Surface water quality assessment using self-organizing maps and Hasse diagram technique

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 118, Issue , 2012, Pages 280-286

  Voyslavov, Tsvetomil ^a   Tsakovski, Stefan ^a   Simeonov, Vasil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOFIA   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

Hasse diagram technique; Quality assessment; Self organizing maps; Surface water

Indexed keywords

SURFACE WATER;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BULGARIA; CHEMOMETRIC ANALYSIS; DATA PROCESSING; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HASSE DIAGRAM TECHNIQUE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LAW; MATHEMATICAL PHENOMENA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; RIVER; SELF ORGANIZING MAP OF KOHONEN; WATER QUALITY; WATER SAMPLING;

EID: 84868205052     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: 18733239     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2012.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Astel A., Głosińska G., Sobczyński T., Boszke L., Simeonov V., Siepak J. Chemometrics in assessment of sustainable development rule implementation. CEJCh 2006, 4(3):543-564.
2. Mattikalli N.M. Time series analysis of historical surface water quality data of the River Glen Catchment, UK. Journal of Environmental Management 1996, 46(2):149-172.
3. Cun C., Vilagines R. Time series analysis on chlorides, nitrates, ammonium and dissolved oxygen concentration in the Seine river near Paris. Science of the Total Environment 1997, 208(1-2):59-69.
4. Wunderlin D.A., Diaz M.P., Ame M.V., Pesce S.F., Hued A.C. Pattern recognition techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality. A case study: Suquía River Basin (Córdoba-Argentina). Water Research 2001, 35(12):2881-2894.
5. Götz R., Steiner B., Friesel P., Klaus R., Walkow F., Maaβ V., Reincke H., Stachel B. Dioxin (PCDD/F) in the river Elbe-investigations of their origin by multivariate statistical methods. Chemosphere 1998, 37(9-12):1987-2002.
6. Simeonov V., Einax J.W., Stanimirova I., Kraft I. Environmetric modelling and interpretation of river water monitoring data. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2002, 374(5):898-905.
7. Mendiguchía C., Moreno C., Galindo-Riaňo D.M., García-Vargas M. Using chemometric tools to assess anthropogenic effects in river water. A case study: Guadalquivir (Spain). Analytica Chimica Acta 2004, 515(1):143-149.
8. Stefanov S., Simeonov V., Tsakovski S. Chemometrical analysis of waste water monitoring data from Yantra river basin, Bulgaria. Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry 1999, 70(3):473-482.
9. Kowalkowski T., Zbytniewski R., Szpejna J., Buszewski B. Application of chemometrics in river water classification. Water Research 2006, 40(4):744-752.
10. Tsakovski S., Simeonov V., Stefanov S. Time-series analysis of long-term water quality records from Yantra river basin, Bulgaria. Fresenius Environment Bulletin 1999, 8:28-36.
11. Marengo E., Gennaro M.C., Giacosa D., Abrigo C., Saini G., Avignone M.T. How chemometrics can helpfully assist in evaluating environmental data lagoon water. Analytica Chimica Acta 1995, 317(1-3):53-63.
12. Brodnjak-Vončina D., Dobčnik D., Novič M., Zupan J. Chemometrics characterization of the quality of river water. Analytica Chimica Acta 2002, 462(1):87-100.
13. Astel A., Tsakovski S., Barbieri P., Simeonov V. Comparison of self-organizing maps classification approach with cluster and principal components analysis for large environmental data sets. Water Research 2007, 41(19):4566-4578.
14. Brüggemann R., Halfon E., Welzl G., Voigt K., Steinberg C. Applying the concept of partially ordered sets on the ranking of near-shore sediments by a battery of tests. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science 2001, 41(4):918-925.
15. Hollert H., Heise S., Pudenz S., Brüggemann R., Ahlf W., Braunbeck T. Application of a sediment quality triad and different statistical approaches (Hasse diagrams and fuzzy logic) for the comparative evaluation of small streams. Ecotoxicology 2002, 11(5):311-321.
16. Tsakovski S., Simeonov V. Hasse diagram technique as exploratory tool in sediment pollution assessment. Journal of Chemometrics 2011, 25(5):254-261.
17. Tsakovski S., Astel A., Simeonov V. Assessment of the water quality of a river catchment by chemometric expertise. Journal of Chemometrics 2010, 24(11-12):694-702.
18. Simon U., Brüggemann R., Pudenz S. Aspects of decision support in water management - example Berlin and Potsdam (Germany) I - spatially differentiated evaluation. Water Research 2004, 38(7):1809-1816.
19. Simon U., Brüggemann R., Pudenz S. Aspects of decision support in water management - example Berlin and Potsdam (Germany) II - improvement of management strategies. Water Research 2004, 38(19):4085-4092.
20. Bulgarian State Standards 1985, EN and ISO, Sofia.
21. Bulgarian Ministry of Environment and Water State directive 7 (Surface water quality norms) 1997.
22. Kohonen T. Self-organization and Associative Memory 1984, 78(9):1464-1480. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
23. Vesanto J. SOM-based data visualization methods. Intelligent Data Analysis 1999, 3:111-126.
24. Brüggemann R., Voigt K., Bücherl C. Theoretical base of the program Hasse, GSF-Bericht 20/95, Neuherberg. Software product which may be obtained after personal contact to Dr Brüggemann (e-mail: brg_home@web.de) 1995.
25. DART (Decision Analysis by Ranking Techniques) v.2.05 (accessed 15 March 2012). http://ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/our_labs/computational_toxicology/qsar_tools/DART.
26. Pavan M., Todeschini R. Scientific Data Ranking Methods: Theory and Applications 2008, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
27. Berryman D. État de l'écosystème aquatique du bassin versant de la rivière Yamaska: faits saillants 2004-2006, Québec, ministère du Développement durable, de l'Environnement et des Parcs, Direction du suivi de l'état de l'environnement 2008.