Affordable housing networks: A case study in the Phoenix metropolitan region

Housing Policy Debate

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 219-240

  Lucio, Joanna ^a   de la Cruz, Edgar Ramirez ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y DOCENCIA ECONÓMICAS   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Affordable housing; Low income housing; Network governance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868102791     PISSN: 10511482     EISSN: 2152050X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2011.648206     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Agranoff, R. 1986. Intergovernmental management: Human services problem-solving in six metropolitan areas. Albany: State University of New York Press.
2. Agranoff, R. 1991. Human services integration: Past and present challenges in public administration. Public Administration Review 51, no. 6: 533-42.
3. Agranoff, R. 2003. Leveraging networks: A guide for public managers working across. Arlington, VA: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
4. Agranoff, R., and M. McGuire. 2001. Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration, Research & Theory 11, no. 3: 295-326.
5. Alpert, L., J.F. Gainsborough, and A. Wallis. 2006. Building the capacity to act regionally: Formation of the regional transportation authority in South Florida. Urban Affairs Review 42, no. 2: 143-68.
6. Arizona Incentives for Affordable Housing Task Force. 2006. http://azcms.housingaz.com/ uploads/REPORTS/Arizona_Incentives_Affordable_Housing_Task_Force.pdf (accessed October 15, 2007).
7. Aurand, A. 2007. The impact of regional government structure on the concentration and supply of affordable housing. Housing Policy Debate 18, no. 2: 393-429.
8. Basolo, V. 2000. City spending on economic development versus affordable housing: Does inter-city competition or local politics drive decisions? Journal of Urban Affairs 22, no. 3: 317-2.
9. Basolo, V., and D. Hastings. 2003. Obstacles to regional housing solutions: A comparison of four metropolitan areas. Journal of Urban Affairs 25, no. 4: 449-72.
10. Berry, F.S., R.S. Brower, S.O. Choi, W.X. Goa, H. Jang, M. Kwon, and J. Word. 2004. Three traditions of network research: What the public management research agenda can learn from other research communities. Public Administration Review 64, no. 5: 539-2.
11. Biernacki, P., and D. Waldorf. 1981. Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods Research 10, no. 2: 141-63.
12. Bogason, P., and J.A. Musso. 2006. The democratic prospects of network governance. The American Review of Public Administration 36, no. 1: 3-18.
13. Bonacich, P. 1972. Technique for analyzing overlapping memberships. Sociological Methodology 4: 176-85.
14. Boyte, H.C. 2005. Reframing democracy: Governance, civic agency, and politics. Public Administration Review 65, no. 5: 536-46.
15. Choi, S.O., and R.S. Brower. 2006. When practice matters more than government plans: A network analysis of local emergency management. Administration & Society 37, no. 6: 651-78.
16. Coleman, J. 1958. Relational analysis: The study of social organization with survey methods. Human Organization 16, no. 4: 28-36.
17. Coleman, J.S., E. Katz, and H. Menzel. 1957. The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry 20: 253-70.
18. Dahl, R.A. 1961. Who governs? Democracy and power in the American city. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19. Davies, J.S. 2002. The governance of urban regeneration: A critique of the 'governing without government' thesis. Public Administration 80, no. 2: 301-22.
20. Downs, A. 1994. New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
21. Dreier, P., J. Mollenkopf, and T. Swanstrom. 2005. Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty-first century. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
22. Freeman, L.C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1, no. 3: 215-39.
23. Galster, George C. and Sean P. Killen. 1995. The geography of metropolitan opportunity: A reconnaissance and conceptual framework. Housing Policy Debate 6, no. 1: 7-43.
24. Glickman, N.J. and L.J. Servon. 2003. By the numbers: Measuring community development corporation capacity. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22: 240-56.
25. Goodman, L.A. 1961. Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32: 148-70.
26. Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360-80.
27. Gunderson, R.J. 2007. Housing affordability and workforce housing initiatives. Economic Development Journal 6, no. 2: 39-46.
28. Hanneman, Robert A. and Mark, Riddle. 2005. Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California. http://faculty.ucr.edu/*hanneman/ (accessed December 27, 2011).
29. Hanneman, R.A. and M. Riddle, 2005. Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California.
30. Heclo, H. 1978. Issue networks and the executive establishment. In The political system, ed. A. King, 87-124. Washington DC: The American Institute for Public Policy Research.
31. Hudson, J., S. Lowe, N. Oscroft, and C. Snell, 2007. Activating policy networks: A case study of local environment policy-making in the United Kingdom. Policy Studies Journal 28, no. 1: 55-70.
32. Immergluck, D. 2009. The Foreclosure crisis, foreclosed properties, and federal policy: Some implications for housing and community development planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 75, no. 4: 406-23.
33. Immergluck, D., and G. Smith. 2006. The external costs of foreclosure: The impact of singlefamily mortgage foreclosures on property values. Housing Policy Debate 17, no. 1: 57-79.
34. Kain, J. 1992. The spatial mismatch hypothesis: Three decades later. Housing Policy Debate 3, no. 2: 371-92.
35. Keys, E., E.A. Wentz, and C.L. Redman. 2007. The spatial structure of land use from 1970-2000 in the Phoenix, Arizona, metropolitan area. The Professional Geographer 59: 131-47.
36. Lang, R., and J. LeFurgy. 2007a. Boomburb "Buildout": The future of development in large, fast-growing suburbs. Urban Affairs Review 42, no. 4, 533-52.
37. Lang, R., and J. LeFurgy. 2007b. Boomburbs: The rise of America's accidental cities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
38. Logan, John, and Harvey Molotch. 1987. Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
39. Maricopa County Regional Workforce Housing Plan. (2006). http://rwhousingtaskforce.org/ findings.htm. (accessed March 15, 2007).
40. Mattern, H. 2004. Number 1-Valley Housing Industry Rockets, The Arizona Republic, N2, December 31.
41. Meier, K.J., and L.J. O'Toole. 2001. Managerial strategies and behavior in networks: A model with evidence from U.S. public education. Journal of Public Administration, Research, and Theory 11, no. 3: 271-94.
42. Meier, K.J., and L.J. O'Toole Jr. 2003. Public management and educational performance: The impact of managerial networking. Public Administration Review 63, no. 6: 689-99.
43. Mintrom, M. 1997. Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science 41: 738-70.
44. Mintrom, M. 2000. Policy entrepreneurs and school choice. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
45. Mintrom, M., and S. Vergari. 1998. Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms. The Journal of Politics 60, no. 1: 126-48.
46. Molotch, H.L. 1976. The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. The American Journal of Sociology 82, no. 2: 309-31.
47. Mukhija, V., L. Regus, S. Slovin, and A. Das. 2010. Can inclusionary zoning be effective and efficient housing policy? Evidence from Los Angeles and Orange counties. Journal of Urban Affairs 32, no. 2: 229-52.
48. Oakley, D. 2008. Locational patterns of low income housing tax credit developments: Sociospatial analysis of four metropolitan areas. Urban Affairs Review 43: 599.
49. O'Toole, L. 1997. Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review 57, no. 1, 45-52.
50. Provan, K., and B. Milward. 1995. A preliminary theory of interorganizational effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 40, no. 1: 1-33.
51. Provan, K.G., and H.B. Milward. 1991. Institutional-level norms and organizational involvement in a service-implementation network. Journal of Public Administration, Research, and Theory 1, no. 4: 391-a-418-391-a-418.
52. Provan, K.G., and H.B. Milward. 2001. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review 61, no. 4: 414-23.
53. Reagor, C. 2006. First-time buyers catch a break-discounts and aid programs counter higher prices and open doors to ownership. The Arizona Republic, August: A1.
54. Rhodes, R.A.W. 2000. Governance and public administration. In Debating governance: Authority, steering and democracy, ed. J. Pierre, 54-90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Rohe, W.M., R.G. Querecias, and D.K. Levy, 2001. The performance of non-profit housing developments in the United States. Housing Studies 16, no. 5: 595-618.
56. Rubin, H.J. 2000. Renewing hope within neighborhoods of despair: The community-based development model. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
57. Schneider, M., J. Scholz, M. Lubell, D. Mindruta, and M. Edwardsen. 2003. Building consensual institutions: Networks and the national estuary program. American Journal of Political Science 47, no. 1: 142-57.
58. Schneider, M., P. Teske, and M. Mintrom. 1995. Public entrepreneurs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
59. Scott, J. 2000. Social network analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
60. Seidman, I. 2006. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
61. Shlay, A.B. 2006. Low-income homeownership: American Dream or Delusion? Urban Studies 43, no. 3: 511-31.
62. Silverman, R.M. 2008. The influence of nonprofit networks on local affordable housing funding: Findings from a national survey of local public administrators. Urban Affairs Review 44, no. 1: 126-41.
63. Sørensen, E. 2006. Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. The American Review of Public Administration 36. no. 1: 98-114.
64. Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2005. The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scandinavian Political Studies 28, no. 3: 195-218.
65. Stone, C. 1989. Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
66. Swanstrom, T. 1999. The nonprofitization of United States housing policy: Dilemmas of community development. Community Development Journal 34, no. 1: 28-37.
67. Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
68. Wilson, William J. 1999. When work disappears: New implications for race and urban poverty in the global economy. Ethnic & Racial Studies 22, no. 3: 479-500.
69. Yin, R. 1994. Case study research: Design and methods. Vol. 5. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.