Geographic divergence in a species-rich symbiosis: Interactions between Monterey pines and ectomycorrhizal fungi

Ecology

Volumn 93, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 2274-2285

  Hoeksema, Jason D ^a   Hernandez, Jesus Vargas ^b   Rogers, Deborah L ^c   Mendoza, Luciana Luna ^d,e   Thompson, John N ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^b Colegio de Postgraduados ^*  (Mexico)

^c Center for Natural Lands Management   (United States)

^d Avenida Moctezuma 836 Zona Centro   (Mexico)

^e UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Coevolution; Ectomycorrhizal fungi; Geographic divergence; Monterey pine; Multispecific mutualism; Pinus radiata

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS ALLOCATION; COEVOLUTION; ECTOMYCORRHIZA; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FUNGUS; GENOTYPE; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTION; INOCULATION; NATIVE SPECIES; SEEDLING; SPECIES RICHNESS; SYMBIOSIS; TREE;

EID: 84868236127     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/11-1715.1     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ashkannejhad, S., and T. R. Horton. 2006. Ectomycorrhizal ecology under primary succession on coastal sand dunes: interactions involving Pinus contorta, suilloid fungi and deer. New Phytologist 169:345-354.
2. Axelrod, D. I. 1980. History of the maritime closed-cone pines, Alta and Baja California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
3. Baar, J., T. R. Horton, A. M. Kretzer, and T. D. Bruns. 1999. Mycorrhizal colonization of Pinus muricata from resistant propagules after a stand-replacing wildfire. New Phytologist 143:409-418. (Pubitemid 29404884)
4. Bever, J. D., S. C. Richardson, B. M. Lawrence, J. Holmes, and M. Watson. 2009. Preferential allocation to beneficial symbiont with spatial structure maintains mycorrhizal mutualism. Ecology Letters 12:13-21.
5. Bidartondo, M. I., J. Baar, and T. D. Bruns. 2001. Low ectomycorrhizal inoculum potential and diversity from soils in and near ancient forests of bristlecone pine (Pinus longaeva). Canadian Journal of Botany 79:293-299. (Pubitemid 32333571)
6. Colwell, R. K. 2009. EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8.2. User's guide and application. http://purl.oclc.org/estimates
7. Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
8. Gardes, M., and T. D. Bruns. 1996. Community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Pinus muricata forest: above-and below-ground views. Canadian Journal of Botany 74:1572-1583.
9. Gotelli, N. J., and R. K. Colwell. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4:379-391. (Pubitemid 32752218)
10. Grogan, P., J. Baar, and T. D. Bruns. 2000. Below-ground ectomycorrhizal community structure in a recently burned bishop pine forest. Journal of Ecology 88:1051-1062. (Pubitemid 32097521)
11. Grubisha, L. C., J. M. Trappe, A. R. Beyerle, and D. Wheeler. 2005. NATS truffle and truffle-like fungi 12: Rhizopogon ater sp nov and R. brunsii sp nov (Rhizopogonaceae, Basidiomycota). Mycotaxon 93:345-353. (Pubitemid 41730732)
12. Grubisha, L. C., J. M. Trappe, R. Molina, and J. W. Spatafora. 2002. Biology of the ectomycorrhizal genus Rhizopogon. VI. Re-examination of infrageneric relationships inferred from phylogenetic analyses of ITS sequences. Mycologia 94:607-619. (Pubitemid 34850415)
13. Guimaraes, P. R., P. Jordano, and J. N. Thompson. 2011. Evolution and coevolution within mutualistic networks. Ecology Letters 14:877-885.
14. Hereford, J. 2009. A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. American Naturalist 173:579-588.
15. Hijmans, R. J., S. E. Cameron, J. L. Parra, P. G. Jones, and A. Jarvis. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25:1965-1978. (Pubitemid 43013915)
16. Hoeksema, J. D. 2010. Tansley review. Ongoing coevolution in mycorrhizal interactions. New Phytologist 187:286-300.
17. Hoeksema, J. D., et al. 2010. A meta-analysis of contextdependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology Letters 13:394-407.
18. Hoeksema, J. D., B. Piculell, and J. N. Thompson. 2009. Within-population genetic variability in mycorrhizal interactions. Communicative and Integrative Biology 2:110-112.
19. Hoeksema, J. D., and J. N. Thompson. 2007. Geographic structure in a widespread plant-mycorrhizal interaction: pines and false truffles. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20:1148-1163. (Pubitemid 46663136)
20. Horton, T. R., and T. D. Bruns. 1998. Multiple-host fungi are the most frequent and abundant ectomycorrhizal types in a mixed stand of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and bishop pine (Pinus muricata). New Phytologist 139:331-339. (Pubitemid 28320651)
21. Horton, T. R., and T. D. Bruns. 2001. The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: peeking into the black box. Molecular Ecology 10:1855-1871. (Pubitemid 32792442)
22. Hughes, A. L., and M. Nei. 1988. Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class-I loci reveals overdominant selection. Nature 335:167-170.
23. Izzo, A., D. T. Nguyen, and T. D. Bruns. 2006. Spatial structure and richness of ectomycorrhizal fungi colonizing bioassay seedlings from resistant propagules in a Sierra Nevada forest: comparisons using two hosts that exhibit different seedling establishment patterns. Mycologia 98:374-383. (Pubitemid 44440913)
24. Jones, M. D., and S. E. Smith. 2004. Exploring functional definitions of mycorrhizas: Are mycorrhizas always mutualisms? Canadian Journal of Botany 82:1089-1109. (Pubitemid 39501016)
25. Kiers, E. T., and M. G. A. Van Der Heijden. 2006. Mutualistic stability in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: exploring hypotheses of evolutionary cooperation. Ecology 87:1627-1636. (Pubitemid 44141542)
26. Kjoller, R., and T. D. Bruns. 2003. Rhizopogon spore bank communities within and among California pine forests. Mycologia 95:603-613. (Pubitemid 37231930)
27. Lomolino, M. V., B. R. Riddle, R. J. Whittaker, and J. H. Brown. 2010. Biogeography. Fourth edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
28. May, G., and E. Matzke. 1995. Recombination and variation at the A mating-type of Coprinus cinereus. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12:794-802.
29. McCune, B., and J. B. Grace. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA.
30. Moser, A. M., J. L. Frank, J. A. D'Allura, and D. Southworth. 2009. Ectomycorrhizal communities of Quercus garryana are similar on serpentine and nonserpentine soils. Plant and Soil 315:185-194.
31. Newman, E. J. 1966. A method of estimating the total root length of a root in a sample. Journal of Applied Ecology 3:139-145.
32. Piculell, B. J., J. D. Hoeksema, and J. N. Thompson. 2008. Interactions of biotic and abiotic environmental factors in an ectomycorrhizal symbiosis, and the potential for selection mosaics. BMC Biology 6:23.
33. Rogers, D. L., J. J. V. Hernandez, A. C. Matheson, and J. J. G. Santos. 2005. Conserving the pines of Guadalupe and Cedros Islands, Mexico: an international collaboration. Pages 31-53 in A. Romero and S. West, editors. Environmental issues in Latin America and the Caribbean. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
34. Rusca, T. A., P. G. Kennedy, and T. D. Bruns. 2006. The effect of different pine hosts on the sampling of Rhizopogon spore banks in five eastern Sierra Nevada forests. New Phytologist 170:551-560.
35. Schluter, D. 2009. Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science 323:737-741.
36. Siepielski, A. M., and C. W. Benkman. 2007. Convergent patterns in the selection mosaic for two North American bird-dispersed pines. Ecological Monographs 77:203-220. (Pubitemid 351342498)
37. Taylor, D. L., and T. D. Bruns. 1999. Community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Pinus muricata forest: minimal overlap between the mature forest and resistant propagule communities. Molecular Ecology 8:1837-1850. (Pubitemid 30036918)
38. Thompson, J. N. 1994. The coevolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
39. Thompson, J. N. 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
40. Thompson, J. N., and B. M. Cunningham. 2002. Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection. Nature 417:735-738. (Pubitemid 34640625)
41. Thompson, J. N., A. L. Laine, and J. F. Thompson. 2010. Retention of mutualism in a geographically diverging interaction. Ecology Letters 13:1368-1377.
42. Tilman, D. 1988. Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
43. Walker, J. F., O. K. Miller, and J. L. Horton. 2005. Hyperdiversity of ectomycorrhizal fungus assemblages on oak seedlings in mixed forests in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Molecular Ecology 14:829-838. (Pubitemid 40346474)
44. Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.