Mesozonation of the Italian territory for the definition of real spectrum-compatible accelerograms

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1357-1375

  Rota, M ^a   Zuccolo, E ^b   Taverna, L ^c   Corigliano, M ^c   Lai, C G ^a,b   Penna, A ^a,b  

^a EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR TRAINING AND RESEARCH IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Mesozonation; Real accelerograms; Seismic input; Spectrum compatibility; Time history analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROGRAMS; MESOZONATION; SEISMIC INPUT; SPECTRUM-COMPATIBILITY; TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS;

GRAPHIC METHODS; SEISMOLOGY; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

BUILDING CODES;

ACCELERATION; ACCELEROMETER; BUILDING CODE; ELASTIC PROPERTY; OUTCROP; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMIC ZONE; TERRITORIAL PLANNING; TOPOGRAPHIC EFFECT; WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 84868090284     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-012-9369-4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Al Atik L, Abrahamson NA (2010) An improved method for nonstationary spectral matching. Earthq Spectra 26(3): 601-617.
2. Bommer JJ, Acevedo AB (2004) The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis. J Earthq Eng 8(SI1): 43-91.
3. Boore DM (2005) SMSIM-fortran programs for simulating ground motions from earthquakes: version 2. 3-a revision of OFR 96-80-A. U. S. Geological Survey open-file report.
4. Bradley BA (2010) A generalized conditional intensity measure approach and holistic ground-motion selection. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39(12): 1321-1342.
5. Circ NTC (2009) Circolare, n. 617, 2 febbraio 2009, del Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei trasporti approvata dal Consiglio Superiore dei Lavori Pubblici "Istruzioni per l'applicazione delle nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni di cui al D. M. 14 gennaio 2008" (in Italian).
6. Corigliano M, Lai CG, Rota M, Strobbia C (2012) ASCONA: Automated Selection of Compatibile Natural Accelerograms. Earthq Spectra (in press).
7. Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seism Soc Am 58: 1583-1606.
8. EN 1998-1 (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.
9. GdL MPS (2004) Redazione della mappa di pericolosità sismica prevista dall'Ordinanza PCM 3274 del 20 marzo 2003, Rapporto conclusivo per il dipartimento di Protezione Civile, INGV, Milano-Roma, 65 pp. +5 appendici. Website: http://zonesismiche. mi. ingv. it/elaborazioniinItalian.
10. Halldorsson B, Papageorgiou AS (2004) Region specific ground motion simulations using the specific barrier model. Draft user manual for SGMSv5.
11. Hancock J, Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson NA, Bommer JJ, Markatis A, McCoy E, Mendis R (2006) An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets. J Earthq Eng 10(SI1): 67-89.
12. Iervolino I, Maddaloni G, Cosenza E (2008) Eurocode 8 compliant real record sets for seismic analysis of structures. J Earthq Eng 12: 54-90.
13. Iervolino I, Galasso C, Cosenza E (2010) REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis. Bull Earthq Eng 8: 339-362. doi: 10. 1007/s10518-009-9146-1.
14. Iervolino I, Galasso C, Paolucci R, Pacor F (2011) Engineering ground motion record selection in the ITalian ACcelerometric Archive. Bull Earthq Eng 9: 1761-1778. doi: 10. 1007/s10518-011-9300-4.
15. 2012 International Building Code (2011) International Code Council, 690 pp.
16. Kottke A, Rathje EM (2008) A semi-automated procedure for selecting and scaling recorded earthquake motions for dynamic analysis. Earthq Spectra 24(4): 911-932.
17. Lai CG, Foti S, Rota M (2009) Input Sismico e Stabilità Geotecnica dei Siti di Costruzione. IUSS Press, Pavia.
18. Mai PM, Beroza GC (2003) Hybrid method for calculating near-source, broadband seismograms: application to strong motion prediction. Phys Earth Planet Inter 137: 183-199.
19. McGuire RK (1995) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: closing the loop. Bull Seism Soc Am 85(5): 1275-1284.
20. Meletti C, Valensise G (2004) Zonazione Sismogenetica ZS9-App. 2 al Rapporto Conclusivo, Appendice 2 al documento "Redazione della Mappa di Pericolosità Sismica prevista dall'Ordinanza PCM del 20 marzo 2003, n. 3274, All. 1-Rappsorto Conclusivo, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia. http://zonesismiche. mi. ingv. it/-inItalian.
21. Motazedian D, Atkinson GM (2005) Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency. Bull Seism Soc Am 95: 995-1010.
22. Mukherjee S, Gupta VK (2002) Wavelet-based characterisation of design ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(5): 1173-1190.
23. NEHRP (2004) Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures (FEMA 450) part 1: provisions. Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D. C.
24. NTC (2008) Norme tecniche per le costruzioni, Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Decreto Ministeriale del 14 gennaio 2008, Supplemento ordinario alla G. U. n. 29 del 4 febbraio 2008.
25. Shome N, Cornell CA, Bazzurro P, Carballo JE (1998) Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses. Earthq Spectra 14(3): 469-500.
26. Zini A, Rinaldis D, Pugliese A (2011) Raggruppamento della pericolosità sismica del territorio nazionale attraverso parametri statistici. In: Proceedings of 14th Italian conference on earthquake engineering, Bari (in Italian).
27. Zuccolo E, Corigliano M, Taverna L, Lai CG (2011) Meso-zonazione di un territorio per la definizione di accelerogrammi reali spettro-compatibili. In: Proceedings of 14th Italian conference on earthquake engineering, Bari (in Italian).