Using relational and behavioural semantics in the verification of object models

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Volumn 49 AICT, Issue , 2000, Pages 163-182

  Bolton, Christie ^a   Davies, Jim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

analysis; consistency; refinement; specification; UML; verification

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS; CONSISTENCY; OBJECT MODEL; REFINEMENT; UML;

SPECIFICATIONS; VERIFICATION;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84868279035     PISSN: 18684238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35520-7_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. D. Amyot and L. Logrippo. Use case maps and lotos for the prototyping and validation of a mobile group call system. Computer Communications, 23(8), 2000.
2. D. Amyot, L. Logrippo, R.J.A. Buhr, and T. Gray. Use case maps for the capture and validation of distributed systems requirements. In Proceedings of RE '99, 1999.
3. C. Bolton. ioData types and processes. Technical Report PRG-TR-01-00, University of Oxford, 2000.
4. C. Bolton, J. Davies, and J. Woodcock. On the refinement and simulation of data types and processes. In K. Araki, A. Galloway, and K. Taguchi, editors, Proceedings of IFM'99. Springer, 1999.
5. H. Bowman and J. Derrick. A junction between state-based and behavioural specification. In P. Ciancarini, A. Fantechi, and R. Gorrieri, editors, Proceedings of FMOODS '99. Kluwer, 1999.
6. R. J. A. Buhr and R. S. Casselman. Use case maps for object-oriented systems. Prentice-Hall International, 1996.
7. S. J. Creese and A. W. Roscoe. Verifying an independent family of inductions simultaneously using data independence and fdr. In Proceedings of FORTE/PSTV '99. Kluwer Academic Press, 1999.
8. R. Duke and G. Rose. Formal Object-Oriented Specification Using Object-Z. Macmillan, 2000. To appear.
9. C. Fischer. CSP-OZ: A combination of Object-Z and CSP. In H. Bowman and J. Derrick, editors, Proceedings of FMOODS '97, volume 2. Chapman and Hall, 1997.
10. C. Fischer. How to combine Z with a process algebra. In J. Bowen, A. Fett, and M. Hinchey, editors, Proceedings of ZUM '98, volume 1493 of LNCS. Springer-Verlag, 1998.
11. R. B. France, J.-M. Bruel, M. M. Larrondo-Petrie, and M. Shroff. Exploring the semantics of UML type structures with Z. In H. Bowman and J. Derrick, editors, Proceedings of FMOODS '97, volume 2. Chapman and Hall, 1997.
12. C. A. R. Hoare. Communicating Sequential Processes. Prentice Hall, 1985.
13. C. A. R. Hoare, J. He, and J. W. Sanders. Prespecification in data refinement. Information Processing Letters, 1987.
14. ISO. LOTOS - A formal description technique based on the temporal ordering of observational behaviour. IS 8807, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1989.
15. D. Latella, I. Majzik, and M. Massink. Towards a formal operational semantics of UML statechart diagrams. In A. Fantechi P. Ciancarini and R. Gorrieri, editors, Proceedings of FMOODS '99. Kluwer, 1999.
16. R. Lazic. A semantic study of data independence with applications to model checking. PhD thesis, University of Oxford, 1999.
17. precise UML group. http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/puml/, 2000.
18. A. W. Roscoe. The Theory and Practice of Concurrency. Prentice Hall Series in Computer Science, 1998.
19. J. Rumbaugh, I. Jacobson, and G. Booch. The Unified Modeling Language reference manual. Addison-Wesley, 1997.
20. G. Smith and J. Derrick. Refinement and verification of concurrent systems specified in Object-Z and CSP. In Proceedings of ICFEM'97. IEEE Computer Press, 1997.
21. J. M. Spivey. The Z notation: a reference manual. Prentice-Hall International, 1992.
22. J. C. P. Woodcock and J. Davies. Using Z: Specification, Proof and Refinement. Prentice Hall International Series in Computer Science, 1996.