Assessing errors in variational Dual-Doppler wind syntheses of supercell thunderstorms observed by storm-scale mobile radars

Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1009-1025

  Potvin, Corey K ^a   Wicker, Louis J ^a   Shapiro, Alan ^b  

^a NATIONAL SEVERE STORMS LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Continuity equation; Radars Radar observations; Supercells; Variational analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE ANALYSIS; BEHAVIOR-BASED; CLOSE RANGE; CONTINUITY EQUATIONS; CONVECTIVE STORMS; DYNAMICAL ANALYSIS; HIGH RESOLUTION; KINEMATICS AND DYNAMICS; MOBILE RADARS; OBSERVING SYSTEM SIMULATION EXPERIMENTS; QUALITATIVE FEATURES; RADAR OBSERVATIONS; REAR-FLANK; SCANNING STRATEGIES; STORM BEHAVIOR; SUPER CELL; SUPERCELL DYNAMICS; SUPERCELL THUNDERSTORMS; VARIATIONAL ANALYSIS; VARIATIONAL DATA ASSIMILATION; WIND RETRIEVALS;

ATMOSPHERIC MOVEMENTS; DOPPLER RADAR; THREE DIMENSIONAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; THUNDERSTORMS;

ERRORS;

ATMOSPHERIC CONVECTION; DOPPLER RADAR; ERROR ANALYSIS; HYDROMETEOROLOGY; NUMERICAL MODEL; SUPERCELL; SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR; THUNDERSTORM; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; WIND;

EID: 84868218000     PISSN: 07390572     EISSN: 15200426     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00177.1     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Barnes, S. L., 1964: A technique for maximizing details in numerical weather map analysis. J. Appl. Meteor., 3, 396-409.
2. Beck, J. R., J. L. Schroeder, and J. M. Wurman, 2006: Highresolution dual-Doppler analyses of the 29 May 2001 Kress, Texas, cyclic supercell. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 3125-3148.
3. Cai, H., and R. M. Wakimoto, 2001: Retrieved pressure field and its influence on the propagation of a supercell thunderstorm. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2695-2713.
4. Clark, T. L., F. I. Harris, and C. G. Mohr, 1980: Errors in wind fields derived from multiple-Doppler radars: Random errors and temporal errors associated with advection and evolution. J. Appl. Meteor., 19, 1273-1284.
5. Coniglio, M. C., D. J. Stensrud, and L. J. Wicker, 2006: Effects of upper-level shear on the structure and maintenance of strong quasi-linear mesoscale convective systems. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1231-1252.
6. Cressman, G. P., 1959: An operational objective analysis system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 87, 367-374.
7. Doviak, R. J., P. S. Ray, R. G. Strauch, and L. J. Miller, 1976: Error estimation in wind fields derived from dual-Doppler radar measurement. J. Appl. Meteor., 15, 868-878.
8. Dowell, D. C., and H. B. Bluestein, 2002a: The 8 June 1995 McLean, Texas, storm. Part I: Observations of cyclic tornadogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2626-2648.
9. Dowell, D. C., and H. B. Bluestein, 2002b: The 8 June 1995 McLean, Texas, storm. Part II: Cyclic tornado formation, maintenance, and dissipation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2649-2670.
10. Frame, J., P. Markowski, Y. Richardson, J. Straka, and J. Wurman, [2009:] Polarimetric and dual-Doppler radar observations of the Lipscomb County, Texas, supercell thunderstorm on [23] May 2002. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 544-561.
11. Gao, J., M. Xue, A. Shapiro, and K. K. Droegemeier, 1999: A variational method for the analysis of three-dimensional wind fields from two Doppler radars. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127, 2128-2142.
12. Given, T., and P. S. Ray, 1994: Response of a two-dimensional dual-Doppler radar wind synthesis. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., [11,] 239-255.
13. Jorgensen, D. P., and B. F. Smull, 1993: Mesovortex circulations seen by airborne Doppler radar within a bow-echo mesoscale convective system. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 74, 2146-2157.
14. Joss, J., and A. Waldvogel, 1970: Raindrop size distribution and Doppler velocities. Preprints, 14th Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Tucson, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 153-156.
15. Kessinger, C. J., P. S. Ray, and C. E. Hane, 1987: The Oklahoma squall line of 19 May 1977. Part I:Amultiple Doppler analysis of convective and stratiform structure. J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 2840-2865.
16. Knupp, K. R., 1996: Structure and evolution of a long-lived, microburst-producing storm. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 2785-2806
17. Koch, S. E., M. desJardins, and P. J. Kocin, 1983: An interactive Barnes objective map analysis scheme for use with satellite and conventional data. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22, 1487-1503
18. Lee, W.-C., R. E. Carbone, and R. M. Wakimoto, 1992: The evolution and structure of a "bow-echo-microburst"event. Part I: The microburst. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 2188-2210.
19. Majcen, M., P. Markowski, Y. Richardson, D. Dowell, and J. Wurman, 2008: Multipass objective analyses of Doppler radar data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 25, 1845-1858.
20. Mansell, E. R., C. L. Ziegler, and E. C. Bruning, 2010: Simulated electrification of a small thunderstorm with two-moment bulk microphysics. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 171-194.
21. Markowski, P., and Coauthors, 2012: The pretornadic phase of the Goshen County, Wyoming, supercell of 5 June 2009 intercepted by VORTEX2. Part II: Intensification of low-level rotation. Mon. Wea Rev., in press.
22. Marquis, J., Y. Richardson, J. Wurman, and P. Markowski, 2008: Single- and dual-Doppler analysis of a tornadic vortex and surrounding storm-scale flow in the Crowell, Texas, supercell of 30 April 2000. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 5017-5043.
23. Matejka, T., and D. L. Bartels, 1998: The accuracy of vertical air velocities from Doppler radar data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 92-117.
24. O'Brien, J. J., 1970: Alternative solutions to the classical vertical velocity problem. J. Appl. Meteor., 9, 197-203.
25. Potvin, C.K., D. Betten, L. J.Wicker, K.L.Elmore, andM. I.Biggerstaff, [2012:] 3DVAR vs. traditional dual-Doppler wind retrievals of a simulated supercell thunderstorm. Mon. Wea. Rev., in press.
26. Potvin, C.K., A. Shapiro, and M. Xue, 2012b: Impact of a vertical vorticity constraint in variational dual-Doppler wind analysis: Tests with real and simulated supercell data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 29, 32-49.
27. Ray, P. S., K. K. Wagner, K. W. Johnson, J. J. Stephens, W. C. Bumgarner, and E. A. Mueller, 1978: Triple-Doppler observations of a convective storm. J. Appl. Meteor., 17, 1201-1212
28. W. C. Bumgarner, C. L. Ziegler, W. Bumgarner, and R. J. Serafin, 1980: Singleand multiple-Doppler radar observations of tornadic storms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 108, 1607-1625.
29. Raymond, W. H., 1988: High-order low-pass implicit tangent filters for use in finite area calculations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 116, 2132-2141.
30. Shapiro, A., C. K. Potvin, and J. Gao, 2009: Use of a vertical vorticity equation in variational dual-Doppler wind analysis. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 2089-2106.
31. Shapiro, A., K. M. Willingham, and C. K. Potvin, 2010a: Spatially variable advection correction of radar data. Part I: Theoretical considerations. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 3445-3456.
32. Shapiro, A., K. M. Willingham, and C. K. Potvin, 2010b: Spatially variable advection correction of radar data. Part II: Test results. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 3457-3470
33. Taylor, G. I., 1938: The spectrum of turbulence. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, 164A, 476-490.
34. Trapp, R. J., and C. A. Doswell, 2000: Radar data objective analysis. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 17, 105-120.
35. Wakimoto, R. M., C. Liu, and H. Cai, 1998: The Garden City, Kansas, storm during VORTEX 95. Part I: Overview of the storm's life cycle and mesocyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 372-392.
36. Weisman, M. L., and J. B. Klemp, 1982: The dependence of numerically simulated convective storms on vertical wind shear and buoyancy. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 504-520.
37. Weisman, M. L., and J. B. Klemp, 1984: The structure and classification of numerically simulated convective storms in directionally varying wind shears. Mon. Wea. Rev., 112, 2479-2498.
38. Wicker, L. J., and W. C. Skamarock, 2002: Time-splitting methods for elastic models using forward time schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2088-2097.
39. Wood, V. T., R. A. Brown, and D. C. Dowell, 2009: Simulated WSR-88D velocity and reflectivity signatures of numerically modeled tornadoes. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 876-890
40. Wurman, J., J. Straka, E. Rasmussen, M. Randall, and A. Zahrai, [1997:] Design and deployment of a portable, pencil-beam, pulsed, 3-cm Doppler radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 14, 1502-1512.
41. Wurman, J., Y. Richardson, C. Alexander, S. Weygandt, and P. F. Zhang, [2007:] Dual-Doppler analysis of winds and vorticity budget terms near a tornado. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 2392-2405.
42. Ziegler, C. L., 1985: Retrieval of thermal and microphysical variables in observed convective storms. Part 1: Model development and preliminary testing. J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 1487-1509.
43. Ziegler, C. L., E. N. Rasmussen, T. R. Shepherd, A. I. Watson, and J. M. Straka, 2001: The evolution of low-level rotation in the 29 May 1994 Newcastle-Graham, Texas, storm complex during VORTEX. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 1339-1368.