Specification of photonic circuits using quantum hardware description language

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Volumn 370, Issue 1979, 2012, Pages 5270-5290

  Tezak, Nikolas ^a   Niederberger, Armand ^a,b   Pavlichin, Dmitri S ^a   Sarma, Gopal ^a   Mabuchi, Hideo ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Photonics; Quantum control; Quantum feedback; Quantum information; Quantum optics

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER HARDWARE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; HARDWARE; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; QUANTUM OPTICS;

CIRCUIT DESCRIPTION; COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH; HIERARCHICAL MODEL; INPUT-OUTPUT; MULTICOMPONENTS; OPTICAL COMPONENTS; PHOTONIC CIRCUITS; QUANTUM CONTROL; QUANTUM FEEDBACK; QUANTUM INFORMATION; STRUCTURAL MODES; VHSIC HARDWARE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES;

PHOTONICS;

EID: 84868122486     PISSN: 1364503X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0526     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Gough, J. E. & James, M. R. 2008 Quantum feedback networks: Hamiltonian formulation. Commun. Math. Phys. 287, 1109-1132. (doi:10.1007/s00220-008-0698-8)
2. Gough, J. E. & James, M. R. 2009 The series product and its application to quantum feedforward and feedback networks. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 54, 2530-2544. (doi:10.1109/TAC.2009.2031205)
3. Carmichael, H. J. 1993 Quantum trajectory theory for cascaded open systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2273-2276. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2273)
4. Gardiner, C. W. 1993 Driving a quantum system with the output field from another driven quantum system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2269-2272. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2269)
5. Kerckhoff, J., and Nurdin., H. I., Pavlichin, D. S. & Mabuchi, H. 2010 Designing quantum memories with embedded control: photonic circuits for autonomous quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 040502. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.040502)
6. Kerckhoff, J., and Pavlichin., D. S., Chalabi, H. & Mabuchi, H. 2011 Design of nanophotonic circuits for autonomous subsystem quantum error correction. New J. Phys. 13, 055022. (doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/5/055022)
7. Mabuchi, H. 2011 Coherent-feedback control strategy to suppress spontaneous switching in ultralow power optical bistability. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 193109. (doi:10.1063/1.3589994)
8. Mabuchi, H. 2011 Nonlinear interferometry approach to photonic sequential logic. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 153103. (doi:10.1063/1.3650250)
9. Jacobs, K., and Nurdin., H. I., Strauch, F. & James, M. R. 2010 Frequency conversion: side-band cooling, state-swapping, and coherent control of mechanical resonators. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2653)
10. Gough, J. E., James, M. R. & Nurdin, H. I. 2010 Squeezing components in linear quantum feedback networks. Phys. Rev. A 81, 023804. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.81.023804)
11. Gardiner, C. W. & Zoller, P. 2000 Quantum noise: a handbook of Markovian and non-Markovian quantum stochastic methods with applications to quantum optics, 2nd edn. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
12. Bouten, L., Van Handel, R. & James, M. 2007 An introduction to quantum filtering. SIAM J. Control Optim. 46, 2199-2241. (doi:10.1137/060651239)
13. Wiseman, H. M. & Milburn, G. J. 2010 Quantum measurement and control, 1st edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Pedroni, V. A. 2004 Circuit design and simulation with VHDL. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. The gEDA project. 1998 gEDA: gpl electronic design automation suite. See http://www.gpleda.org.
16. The Modelica Association. 1996 Modelica. See http://modelica.org.
17. Beazley, D. 2001 Ply: python lex-yacc. See http://www.dabeaz.com/ply.
18. Van Rossum, G. 1990 The Python language. See http://www.python.org/.
19. SymPy Development Team. 2007 SymPy: Python library for symbolic mathematics. See http://www.sympy.org.
20. Wolfram Research, Inc. 1988 Mathematica. See http://www.wolfram.com/ mathematica.
21. Ascher, D., and Dubois., P. F., Hinsen, K., Hugunin, J., Jones, E., Oliphant, T. & Peterson, P. 1996 SciPy and Numpy: open source scientific tools for Python. See http://www.scipy.org/.
22. Intel Corporation. 2003 MKL: Math Kernel Library. See http://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-mkl.
23. Tan, S. M. 1999 A computational toolbox for quantum and atomic optics. J. Opt. B 1, 424-432. (doi:10.1088/1464-4266/1/4/312)
24. The MathWorks, Inc. 1984 Matlab: the language of technical computing. See http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.
25. Johansson, J. R., Nation, P. D. & Nori, F. 2011 QuTIP: an open-source Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems. Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 1760-1772. (doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.02.021)
26. Haroche, S. & Raimond, J.-M. 2006 Exploring the quantum: atoms, cavities and photons. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27. Bouten, L., van Handel, R. & Silberfarb, A. 2008 Approximation and limit theorems for quantum stochastic models with unbounded coefficients. J. Funct. Anal. 254, 3123-3147. (doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2008.02.013)
28. Gough, J. E., Nurdin, H. I. & Wildfeuer, S. 2010 Commutativity of the adiabatic elimination limit of fast oscillatory components and the instantaneous feedback limit in quantum feedback networks. J. Math. Phys. 51, 123518. (doi:10.1063/1.3520513)
29. Kushner, H. J. & Dupuis, P. 1992 Numerical methods for stochastic control problems in continuous time. New York, NY: Springer.
30. Nielsen, A. E. B., Hopkins, A. S. & Mabuchi, H. 2009 Quantum filter reduction for measurement-feedback control via unsupervised manifold learning. New J. Phys. 11, 105043. (doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/105043)
31. Niederberger, A., Gauger, N. R. & Mabuchi, H. In preparation. Efficient quantum design optimization and stability analysis.