The association between specialty match and third-year clerkship performance

Military Medicine

Volumn 177, Issue SUPPL.1, 2012, Pages 47-52

  Saguil, Aaron ^a   Balog, Erin K ^b   Goldenberg, Matthew N ^b   Dong, Ting ^a   Artino, Anthony R ^a   Zahn, Christopher M ^b   Servey, Jessica T ^a   Matthew Ritter, E ^a   Welling, David R ^a   Ramsay, Laura B ^b   Ming, Gerald ^a   Durning, Steven J ^a  

^a Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences   (United States)

^b UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;

ADULT; CAREER CHOICE; CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84868229570     PISSN: 00264075     EISSN: 1930613X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7205/milmed-d-12-00239     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Center for Workforce Studies: The Complexities of Physician Supply and Demand: Projections Through 2025. Washington, DC, Association of American Medical Colleges, 2008.
2. Matsumoto M, Inoue K, Bowman R, Noguchi S, Toyokawa S, Kajii E: Geographical distributions of physicians in Japan and US: Impact of healthcare system on physician dispersal pattern. Health Policy 2010; 96: 255-61.
3. The Robert Graham Center: Specialty and Geographic Distribution of the Physician Workforce: What Influences Medical Student and Resident Choices? Washington, DC, American Academy of Family Physicians, 2009.
4. WWAMI Rural Health Research Center: Policy Brief: The Crisis in Rural General Surgery. Seattle, WA, University of Washington School of Medicine, 2009.
5. WWAMI Rural Health Research Center: The Future of Family Medicine and Implications for Rural Primary Care Physician Supply. Final Report no. 125. Seattle, WA, University of Washington School of Medicine, 2010.
6. Shipman SA, Lan J, Chang C, Goodman DC: Geographic maldistribution of primary care for children. Pediatrics 2011; 127: 19-27.
7. American College of Physicians: Solutions to the Challenges Facing Primary Care Medicine. Philadelphia, PA, American College of Physicians, 2009.
8. Committee on Improving the Organization of the US Department of Health and Human Service to Advance the Health of Our Population, Institute of Medicine: HHS in the 21st Century: Charting a New Course for a Healthier America. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 2009.
9. Dorsey ER, Nicholson S, Frist WH: Commentary: improving the supply and distribution of primary care physicians. Acad Med 2011; 86: 541-3.
10. Center for Workforce Studies: 2008 Physician Specialty Data. Washington, DC, Association of American Medical Colleges, 2008.
11. The White House: The Affordable Care Act. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/healthreform/healthcare-overview; accessed January 15, 2012.
12. Colwill JM, Cultice JM, Kruse RL: Will generalist physician supply meet demands of an increasing and aging population? Health Aff (Millwood) 2008; 3: w232-41.
13. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: National Health Service Corps. Available at http://nhsc.hrsa.gov; accessed January 15, 2012.
14. Reynolds PP: A legislative history of federal assistance for health professions training in primary care medicine and dentistry in the United States, 1963-2008. Acad Med 2008; 83: 1004-14.
15. Woodward CA, McAuley RG: Characteristics of medical students who choose primary care as a career: the McMaster experience. Can Med Assoc J 1984; 130: 129-31.
16. Senf JH, Campos-Outcalt D, Kutob R: Factors related to the choice of family medicine: a reassessment and literature review. J Am Board Fam Pract 2003; 16: 502-12.
17. Bennett KL, Phillips JP: Finding, recruiting, and sustaining the future primary care physician workforce: a new theoretical model of specialty choice process. Acad Med 2010; 85: S81-8.
18. Maiorova T, Stevens F, Scherpbier A, van der Zee J: The impact of clerkships on students' specialty preferences: what do undergraduates learn for their profession? Med Educ 2008; 42: 554-62.
19. Jeffe DB, Whelan AJ, Andriole DA: Primary care specialty choices of United States medical graduates, 1997-2006. Acad Med 2010; 85: 947-58.
20. Scott I, Gowans M, Wright B, Brenneis F, Banner S, Boone J: Determinants of choosing a career in family medicine. CMAJ 2011; 183: E1-8.
21. Hauer KE, Durning SJ, Kernan WN, et al: Factors associated with medical students' career choices regarding internal medicine. JAMA 2008; 300: 1154-64.
22. Kaplowitz PB, Boyle R, Lu J: The effect of the pediatric clerkship on medical student attitudes toward pediatrics at 11 medical schools. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1996; 150: 435-9.
23. American Academy of Family Physicians: Survey: active FMIGs may boost family medicine match rates. AAFP News Now, December 23, 2005. Available at http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/publications/news/news-now/archive/fmigs.html; accessed January 15, 2012.
24. Baraka SM, Ebell MH: Family medicine interest groups at US medical schools. Fam Med 1995; 27: 437-9.
25. Kerr JR, Seaton MB, Zimcik H, McCabe J, Feldman K: The impact of interest: how do family medicine interest groups influence medical students? Can Fam Physician 2008; 54: 78-9.
26. Jeffrey J, Dumont RA, Kim GY, Kuo T: Effects of international health electives on medical student learning and career choice: results of a systematic literature review. Fam Med 2011; 43: 21-8.
27. McLaughlin MA, Daugherty SR, Rose WH, Goodman LJ: Specialty choice during the clinical years: a prospective study. Acad Med 1993; 68: S55-7.
28. Pamies RJ, Woodard LJ, Blair CR, Roetzheim RG, Herold AH: The influence on students' specialty selections of faculty evaluations and mini-board scores during third-year clerkships. Acad Med 1992; 67: 127-9.
29. Hodges BD, Kuper A: Theory and practice in the design and conduct of graduate medical education. Acad Med 2012; 87: 25-33.
30. Mann KV: Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities. Med Educ 2011; 45: 60-8.
31. National Resident Matching Program: Results and Data: 2011 Main Residency Match. Washington, DC, National Resident Matching Program, 2011.
32. Lave J, Wenger E: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York, NY, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
33. National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program, Results and Data: 2011 Main Residency Match. Washington, DC, 2011.