Intervention costs and cost-effectiveness of a successful telephonic intervention to promote diabetes control

Diabetes Care

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 2156-2160

  Schechter, Clyde B ^a   Cohen, Hillel W ^a   Shmukler, Celia ^b   Walker, Elizabeth A ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b 1199SEIU Benefit and Pension Funds ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIABETES CONTROL; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; PATIENT EDUCATION; SELF CARE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TELECONSULTATION;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS; TELEPHONE;

EID: 84868146591     PISSN: 01495992     EISSN: 19355548     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2337/dc12-0048     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2011. Diabetes Care 2011;34(Suppl. 1):S11-S61
2. Hoerger TJ, Segel JE, Gregg EW, Saaddine JB. Is glycemic control improving in U.S. adults? Diabetes Care 2008;31:81-86
3. Funnell MM, Brown TL, Childs BP, et al. National standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care 2010;33(Suppl. 1):S89-S96
4. Peyrot M, Rubin RR. Access to diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Educ 2008;34:90-97
5. Heisler M, Vijan S, Makki F, Piette JD. Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2010;153:507-515
6. Brownson CA, Heisler M. The role of peer support in diabetes care and self-management. Patient 2009;2:5-17
7. Glasgow RE, Kurz D, King D, et al. Twelve-month outcomes of an internet-based diabetes self-management support program. Patient Educ Couns 2011;87:81-92
8. Piette JD, Weinberger M, McPhee SJ. The effect of automated calls with telephone nurse follow-up on patient-centered outcomes of diabetes care: a randomized, controlled trial. Med Care 2000;38:218-230
9. Wennberg DE, Marr A, Lang L, O'Malley S, Bennett G. A randomized trial of a telephone care-management strategy. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1245-1255
10. Walker EA, Schechter CB, Caban A, Basch CE. Telephone intervention to promote diabetic retinopathy screening among the urban poor. Am J Prev Med 2008;34:185-191 (Pubitemid 351220951)
11. Schechter CB, Basch CE, Caban A, Walker EA. Cost effectiveness of a telephone intervention to promote dilated fundus examination in adults with diabetes mellitus. Clin Ophthalmol 2008;2:763-768
12. Cohen HW, Shmukler C, Ullman R, Rivera CM, Walker EA. Measurements of medication adherence in diabetic patients with poorly controlled HbA(1c). Diabet Med 2010;27:210-216
13. Walker EA, Shmukler C, Ullman R, Blanco E, Cohen HW. Results of a successful telephonic intervention to improve diabetes control in urban adults: a randomized trial. Diabetes Care 2011;34:2-7
14. United States Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics. National Compensation Survey [Internet]. Available from http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/dsrv? nw. Accessed 14 February 2011.
15. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3rd ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006
16. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 1994
17. Freeman RB, Oostendorp RH. Occupational Wages of the World Database [Internet]. Available from http://www.nber.org/oww/. Accessed 3 March 2012.
18. Frosch DL, Uy V, Ochoa S, Mangione CM. Evaluation of a behavior support intervention for patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:2011-2017
19. Patel A, Maissi E, Chang H-C, et al. Motivational enhancement therapy with and without cognitive behaviour therapy for type 1 diabetes: economic evaluation from a randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med 2011;28:470-479
20. Ritzwoller DP, Sukhanova AS, Glasgow RE, et al. Intervention costs and cost effectiveness for a multiple risk factor diabetes self-management trial for Latinas: economic analysis of ¡Viva Bien! Tranl Behav Med 2011;3:427-435