Manifold warping: Manifold alignment over time

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 2, Issue , 2012, Pages 1155-1161

  Vu, Hoa T ^a   Carey, C J ^a   Mahadevan, Sridhar ^a  

^a University of Massachusetts Amherst   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALIGNMENT METHODS; ALTERNATING PROJECTIONS; COMMON STRUCTURES; CURSE OF DIMENSIONALITY; DATA SETS; DYNAMIC TIME WARPING ALGORITHMS; HIGH-DIMENSIONAL; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; LOW-DIMENSIONAL MANIFOLDS; MANIFOLD LEARNING; REAL WORLD DATA; TARGET DOMAIN; THEORETICAL FORMULATION; TIME WARPING; TRANSFER LEARNING;

ALGORITHMS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84868281535     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Anderson, T. 2003. An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley-Interscience.
2. Belkin, M., and Niyogi, P. 2001. Laplacian eigenmaps and spectral techniques for embedding and clustering. Advances in neural information processing systems 14:585-591.
3. De la Torre, F.; Hodgins, J.; Bargteil, A.; Martin, X.; Macey, J.; Collado, A.; and Beltran, P. 2008. Guide to the carnegie mellon university multimodal activity (cmu-mmac) database.
4. Ham, J.; Lee, D.; and Saul, L. 2005. Semisupervised alignment of manifolds. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Z. Ghahramani and R. Cowell, Eds, volume 10, 120-127.
5. Hsu, E.; Pulli, K.; and Popovic, J. 2005. Style translation for human motion. In ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), volume 24, 1082-1089. ACM.
6. Jolliffe, I. 2002. Principal component analysis. Springer series in statistics. Springer-Verlag.
7. Junejo, I.; Dexter, E.; Laptev, I.; Pérez, P.; et al. 2008. Cross-view action recognition from temporal self-similarities.
8. Keogh, E., and Pazzani, M. 2001. Derivative dynamic time warping. In First SIAM international conference on data mining, 5-7.
9. Roweis, S., and Saul, L. 2000. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science 290(2323-232).
10. S. A. Nene, S. K. Nayar, H. M. 1996. Columbia object image library (coil-100). Technical Report CUCS-006-96.
11. Sakoe, H., and Chiba, S. 1978. Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on 26(1):43-49.
12. Tenenbaum, J.; De Silva, V.; and Langford, J. 2000. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science 290(5500):2319-2323.
13. Wang, C., and Mahadevan, S. 2008. Manifold alignment using procrustes analysis. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning, 1120-1127. ACM.
14. Wang, C., and Mahadevan, S. 2009. A general framework for manifold alignment. In AAAI Fall Symposium on Manifold Learning and its Applications.
15. Zhou, F., and De la Torre, F. 2009. Canonical time warping for alignment of human behavior. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) 1-9.
16. Zhou, F.; Torre, F.; and Hodgins, J. 2008. Aligned cluster analysis for temporal segmentation of human motion. In Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition, 2008. FG'08. 8th IEEE International Conference on, 1-7. IEEE.