MINLP model for optimizing electricity production from coal-fired power plants considering carbon management

Energy Policy

Volumn 51, Issue , 2012, Pages 493-501

  Cristóbal, Jorge ^a   Guillén Gosálbez, Gonzalo ^b   Jiménez, Laureano ^b   Irabien, Angel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTABRIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI   (Spain)

Author keywords

CO 2 cap and trade; Coal combustion; Electricity production optimization

Indexed keywords

ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGIES; CAP AND TRADE; CARBON MANAGEMENT; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; CONTROL POLICY; COST OF ELECTRICITY; DECISION MAKERS; ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION; EMISSION ALLOWANCES; ENERGY PRODUCTIONS; KYOTO PROTOCOL; MINLP MODELS; MIXED INTEGER; MONOETHANOLAMINE; OXY-FUEL COMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY; POST-COMBUSTION;

CARBON; CARBON CAPTURE; COAL; COAL COMBUSTION; COAL FUELED FURNACES; COMMERCE; COSTS; EMISSION CONTROL; FIRE TUBE BOILERS; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; GREENHOUSE GASES;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; COMBUSTION; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84868203641     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.055     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ackerman F., Biewald B., White D., Woolf T., Moomaw W. Grandfathering and coal plant emissions: the cost of cleaning up the Clean Air Act. Energy Policy 1999, 27:929-940.
2. Baris K. The role of coal in energy policy and sustainable development of Turkey: is it compatible to the EU energy policy?. Energy Policy 2011, 39:1754-1763.
3. Bojarski A.D., Laínez J.M., Espuña A., Puigjaner L. Incorporating environmental impacts and regulations in a holistic supply chains modelling: an LCA approach. Computers and Chemical Engineering 2009, 33:1747-1759.
4. CEC-Commission of the European Communities, 2006. Green Paper: a European strategy for sustainable, competitive and secure energy. COM(2006) 105 final.
5. Cohan D.S., Douglass C. Potential emissions reductions from grandfathered coal power plants in the United States. Energy Policy 2011, 39:4816-4822.
6. Cristóbal J., Albo J., Irabien A. Envieronmental sustainability assessment of electricity from fóssil fuel combustion: carbon footprint. Low Carbon Economy 2010, 1:86-91.
7. 2 capture. Applied Energy 2012, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.03.036.
8. Cristóbal J., Guillén-Gosálbez G., Jiménez L., Irabien A. Optimization of global and local pollution control in electricity production from coal burning. Applied Energy 2012, 92:369-378.
9. Delarue E., Voorspools K., D'haeseleer W. Fuel switching in the electricity sector under the EU ETS: review and prospective. Journal of Energy Engineering 2008, 134(2):40-46.
10. 2-emissions trading: theoretical concepts and empirical findings. Energy & Environment 2003, 14(5):579-597.
11. EP (European Parliament) & EC (European Council) 2001. Directive 2001/80/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 309, 1-21.
12. EP (European Parliament) & EC (European Council), 2003. European Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC.
13. EU-European Union, 2008. Position of the European parliament adopted on 17 December 2008 (EP-PE_TC1-COD(2008)0013).
14. Hildebrand A.N., Herzog H.J. Optimization of carbon capture percentage for technical and economic impact of near-term CCS implementation at coal-fired power plants. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:4135-4142.
15. IChemE-Institution of Chemical Engineers, 2002. The Sustainability Metrics: Sustainable Development Progress Metrics recommended for use in the Process Industries. http://nbis.org/nbisresources/metrics/triple_bottom_line_indicators_process_industries.pdf.
16. IEA-International Energy Agency, 2010. Reviewing existing and proposed emissions trading systems. (last access: 30-11-2011). http://www.iea.org/papers/2010/ets_paper2010.pdf.
17. IEA-International Energy Agency, 2011. CO2 emissions from fuel combustion-Highlights. (last access: 30-11-2011). http://www.iea.org/co2highlights/co2highlights.pdf.
18. IECM-Integrated Environmental Control Model User Documentation, 2001. Center for Energy and Environmental Studies, Carnegie Mellon University: Pittsburgh, PA. http://www.iecm-online.com.
19. Portney P.R. Market-based approaches to environmental policy-a "refresher course". Resources, Summer 2003, 2003:15-18.
20. Riensche E., Nazarki J., Schiebahn S., Weber M., Zhao L., Stolten D. Capture options for coal power plants. Efficient Carbon Capture for Coal Power Plants. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co., KGaA 2011, 45-81. D. Stolten, V. Scherer (Eds.).
21. 2 price caps on electricity investments-a real options analysis. Energy Policy 2008, 36:3974-3981.
22. UN-United Nations, 1998. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf.
23. Von Stechow C., Watson J., Praetorius B. Policy incentives for carbon capture and storage technologies in Europe: a qualitative multi-criteria analysis. Global Environmental Change 2011, 21:346-357.
24. 2 recycle combustion power plant based on life-cycle. Science China Technological Sciences 2010, 53:3284-3293.
25. Xiong J., Zhao H.B., Zheng C.G. Techno-economic evaluation of oxy-combustion coal-fired power plants. Chinese Science Bulletin 2011, 56:3333-3345.
26. Zhang D., Ma L., Liu P., Zhang L., Li Z. A multi-period superstructure optimisation model for the optimal planning of China's power sector considering carbon dioxide mitigation. Energy policy 2012, 41:173-183.