Risk factors for hypotension in urgently intubated burn patients

Burns

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1181-1185

  Dennis, Christopher J ^a   Chung, Kevin K ^b   Holland, Seth R ^a   Yoon, Brian S ^c   Milligan, Daun J ^a   Nitzschke, Stephanie L ^b   Maani, Christopher V ^b   Hansen, Jacob J ^b   Aden, James K ^b   Renz, Evan M ^b  

^a BROOKE ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b US ARMY INSTITUTE OF SURGICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^c WILLIAM BEAUMONT ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Burns; Critical care; Induction; Intubation; Propofol; Respiratory failure

Indexed keywords

ETOMIDATE; HYPERTENSIVE FACTOR; KETAMINE; MIDAZOLAM; PROPOFOL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY SURFACE; BURN; BURN PATIENT; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; FLUID RESUSCITATION; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEPSIS; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; BURN UNITS; BURNS; CRITICAL CARE; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; HYPOTENSION; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LENGTH OF STAY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SEPSIS; TIME FACTORS; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENTS;

EID: 84868197214     PISSN: 03054179     EISSN: 18791409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. M. Benson, A. Junger, C. Fuchs, L. Quinzio, S. Bottger, and G. Hempelmann Use of an anesthesia information management system (AIMS) to evaluate the physiologic effects of hypnotic agents used to induce anesthesia J Clin Monit 16 2000 183 190
2. M. Lejay, J.L. Hanouz, Y. Lecarpentier, P. Coriat, and B. Riou Modifications of the inotropic responses to alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor stimulation by propofol in rat myocardium Anesth Analg 87 1998 277 283
3. P.S. Pagel, and D.C. Warltier Negative inotropic effects of propofol as evaluated by the regional preload recruitable stroke work relationship in chronically instrumented dogs Anesthesiology 78 1993 100 108
4. C.C. Finnerty, D.N. Herndon, R. Przkora, C.T. Pereira, H.M. Oliveira, and D.M. Queiroz Cytokine expression profile over time in severely burned pediatric patients Shock 26 2006 13 19
5. R. Alvarado, K.C. Chung, L.C. Cancio, and S.E. Wolf Burn resuscitation Burns 35 2009 4 14
6. V. Billard, F. Moulla, J.L. Bourgain, A. Megnigbeto, and D.R. Stanski Hemodynamic response to induction and intubation Anesthesiology 81 1994 1384 1393
7. D.L. Reich, S. Hossain, M. Krol, B. Baez, P. Patel, and A. Bernstein Predictors of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia Anesth Analg 101 2005 622 628
8. H. Sneeve The treatment of burns and skin grafting J Am Med Assoc XLVII 1 1906 1 8
9. D.C. Ray, and D.W. McKeown Effect of induction agent on vasopressor and steroid use, and outcome in patients with septic shock Crit Care 11 3 2007 145 152
10. A. Blalock Experimental shock: VII. The importance of the local loss of fluid in the production of the low blood pressure after burns Arch Surg 22 4 1931 610 616
11. S. Hoka, K. Yamaura, T. Takenaka, and S. Takahashi Propofol-induced increase in vascular capacitance is due to inhibition of sympathetic vasoconstrictive activity Anesthesiology 89 1998 495 500
12. S. Yamashita, K. Kaneda, and T. Han Population pharmacokinetics of a propofol bolus administered in patients with major burns Burn 36 8 2010 1215 1221
13. D.G. Greenhalgh, J.R. Saffle, J.H. Holmes 4th, R.L. Gamelli, T.L. Palmieri, and J.W. Horton American Burn Association consensus conference to define sepsis and infection in burns J Burn Care Res 28 2007 776 790