Methane production from cattle manure supplemented with crude glycerin from the biodiesel industry in CSTR and IBR

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 127, Issue , 2013, Pages 312-317

  Castrillon L ^a   Fernandez Nava Y ^a   Ormaechea, P ^a   Maranon E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Biogas; Cattle manure; Glycerin; Renewable energy; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BIODEGRADATION; BIODIESEL; BIOGAS; LOADING; MANURES; METHANE; METHANOL; ULTRASONICS;

ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; BIODIESEL INDUSTRY; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; CATTLE MANURES; COD REMOVAL; CRUDE GLYCERINS; METHANE PRODUCTION; ORGANIC LOADING RATES; RENEWABLE ENERGIES;

GLYCEROL;

BIODIESEL; BIOGAS; GLYCEROL; METHANE;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOFUEL; CATTLE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CRUDE OIL; GAS PRODUCTION; MANURE; METHANE; METHANOL; OPTIMIZATION; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

ANAEROBIC METABOLISM; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADABILITY; BIOREACTOR; CATTLE; CHEMICAL PROCEDURES; CONTINUOUS STIRRED TANK REACTOR; EFFLUENT; MANURE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; ULTRASOUND;

BOS;

EID: 84868260191     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.080     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Amon Th., Amon B., Kryvoruchko V., Bodiroza V., Pötsch E., Zollitsch W. Optimising methane yield from anaerobic digestion of manure: effects of dairy systems and of glycerine supplementation. International Congress Series 2006, 1293:217-220.
2. Amon T., Amon B., Kryvoruchko V., Zollitsch W., Mayer K., Gruber L. Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure e influence of biomass composition on the methane yield. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2007, 118:173-182.
3. Angelidaki I., Ellegaard L. Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2003, 109:95-105.
4. APHA, AWWA, WEF, 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. Washington, D.C.
5. Astals S., Ariso M., Galí A., Mata-Alvarez J. Co-digestion of pig manure and glycerine: experimental and modelling study. Journal of Environmental Management 2011, 92(4):1091-1096.
6. Astals S., Nolla-Ardèvol V., Mata-Alvarez J. Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: biogas and digestate. Bioresource Technology 2012, 110:63-70.
7. Asam Z., Poulse T.G., Nizami A., Rafíque R., Kiely G., Murphy J.D. How can we improve biomethane production per unit of feedstock in biogas plants?. Applied Energy 2011, 88(6):2013-2018.
8. Bruni E., Jensen A.P., Pedersen E.S., Angelidaki I. Anaerobic digestion of maize focusing on variety, harvest time and pre-treatment. Applied Energy 2010, 87(7):2212-2217.
9. Callaghan F.J., Wase D.A.J., Thayanithy K., Forster C.F. Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure. Biomass and Bioenergy 2002, 22(1):71-77.
10. Castrillón L., Vázquez I., Marañon E., Sastre H. Anaerobic thermophilic treatment of cattle manure in UASB reactors. Waste Management & Research 2002, 20:350-356.
11. Castrillón L., Fernández-Nava Y., Ormaechea P., Marañón E. Optimization of biogas production from cattle manure by pre-treatment with ultrasounds and codigestion with raw glycerin. Bioresource Technology 2011, 102(17):7845-7849.
12. Cavinato C., Fatone F., Bolzonella, Pavan P. Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure with agro-wastes and energy crops: comparison of pilot and full scale experiences. Bioresource Technology 2010, 101:545-550.
13. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC.
14. Dustin, J.S., 2010. Fundamentals of Operation of the Induced Bed Reactor (IBR) Anaerobic Digester. Paper 554. Utah State University. http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/554.
15. Fang C., Boe K., Angelidaki I. Anaerobic co-digestion of by-products from sugar production with cow manure. Water Research 2011, 45(11):3473-3480.
16. Fountoulakis I., Petousi T., Manios M.S. Co-digestion of sewage sludge with glycerol to boost biogas production. Waste Management 2010, 30(10):1849-1853.
17. Hansen, C.L., Hansen, C.S., 2005. Induced Sludge Bed Anaerobic Reactor. Patent No. US 6, 911, 149 B2, Utah State University, UT (US).
18. Lebuhn M., Liu F., Heuwinkel H., Gronauer A. Biogas production from monodigestion of maize silage-long term process stability and requirements. Water Science Technology 2008, 58:1645-1651.
19. Lehtomäki A., Hunttunen S., Rintala J.A. Laboratory investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: effect of crop to manure ratio. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2007, 51(3):591-609.
20. Li Y., Park S.Y., Zhu J. Solid state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011, 15:821-826.
21. Marañón E., Castrillón L., Vázquez I., Sastre H. The influence of hydraulic residence time on treatment of cattle manure in UASB reactors. Waste Management & Research 2001, 19:436-441.
22. Oslaj M., Mursec B., Vindis P. Biogas production from maize hybrids. Biomass and Bioenergy 2010, 34(11):1538-1545.
23. Robra S., Serpa da Cruz R., de Oliveira A.M., Almeida Neto J.A., Santos J.V. Generation of biogas using crude glycerin from biodiesel production as a supplement to cattle slurry. Biomass and Bioenergy 2010, 34:1330-1335.
24. Schittenhelm S. Chemical composition and methane yield of maize hybrids with contrasting maturity. European Journal of Agronomy 2008, 29(2-3):72-79.
25. Schievano A., D'Imporzano G., Adani F. Substituting energy crops with organic wastes and agro-industrial residues for biogas production. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:2537-2541.
26. Siles J.A., Martín M.A., Chica A.F., Martín A. Anaerobic digestion of glycerol derived from biodiesel manufacturing. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100:5609-5615.