Flow perfusion maintains ex vivo bone viability: A novel model for bone biology research

Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Volumn 6, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 769-776

  Davidson, Edward H ^a   Reformat, Derek D ^a   Allori, Alessandro ^a   Canizares, Orlando ^a   Janelle Wagner, I ^a   Saadeh, Pierre B ^a   Warren, Stephen M ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioreactor; Bone viability; Ex vivo; Flow perfusion; Lacunocanalicular flow

Indexed keywords

BIOCONVERSION; BIOREACTORS; DNA; FLOW OF FLUIDS; HARVESTING; PHOSPHATASES;

'LACUNA'; BIOREACTOR; BONE VIABILITY; DNA QUANTIFICATION; EX-VIVO; FLOW PERFUSION; FLUID-FLOW; LACUNOCANALICULAR; LACUNOCANALICULAR FLOW; OSTEOCYTES;

BONE;

EID: 84868199734     PISSN: 19326254     EISSN: 19327005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/term.478     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bancroft GN, Sikavitsas VI, Mikos AG. 2003; Design of a flow perfusion bioreactor system for bone tissue-engineering applications. Tissue Eng 9(3): 549-554.
2. David V, Guignandon A, Martin A, et al. 2008; Ex vivo bone formation in bovine trabecular bone cultutred in a dynamic 3D bioreactor is enhanced by compressive mechanical strain. Tissue Eng Part A 14(1): 117-126.
3. Du D, Furukawa K, Ushida T. 2007; Oscillatory perfusion seeding and culturing of osteoblast-like cells on porous β-calcium phophate scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 86(3): 796-803.
4. Flannery T, McConnell RS. 2001; Cranioplasty: why throw the bone flap out? Br J Neurosurg 15(6): 518-520.
5. Kaji T, Kawatani R, Hoshino T, et al. 1990; A suitable culture medium for ossification of embryonic chick femur in organ culture. J Bone Miner Res 9(2): 89-100.
6. Roux J, Wegrzyn J, Arlot M, et al. 2009; Contribution of trabecular and cortical components to biomechanical behavior of human vertebrae: an ex vivo study. J Bone Miner Res 25(2): 356-361.
7. Sailon AM, Allori AC, Davidson EH, et al. 2009; A novel flow-perfusion bioreactor supports 3D dynamic cell culture. J Biomed Biotechnol. [Epub ahead of print].
8. Sherr CJ, DePinho RA. 2000; Cellular senescence: mitotic clock or culture shock? Cell 102(4): 407-410.
9. Sikavitsas VI, Bancroft GN, Holtorf HL, et al. 2003; Mineralized matrix deposition by marrow stromal osteoblasts in 3D perfusion culture increases with increasing fluid shear forces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(25): 14683-14688.
10. Sikavitsas VI, Bancroft GN, Lemoine JJ, et al. 2005; Flow perfusion enhances the calcified matrix deposition of marrow stromal cells in biodegradable nonwoven fiber mesh scaffolds. Ann Biomed Eng 33(1): 63-70.
11. Sorkin AM, Dee KC, Knothe Tate ML. 2004; 'Culture shock' from the bone cell's perspective: emulating physiological conditions for mechanobiological investigations. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 287(6): C1527-1536.
12. Weinbaum S, Cowin SC, Zeng Y. 1994; A model for the excitation of osteocytes by mechanical loading-induced bone fluid shear stresses. J Biomech 27: 339-360.
13. Zingale A, Albanese V. 2003; Cryopreservation of autogenous bone flap in cranial surgical practice: what is the future? A grade B and evidence level meta-analytic study. J Neurosurg Sci 47: 137-139.