis: A primer 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
24. Holmes T.P., Adamowicz W.L. Attribute-based methods. A primer on nonmarket valuation 2003, 171-220. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. P.A. Champ, K.J. Boyle, T.C. Brown (Eds.).
25. Huddart-Kennedy E., Beckley T.M., McFarlane B.L., Nadeau S. Rural-urban differences in environmental concern in Canada. Rural Sociology 2009, 74(3):309-329.
26. Huybers T., Bennett J. Impact of the environment on holiday destination choices of prospective UK tourists: Implications for Tropical North Queensland. Tourism Economics 2000, 6(1):21-46.
27. Juutinen A., Mitani Y., Mäntymaa E., Shoji Y., Siikamäki P., Svento R. Combining ecological and recreational aspects in national park management: A choice experiment application. Ecological Economics 2011, 70:1231-1239.
28. Kaltenborn B.P., Andersen O., Nellemann C., Bjerke T., Thrane C. Resident attitudes towards mountain second-home tourism development in Norway: The effects of environmental attitudes. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2008, 16(6):664-680.
29. Kelly J., Haider W., Williams P.W., Englund K. Stated preferences of tourists for eco-efficient destination planning options. Tourism Management 2007, 28:377-390.
30. Lawson S.R., Manning R.E. Tradeoffs among social, resource, and management attributes of the Denali wilderness experience: A contextual approach to normative research. Leisure Sciences 2002, 24(3):297-312.
31. Lindberg K., Andersson T.D., Dellaert B.G.C. Tourism development: Assessing social gains and losses. Annals of Tourism Research 2001, 28(4):1010-1030.
32. Lindberg K., Fredman P., Heldt T. Facilitating integrated recreation management: Assessing conflict reduction benefits in a common metric. Forest Science 2009, 55(3):201-209.
33. Lundmark L.J.T. Economic restructuring into tourism in the Swedish mountain range. Scandinavian Journal of Tourism and Hospitality 2005, 5(1):23-45.
34. Manski C.F. The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision 1977, 8:229-254.
35. NGI Lomseggje, Lom: Planlagt gondolbane (Planned gondola). Report 20091040-1, February 17, 2009 2009, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI), Oslo, Norway.
36. Slattery D. Resistance to development at Wilsons Promontory National Park (Victoria, Australia). Society and Natural Resources 2002, 15:563-580.
37. Statistics Norway Befolkningsstatistikk (population statistics) 2011, [Retrieved from http://www.ssb.no/emner/02/02/folkendrhist/tabeller/tab/0514.html].
38. Törn A., Siikamäki P., Tolvanen A., Kauppila P., Rämet J. Local people, nature conservation, and tourism in northern Finland. Ecology and Society 2008, 13(1). (online).
39. Van Riper C.J., Manning R.E., Monz C.A., Goonan K.A. Tradeoffs among resource, social, and managerial conditions on mountain summits of the Northern Forest. Leisure Sciences 2011, 33:228-249.
40. Vorkinn M., Riese H. Environmental concern in a local context: The significance of place attachment. Environment and Behavior 2001, 33:249-263.
41. Wall G., Mathieson A. Tourism: Change, impacts and opportunities 2007, Prentice Hall, Harlow, UK.
42. Wray K., Espiner S., Perkins H.C. Cultural clash: Interpreting established use and new tourism activities in protected natural areas. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 2010, 10(3):272-290.