The association between radiographic severity and pre-operative function in patients undergoing primary knee replacement for osteoarthritis

Knee

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 860-865

  Dowsey, Michelle M ^a   Dieppe, Paul ^b   Lohmander, Stefan ^c   Castle, David ^a   Liew, Danny ^d   Choong, Peter F M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b PENINSULA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d ROYAL MELBOURNE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Osteoarthritis; Pre operative function; Radiographic OA severity; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERNATIONAL KNEE SOCIETY RATING SCALE; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PAIN; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OSTEOPHYTE; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SHORT FORM 12; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; OSTEOPHYTE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84868212557     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: 18735800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Mathers C., Vos E., Stevenson C., Begg S. The Australian burden of disease study: measuring the loss of health from diseases, injuries and risk factors. Med J Aust 2000, 172:592-596.
2. Wang Y., Simpson J.A., Wluka A.E., Teichtahl A.J., English D.R., Giles G.G., et al. Relationship between body adiposity measures and risk of primary knee and hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther 2009, 11(2):R31.
3. Fitzgerald J.D., Orav E.J., Lee T.H., Marcantonio E.R., Poss R., Goldman L., et al. Patient quality of life during the 12 months following joint replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 51(1):100-109.
4. Jones C.A., Beaupre L.A., Johnston D.W., Suarez-Almazor M.E. Total joint arthroplasties: current concepts of patient outcomes after surgery. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2007, 33(1):71-86.
5. Shields R.K., Enloe L.J., Leo K.C. Health related quality of life in patients with total hip or knee replacement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999, 80(5):572-579.
6. Brander V.A., Stulberg S.D., Adams A.D., Harden R.N., Bruehl S., Stanos S.P., et al. Predicting total knee replacement pain: a prospective, observational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 416:27-36.
7. Dickstein R., Heffes Y., Shabtai E.I., Markowitz E. Total knee arthroplasty in the elderly: patients' self-appraisal 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Gerontology 1998, 44(4):204-210.
8. Jones C.A., Voaklander D.C., Johnston D.W., Suarez-Almazor M.E. Health related quality of life outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community based population. J Rheumatol 2000, 27(7):1745-1752.
9. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report. Hip and knee replacement from September 1999 to December 2007. Adelaide: AOA Accessed 6th September 2010. http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/publications.jsp.
10. Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., Mowat F., Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89(4):780-785.
11. Gossec L., Hawker G., Davis A.M., Maillefert J.F., Lohmander L.S., Altman R., et al. OMERACT/OARSI initiative to define states of severity and indication for joint replacement in hip and knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2007, 34(6):1432-1435.
12. Odding E., Valkenburg H.A., Algra D., Vandenouweland F.A., Grobbee D.E., Hofman A. The association of abnormalities on physical examination of the hip and knee with locomotor disability in the Rotterdam Study. Br J Rheumatol 1996, 35(9):884-890.
13. Rosemann T., Laux G., Kuehlein T. Osteoarthritis and functional disability: results of a cross sectional study among primary care patients in Germany. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007, 8:79.
14. Fortin P.R., Clarke A.E., Joseph L., Liang M.H., Tanzer M., Ferland D., et al. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum 1999, 42(8):1722-1728.
15. Fortin P.R., Penrod J.R., Clarke A.E., St-Pierre Y., Joseph L., Belisle P., et al. Timing of total joint replacement affects clinical outcomes among patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Arthritis Rheum 2002, 46(12):3327-3330.
16. Kennedy L.G., Newman J.H., Ackroyd C.E., Dieppe P.A. When should we do knee replacements?. Knee 2003, 10(2):161-166.
17. Lingard E.A., Katz J.N., Wright E.A., Sledge C.B. Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A(10):2179-2186.
18. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., Scott W.N. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248:13-14.
19. Ware J., Kosinski M., Keller S.D. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996, 34(3):220-233.
20. Davies A.P. Rating systems for total knee replacement. Knee 2002, 9(4):261-266.
21. Bach C.M., Nogler M., Steingruber I.E., Ogon M., Wimmer C., Gobel G., et al. Scoring systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 399:184-196.
22. Andrews G. A brief integer scorer for the SF-12: validity of the brief scorer in Australian community and clinic settings. Aust N Z J Public Health 2002, 26(6):508-510.
23. Lee A., Browne M.O., Villanueva E. Consequences of using SF-12 and RAND-12 when examining levels of well-being and psychological distress. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2008, 42(4):315-323.
24. Dunbar M.J., Robertsson O., Ryd L., Lidgren L. Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty. Results of a survey of 3600 patients from The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001, 83(3):339-344.
25. Sanderson K., Andrews G. The SF-12 in the Australian population: cross-validation of item selection. Aust N Z J Public Health 2002, 26(4):343-345.
26. Hsu R.W., Himeno S., Coventry M.B., Chao E.Y. Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990, 255:215-227.
27. Viera A.J., Garrett J.M. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005, 37(5):360-363.
28. Kellgren J.H., Lawrence J.S. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957, 16(4):494-502.
29. Altman R.D., Gold G.E. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007, 15(Suppl. A):A1-A56.
30. Dieppe P.A., Reichenbach S., Williams S., Gregg P., Watt I., Juni P. Assessing bone loss on radiographs of the knee in osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Rheum 2005, 52(11):3536-3541.
31. Dieppe P., Judge A., Williams S., Ikwueke I., Guenther K.P., Floeren M., et al. Variations in the pre-operative status of patients coming to primary hip replacement for osteoarthritis in European orthopaedic centres. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009, 10:19.
32. Cicuttini F.M., Baker J., Hart D.J., Spector T.D. Association of pain with radiological changes in different compartments and views of the knee joint. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1996, 4(2):143-147.
33. Lanyon P., O'Reilly S., Jones A., Doherty M. Radiographic assessment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in the community: definitions and normal joint space. Ann Rheum Dis 1998, 57(10):595-601.
34. Yau W.P., Chiu K.Y., Tang W.M., Ng T.P. Residual posterior femoral condyle osteophyte affects the flexion range after total knee replacement. Int Orthop 2005, 29(6):375-379.
35. Ritter M.A., Harty L.D., Davis K.E., Meding J.B., Berend M.E. Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85-A(7):1278-1285.
36. Laubenthal K.N., Smidt G.L., Kettelkamp D.B. A quantitative analysis of knee motion during activities of daily living. Phys Ther 1972, 52(1):34-43.
37. Claessens A.A., Schouten J.S., van den Ouweland F.A., Valkenburg H.A. Do clinical findings associate with radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee?. Ann Rheum Dis 1990, 49(10):771-774.
38. Felson D.T. The epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis: results from the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1990, 20(3 Suppl. 1):42-50.
39. Hart D.J., Spector T.D., Brown P., Wilson P., Doyle D.V., Silman A.J. Clinical signs of early osteoarthritis: reproducibility and relation to X ray changes in 541 women in the general population. Ann Rheum Dis 1991, 50(7):467-470.
40. McAlindon T.E., Cooper C., Kirwan J.R., Dieppe P.A. Determinants of disability in osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Rheum Dis 1993, 52(4):258-262.
41. Odding E., Valkenburg H.A., Algra D., Vandenouweland F.A., Grobbee D.E., Hofman A. Associations of radiological osteoarthritis of the hip and knee with locomotor disability in the Rotterdam Study. Ann Rheum Dis 1998, 57(4):203-208.
42. Mancuso C.A., Ranawat C.S., Esdaile J.M., Johanson N.A., Charlson M.E. Indications for total hip and total knee arthroplasties. Results of orthopaedic surveys. J Arthroplasty 1996, 11(1):34-46.
43. Szebenyi B., Hollander A.P., Dieppe P., Quilty B., Duddy J., Clarke S., et al. Associations between pain, function, and radiographic features in osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 2006, 54(1):230-235.
44. Reichenbach S., Dieppe P.A., Nuesch E., Williams S., Villiger P.M., Juni P. Association of bone attrition with knee pain, stiffness and disability: a cross-sectional study. Ann Rheum Dis 2011, 70(2):293-298.
45. Chang C.B., Koh I.J., Seo E.S., Kang Y.G., Seong S.C., Kim T.K. The radiographic predictors of symptom severity in advanced knee osteoarthritis with varus deformity. Knee 2011, 18(6):456-460.
46. Desmeules F., Dionne C.E., Belzile E., Bourbonnais R., Fremont P. Waiting for total knee replacement surgery: factors associated with pain, stiffness, function and quality of life. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009, 10:52.
47. Ackerman I.N., Graves S.E., Wicks I.P., Bennell K.L., Osborne R.H. Severely compromised quality of life in women and those of lower socioeconomic status waiting for joint replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum 2005, 53(5):653-658.
48. Hoogeboom T.J., van den Ende C.H., van der Sluis G., Elings J., Dronkers J.J., Aiken A.B., et al. The impact of waiting for total joint replacement on pain and functional status: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009, 17(11):1420-1427.
49. Borkhoff C.M., Hawker G.A., Kreder H.J., Glazier R.H., Mahomed N.N., Wright J.G. The effect of patients' sex on physicians' recommendations for total knee arthroplasty. CMAJ 2008, 178(6):681-687.
50. Karlson E.W., Daltroy L.H., Liang M.H., Eaton H.E., Katz J.N. Gender differences in patient preferences may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery. Am J Med 1997, 102(6):524-530.
51. Ackerman I.N., Dieppe P.A., March L.M., Roos E.M., Nilsdotter A.K., Brown G.C., et al. Variation in age and physical status prior to total knee and hip replacement surgery: a comparison of centers in Australia and Europe. Arthritis Rheum 2009, 61(2):166-173.
52. De Guia N., Zhu N., Keresteci M., Shi J.E. Obesity and joint replacement surgery in Canada: findings from the Canadian Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR). Health Policy 2006, 1(3):36-43.
53. Fehring T.K., Odum S.M., Griffin W.L., Mason J.B., McCoy T.H. The obesity epidemic: its effect on total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(6 Suppl. 2):71-76.
54. Liow R.Y., Walker K., Wajid M.A., Bedi G., Lennox C.M. Functional rating for knee arthroplasty: comparison of three scoring systems. Orthopedics 2003, 26(2):143-149.
55. Ritter M.A., Wing J.T., Berend M.E., Davis K.E., Meding J.B. The clinical effect of gender on outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(3):331-336.
56. Kennedy D.M., Hanna S.E., Stratford P.W., Wessel J., Gollish J.D. Preoperative function and gender predict pattern of functional recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21(4):559-566.
57. Franklin P.D., Li W., Ayers D.C. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: functional outcome after total knee replacement varies with patient attributes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466(11):2597-2604.