Transpulmonary thermodilution: The jury is out

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 40, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3109-

  Hooper, Michael Hee ^a   Marik, Paul E ^a  

^a Eastern Virginia School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; EARLY INTERVENTION; FLUID RESUSCITATION; HUMAN; LETTER; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; SHOCK; THERMODILUTION; TRANSPULMONARY THERMODILUTION; URINE VOLUME;

CARDIAC OUTPUT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PULMONARY WEDGE PRESSURE; SHOCK; SHOCK, SEPTIC;

EID: 84868229999     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826532d5     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Trof RJ, Beishuizen A, Cornet AD, et al: Volumelimited versus pressure-limited hemodynamic management in septic and nonseptic shock. Crit Care Med 2012; 40:1177-1185
2. Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, et al: Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: A positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med 2011; 39:259-265
3. Murphy CV, Schramm GE, Doherty JA, et al: The importance of fluid management in acute lung injury secondary to septic shock. Chest 2009; 136:102-109
4. National Heart L, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network, Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, et al: Comparison of two fluidmanagement strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:2564-2575