Partitioning The Effects Of Spatial Isolation, Nest Habitat, And Individual Diet In Causing Assortative Mating Within A Population Of Threespine Stickleback

Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3582-3594

  Snowberg, L K ^a   Bolnick, D I ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Diet variation; Gasterosteus aculeatus; Habitat choice; Spatial cosegregation; Stable isotopes

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; DIET; FISH; GENOTYPE; MATING BEHAVIOR; MICROHABITAT; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION STRUCTURE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STABLE ISOTOPE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CANADA; DIET; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENETICS; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SMEGMAMORPHA;

ANIMALS; BRITISH COLUMBIA; DIET; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SMEGMAMORPHA; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

GASTEROSTEUS; GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS;

EID: 84868157606     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01701.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
2. Araújo, M. S., P. R. Guimarães, Jr., R. Svanbäck, A. Pinheiro, P. Guimarães, S. F. dos Reis, and D. I. Bolnick. 2008. Network analysis reveals contrasting effects of intraspecific competition on individual vs. population diets. Ecology 89:1981-1993.
3. Bakker, T. C., and M. Milinski. 1991. Sequential female choice and the previous male effect in sticklebacks. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29:205-210.
4. Bell, M. A. 1982. Differentiation of adjacent stream populations of threespine stickleback. Evolution 36:189-199.
5. Berlocher, S. H., and J. L. Feder. 2002. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47:773-815.
6. Bolnick, D. I., and O. L. Lau. 2008. Widespread disruptive selection in natural populations of sticklebacks in post-glacial lakes. Am. Nat. 172:1-11.
7. Bolnick, D. I., and J. E. Paull. 2009. Diet similarity declines with morphological distance between conspecific individuals. Evol. Ecol. Res. 11:1217-1233.
8. Bolnick, D. I., L. K. Snowberg, C. Patenia, W. E. Stutz, T. Ingram, and O. L. Lau. 2009. Pheontype-dependent native habitat preference facilitates divergence between parapatric lake and stream stickleback. Evolution 63:2004-2016.
9. Boughman, J. W. 2001. Divergent natural selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411:944-947.
10. Caillaud, M. C., and S. Via. 2000. Specialized feeding behavior influences both ecological specialization and assortative mating in sympatric host races of pea aphids. Am. Nat. 156:606-621.
11. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
12. Crespi, B. J. 1989. Causes of assortative mating in arthropods. Anim. Behav. 38:980-1000.
13. Crowley, P. H., S. E. Travers, M. C. Linton, S. L. Cohn, A. S. Sih, and C. R. Sargent. 1991. Mate density, predation risk and the seasonal sequence of mate choices: a dynamic game. Am. Nat. 137:567-596.
14. Edelaar, P., A. M. Siepielski, and J. Clobert. 2008. Matching habitat choice causes directed gene flow: a neglected dimension in evolution and ecology. Evolution 62:2462-2472.
15. Eizaguirre, C., T. L. Lenz, R. D. Sommerfeld, C. Harrod, M. Kalbe, and M. Milinksi. 2010. Parasite diversity, patterns of MHC II variation and olfactory based mate choice in diverging three-spine stickleback ecotypes. Evol. Ecol. 25:605-622.
16. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay. 1994. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edition. Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco.
17. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Skepticism toward Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35:124-138.
18. France, R. 1995. Differentiation between littoral and pelagic food webs in lakes using stable carbon isotopes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 40:1310-1313.
19. Gimelfarb, A. 1986. Is offspring-midparent regression affected by assortative mating of parents? Genet. Res. 47:71-75.
20. Gray, J. 2001. Ontogeny and dietary specialization in brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) from Loch Ness, Scotland, examined using stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 10:168-176.
21. Hobson, K. A. 1993. Trophic relationships among high Arctic seabirds: insights from tissue-dependent stable-isotope models. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 95:7-18.
22. Hobson, K. A., and R. G. Clark. 1992a. Assessing avian diets using stable isotopes II: factors influencing diet-tissue fractionation. Condor 94:189-197.
23. 13C in tissues. Condor 94:181-188.
24. Kitano, J., J. A. Ross, S. Mori, M. Kume, F. C. Jones, Y. F. Chan, D. M. Absher, J. Grimwood, J. Schmutz, R. M. Myers, D. M. Kingsley, and C. L. Peichel. 2009. A role for a neo-sex chromosome in stickleback speciation. Nature 461:1079-1083.
25. Kozak, G. M., and J. W. Boughman. 2009. Learned conspecific mate preference in a species pair of sticklebacks. Behav. Ecol. 20:1282-1288.
26. Kozak, G. M., M. L. Head, and J. W. Boughman. 2011. Sexual imprinting on ecologically divergent traits leads to sexual isolation in sticklebacks. P Roy Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 278:2604-2610.
27. Kraak, S. B. M., T. C. M. Bakker, and S. Hočevar. 2000. Stickleback males, especially large and red ones, are more likely to nest concealed in macrophytes. Behaviour 137:907-919.
28. Kume, M., J. Kitano, S. Mori, and T. Shibuya. 2010. Ecological divergence and habitat isolation between two migratory forms of Japanese threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). J. Evol. Biol. 23:1436-1446.
29. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
30. Matthews, B., K. B. Marchinko, D. I. Bolnick, and A. Mazumder. 2010. Specialization of trophic position and habitat use by stickleback in an adaptive radiation. Ecology 91:1025-1034.
31. McKinnon, J. S., S. Mori, B. K. Blackman, L. David, D. M. Kingley, L. Jamison, J. Chou, and D. Schluter. 2004. Evidence for ecology's role in speciation. Nature 429:294-298.
32. McPhail, J. D. 1994. Speciation and the evolution of reproductive isolation in the sticklebacks (Gasterosteus) in south-western British Columbia. Pp. 399-437 in M. A. Bell and S. A. Foster, eds. The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
33. Milinski, M., and T. C. Bakker. 1992. Costs influence sequential mate choice in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. P Roy Soc Lond. B Biol. 250:229-233.
34. Newsome, S., C. Martinez del Rio, D. L. Phillips, and S. Bearhop. 2007. A niche for isotope ecology. Front Ecol. Environ. 5:429-436.
35. Post, D. M. 2002. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83:703-718.
36. R Development Core Team (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/.
37. Raeymaekers, J. A. M, M. Boisjoly, L. Delaire, D. Berner, K. Räsänen, and A. P. Hendry. 2010. Testing for mating isolation between ecotypes: laboratory experiments with lake, stream andy hybrid stickleback. J. Evol. Biol. 23:2694-2708.
38. Rafferty, N. and J. W. Boughman. 2006. Olfactory mate recognition in a sympatric species pair of threespine sticklebacks. Behav. Ecol. 17:965-970.
39. Real, L. 1990. Search theory and mate choice. I. Models of single-sex discrimination. Am. Nat. 136:376-405.
40. Redden, D. and D. Allison. 2006. The effect of assortative mating upon genetic association studies: spurious associations and population substructure in the absence of admixture. Behav. Genet. 36:678-686.
41. Reusch, T. B. H., M. A. Häberli, P. B. Aeschlimann, and M. Milinski. 2001. Female sticklebacks count alleles in a strategy of sexual selection explaining MHC polymorphism. Nature 414:300-302.
42. Rice, W. R. 1987. Speciation via habitat specialization: the evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character. Evol. Ecol. 1:301-314.
43. Robinson, B. W. 2000. Trade offs in habitat-specific foraging efficiency and the nascent adaptive divergence of sticklebacks in lakes. Behaviour 137:865-888.
44. Schluter, D. 1995. Adaptive radiation in sticklebacks: trade-offs in feeding performance and growth. Ecology 76:82-90.
45. Schluter, D., and J. D. McPhail. 1992. Ecological character displacement and speciation in sticklebacks. Am. Nat. 140:85-108.
46. Snowberg, L. K. and Bolnick, D. I. 2008. Assortative mating by diet in a phenotypically unimodal but ecologically variable population of stickleback. Am. Nat. 172:733-739.
47. 13C analysis of diet. Oecologia 57:32-37.
48. Vamosi, S. M. and D. Schluter. 1999. Sexual selection against hybrids between sympatric stickleback species: evidence from a field experiment. Evolution 53:874-879.
49. Venables, W. N. and Ripley, B. D. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. 4th edition. Springer, New York.
50. Vines, T. H., and D. Schluter. 2006. Strong assortative mating between allopatric sticklebacks as a by-product of adaptation to different environments. P. Roy Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 273:911-916.
51. Ward, A. J. W., P. J. B. Hart, and J. Krause. 2004. The effects of habitat- and diet-based cues on association preferences in three-spined sticklebacks. Behav. Ecol. 15:925-929.
52. Wooten, R. J. 1976. The biology of the sticklebacks. Academic Press, London.
53. Wright S. 1921. Systems of mating. III. Assortative mating based on somatic resemblance. Genetics 6:144-161.