Early phase detection of bile leak after hepatobiliary surgery: Value of Gd-EOB-DTPAenhanced MR cholangiography

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 795-802

  Castellanos, Alvaro Alegre ^a   Granados, Juan Felix Molina ^b   Fernandez, Jose Escribano ^a   Muñoz, Inmaculada Gallardo ^a   De Asis Triviño Tarradas, Francisco ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO REINA SOFÍA   (Spain)

^b Hospital Universitario del Sureste de Madrid   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bile ducts; Bile leak; Cholangiography; DTPA; EOB; Gd; Postsurgical complications

Indexed keywords

GADOXETIC ACID;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS DEHISCENCE; ANASTOMOSIS STENOSIS; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT BYPASS; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; BILE LEAKAGE; BILIARY TRACT SURGERY; BILOMA; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LIVER GRAFT; LIVER INJURY; LIVER RESECTION; LIVER SURGERY; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARTIAL HEPATECTOMY; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSHEPATIC CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; PERITONEAL FLUID; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BILE DUCT DISEASES; BILE DUCTS; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; LIVER DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;

EID: 84868133371     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: 14320509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-011-9834-6     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. McLindon JP, England RE, Martin DF (1998) Causes, clinical features and non-operative management of bile leaks. Eur Radiol 8:1602-1607
2. Mahatharadol V (2004) Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: An audit of 1522 cases. Hepatogastroenterology 51:12-14
3. Marin D, Bova V, Agnello F, et al. (2010) Gadoxetate disodiumenhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography for the noninvasive detection of an active bile duct leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34:213-216
4. McArthur C, Unnam S, Felsenstein I (2010) Isolated blunt traumatic gallbladder perforation demonstrated on MDCT and postcholecystectomy bile leak revealed on Gd-EOB-DTPA (Primovist) enhanced MRCP. Eur J Radiol 73:e65-e67
5. Mittal BR, Sunil HV, Bhattacharya A, Singh B (2008) Hepatobiliary scintigraphy in management of bile leaks in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. ANZ J Surg 78:597-600
6. Freeman ML (2003) Understanding risk factors and avoiding complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 5:145-153
7. Hoeffel C, Azizi L, Lewin M, et al. (2006) Normal and pathologic features of the postoperative biliary tract at 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and MR imaging. Radiographics 26:1603-1620
8. Lee NK, Kim S, Lee JW, et al. (2009) Biliary MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and its clinical applications. Radiographics 29:1707-1724
9. Vitellas KM, El-Dieb A, Vaswani KK, et al. (2002) Using contrastenhanced MR cholangiography with IV mangafodipir trisodium (Teslascan) to evaluate bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy: A prospective study of 11 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:409-416
10. Vitellas KM, El-Dieb A, Vaswani K, et al. (2001) Detection of bile duct leaks using MR cholangiography with mangafodipir trisodium (Teslascan). J Comput Assist Tomogr 25:102-105
11. Reimer P, Schneider G, Schima W (2004) Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: Properties, clinical development and applications. Eur Radiol 14:559-578
12. Seale MK, Catalano OA, Saini S, Hahn PF, Sahani DV (2009) Hepatobiliary-specific MR contrast agents: Role in imaging the liver and biliary tree. Radiographics 29:1725-1748
13. Tanimoto A, Lee JM, Murakami T, et al. (2009) Consensus report of the 2nd International Forum for Liver MRI. Eur Radiol 19:975-989
14. Gupta RT, Brady CM, Lotz J, Boll DT, Merkle EM (2010) Dynamic MR imaging of the biliary system using hepatocytespecific contrast agents. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:405-413
15. Takao H, Akai H, Tajima T, et al. (2011) MR imaging of the biliary tract with Gd-EOB-DTPA: Effect of liver function on signal intensity. Eur J Radiol 77:325-329
16. Tschirch FT, Struwe A, Petrowsky H, et al. (2008) Contrastenhanced MR cholangiography with Gd-EOB-DTPA in patients with liver cirrhosis: Visualization of the biliary ducts in comparison with patients with normal liver parenchyma. Eur Radiol 18:1577-1586
17. O'Connor OJ, O'Neil S, Mahler MM (2011) Imaging of biliary tract disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W551-W558
18. Kim SH, Kim SH, Lee J, et al. (2009) Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus triple-phase MDCT for the preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1675-1681
19. Huppertz A, Haraida S, Kraus A, et al. (2005) Enhancement of focal liver lesions at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging: Correlation with histopathologic findings and spiral CT-initial observations. Radiology 234:468-478
20. Zech CJ, Grazioli L, Jonas E, et al. (2009) Health-economic evaluation of three imaging strategies in patients with suspected colorectal liver metastases: Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI vs. extracellular contrast media-enhanced MRI and 3-phase MDCT in Germany, Italy and Sweden. Eur Radiol 19:753-763