A Kriging constrained efficient global optimization approach applied to low-energy building design problems

Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1101-1114

  Gengembre, E ^a   Ladevie, B ^b   Fudym, O ^b   Thuillier, A ^a  

^a Parc Scientifique du Perge   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

building energy demand; building thermal design; efficient global optimization; Kriging

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONSTRAINTS; BUILDING DESIGN; BUILDING ENERGY; BUILDING THERMAL SIMULATION; CONSTRAINT FUNCTIONS; DESIGN PARAMETERS; DESIGN PROCESS; EFFICIENT GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; ENERGY DEMANDS; EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS; KRIGING; LOW ENERGY BUILDINGS; META MODEL; OPTIMAL DESIGN; OPTIMAL VALUES; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM; RESPONSE FUNCTIONS; SAMPLE SELECTION; STOCHASTIC RESPONSE; THERMAL DESIGNS; TIME-CONSUMING TASKS; TOTAL COSTS;

ALGORITHMS; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; INTERPOLATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION (PSO); SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

FUNCTION EVALUATION;

EID: 84868256265     PISSN: 17415977     EISSN: 17415985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17415977.2012.727084     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Wetter, M. GenOpt a generic optimization program, Proceedings of the 7th International Building Simulation Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2001
2. Jaffal, I, Inard, C and Ghiaus, C. 2009. Fast method to predict building heating demand based on the design of experiments. Energy Build., 41: 669-677.
3. Pernodet, F, Lahmidi, H and Miche, P. Use of Genetic Algorithms for Multicriteria Optimization of Building Refurbishment, Proceedings of the 11th International Building Simulation Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, 2009
4. Jones, DR, Schonlau, M and Welch, WJ. 1998. Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J. Global Optim., 13: 455-492.
5. Matheron, G. 1963. Principles of geostatistics. Econ. Geol., 58: 1246-1266.
6. Jones, DR. 2001. A taxonomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces. J. Global Optim., 21: 345-383.
7. Forrester, AIJ and Keane, AJ. 2009. Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Progr. Aerosp. Sci., 45: 50-79.
8. Réglementation Thermique 2005: Méthode de calcul Th-CE, CSTB, 2006. Available at www.rt-batiment.fr/fileadmin/documents/RT2005/pdf/Methode_Th_CE.pdf, last access 20/02/12
9. Parr, JM, Holden, CME, Forrester, AIJ and Keanea, AJ. Review of Efficient Surrogate Infill Sampling Criteria with Constraint Handling, Second International Conference on Engineering Optimization, Lisbon, Portugal, 2010
10. Birge, B. PSOt, A Particle Swarm Optimization Toolbox for Matlab, IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium Proceedings, Indianapolis, IN, 2003
11. Wetter, M and Wright, J. 2004. A comparison of deterministic and probabilistic optimization algorithms for nonsmooth simulation-based optimization. Build. Environ., 39: 989-999.
12. Mockus, J. 1994. Application of Bayesian approach to numerical methods of global and stochastic optimization. J. Global Optim., 4: 347-365.
13. Audet, C, Dennis, J, Moore, D, Booker, A and Frank, P. Surrogate-model-based Method for Constrained Optimization-LACSI at Rice University, AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, CA, 2000
14. Pillet, M. 1997. Les Plans d'expériences par la Méthode Taguchi, Paris: Les Editions d'organisation.
15. Sasena, MJ. Flexibility and efficiency enhancements for constrained global design optimization with Kriging approximations, Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan, MI, 2002