-
1
-
-
0031855391
-
Health care contingent valuation studies: A review and classification of the literature
-
DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199806)7:4<313::AID-HEC350>3.0.CO;2-B
-
Diener A, O'Brien B, Gafni A. Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature. Health Econ 1998 Jun; 7 (4): 313-26 (Pubitemid 28339960)
-
(1998)
Health Economics
, vol.7
, Issue.4
, pp. 313-326
-
-
Diener, A.1
O'Brien, B.2
Gafni, A.3
-
2
-
-
2942685293
-
The insensitivity of 'willingness-to-pay' to the size of the good: New evidence for health care
-
DOI 10.1016/S0167-4870(03)00029-1, PII S0167487003000291
-
Olsen JA, Donaldson C, Pereira J. The insensitivity of 'willingness-to-pay' to the size of the good: new evidence for health care. J Econ Psychol 2004; 25: 445-60 (Pubitemid 38782229)
-
(2004)
Journal of Economic Psychology
, vol.25
, Issue.4
, pp. 445-460
-
-
Olsen, J.A.1
Donaldson, C.2
Pereira, J.3
-
3
-
-
7544247256
-
Scope insensitivity in contingent valuation of complex environmental amenities
-
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.07.008, PII S0301479704001641
-
Veisten K, Fredrik Hoen H, Navrud S, et al. Scope in-sensitivity in contingent valuation of complex environmental amenities. J Environ Manage 2004 Dec; 73 (4): 317-31 (Pubitemid 39451838)
-
(2004)
Journal of Environmental Management
, vol.73
, Issue.4
, pp. 317-331
-
-
Veisten, K.1
Fredrik Hoen, H.2
Navrud, S.3
Strand, J.4
-
4
-
-
0000976854
-
Scope (in)sensitivity in elicited valuations
-
Frederick S, Fischhoff B. Scope (in)sensitivity in elicited valuations. Risk Decis Policy 1998; 3 (2): 109-23
-
(1998)
Risk Decis Policy
, vol.3
, Issue.2
, pp. 109-123
-
-
Frederick, S.1
Fischhoff, B.2
-
5
-
-
0002530342
-
Contingent valuation surveys and tests of in-sensitivity to scope
-
Kopp RJ, Pommerhene W, Schwartz N, editors Boston: Kluwer
-
Carson RT. Contingent valuation surveys and tests of in-sensitivity to scope. In: Kopp RJ, Pommerhene W, Schwartz N, editors. Determining the value of non-marketed goods: economic, psychological, and policy relevant aspects of contingent valuation methods. Boston: Kluwer, 1997
-
(1997)
Determining the Value of Non-marketed Goods: Economic, Psychological, and Policy Relevant Aspects of Contingent Valuation Methods
-
-
Carson, R.T.1
-
6
-
-
84855522993
-
Scope insensitivity in contingent valuation studies of health care services: Should we ask twice?
-
Feb
-
Gyrd-Hansen D, Kjaer T, Nielsen JS. Scope insensitivity in contingent valuation studies of health care services: should we ask twice? Health Econ 2012 Feb; 21 (2): 101-12
-
(2012)
Health Econ
, vol.21
, Issue.2
, pp. 101-112
-
-
Gyrd-Hansen, D.1
Kjaer, T.2
Nielsen, J.S.3
-
7
-
-
84868272131
-
Insensitivity to scope in contingent valuation studies: Reason for dismissal of valuations?
-
Søgaard R, Lindholt J, Gyrd-Hansen D. Insensitivity to scope in contingent valuation studies: reason for dismissal of valuations? Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2012;10 (6): 397-405
-
(2012)
Appl Health Econ Health Policy
, vol.10
, Issue.6
, pp. 397-405
-
-
Søgaard, R.1
Lindholt, J.2
Gyrd-Hansen, D.3
-
8
-
-
84868297492
-
What explains will-ingness-to-pay for smoking cessation treatments-addiction level, quit rate effectiveness or the opening bid?
-
Olsen JA, Røgeberg OJ, Stavem K. What explains will-ingness-to-pay for smoking cessation treatments-addiction level, quit rate effectiveness or the opening bid? Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2012; 10 (6): 407-15
-
(2012)
Appl Health Econ Health Policy
, vol.10
, Issue.6
, pp. 407-415
-
-
Olsen, J.A.1
Røgeberg, O.J.2
Stavem, K.3
-
9
-
-
84858996695
-
Effect of reporting bias on metaanalyses of drug trials: Reanalysis of meta-analyses
-
Hart B, Lundh A, Bero L. Effect of reporting bias on metaanalyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses. BMJ 2012; 344: d7202
-
(2012)
BMJ
, vol.344
-
-
Hart, B.1
Lundh, A.2
Bero, L.3
-
10
-
-
0033048086
-
The contingent valuation method in health care
-
DOI 10.1016/S0168-8510(99)00010-X, PII S016885109900010X
-
Klose T. The contingent valuation method in health care. Health Policy 1999 May; 47 (2): 97-123 (Pubitemid 29241789)
-
(1999)
Health Policy
, vol.47
, Issue.2
, pp. 97-123
-
-
Klose, T.1
-
11
-
-
34047093751
-
Scope insensitivity in health risk reduction studies: A comparison of choice experiments and the contingent valuation method for valuing safer food
-
Goldberg I, Roosen J. Scope insensitivity in health risk reduction studies: a comparison of choice experiments and the contingent valuation method for valuing safer food. J Risk Uncertainty 2007; 34: 123-44
-
(2007)
J Risk Uncertainty
, vol.34
, pp. 123-144
-
-
Goldberg, I.1
Roosen, J.2
-
12
-
-
0037311310
-
Elicitation format and sensitivity to scope
-
Foster V, Mourato S. Elicitation format and sensitivity to scope. Environ Resource Econ 2003; 24: 141-60
-
(2003)
Environ Resource Econ
, vol.24
, pp. 141-160
-
-
Foster, V.1
Mourato, S.2
-
13
-
-
67149134768
-
Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments
-
Apr
-
Ryan M, Watson V. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. Health Econ 2009 Apr; 18 (4): 389-401
-
(2009)
Health Econ
, vol.18
, Issue.4
, pp. 389-401
-
-
Ryan, M.1
Watson, V.2
-
14
-
-
1142275305
-
The value of hope
-
Bovens L. The value of hope. Philos Phenomenol Res 1999; 59 (3): 667-81
-
(1999)
Philos Phenomenol Res
, vol.59
, Issue.3
, pp. 667-681
-
-
Bovens, L.1
-
15
-
-
65349124774
-
Rationalising the 'irrational': A think aloud study of discrete choice experiment responses
-
Jul 23
-
Ryan M, Watson V, Entwistle V. Rationalising the 'irrational': a think aloud study of discrete choice experiment responses. Health Econ 2009 Jul 23; 18: 321-36
-
(2009)
Health Econ
, vol.18
, pp. 321-336
-
-
Ryan, M.1
Watson, V.2
Entwistle, V.3
|