Are external face features useful for automatic face classification?

IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

Volumn 2005-September, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Lapedriza, Àgata ^a   Masip, David ^a   Vitrià, Jordi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION; FACTORIZATION; MATRIX ALGEBRA;

ENCODED INFORMATION; EXTERNAL FEATURES; EXTERNAL INFORMATIONS; FACE CLASSIFICATION; FACE FEATURES; GENDER RECOGNITION; HIGH DIMENSIONAL FEATURE; NON-NEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION ALGORITHMS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84868025013     PISSN: 21607508     EISSN: 21607516     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2005.569     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Izzat N. Jarudi and P. Sinha, “Relative contributions of internal and external features to face recognition,” Massachusetts Institute of technology, Tech. Rep., 2003.
2. A.M. Burton, V. Bruce, N. Dench, “What's the difference between men and women? evidence from facial measurement,” Perception, vol. 22, p. 153:76, 1993.
3. E. Borenstein and S. Ullman, “Class-specific, top-down segmentation,” in ECCV'02: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Computer Vision-Part II. Springer-Verlag, 2002, pp. 109-124.
4. D. D. Lee and H. S. Seung, “Learning the parts of objects with nonnegative matrix factorization,” Nature, vol. 401, pp. 788-791, July 1999.
5. Daniel D. Lee and H. Sebastian Seung, “Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization,” in NIPS, 2000, pp. 556-562.
6. P. O. Hoyer, “Non-negative matrix factorization with sparseness constraints,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 5, pp. 1457-1469, 2004.
7. R. Brunelli and T. Poggio, “Hyperbf networks for gender classification,” DARPA Image Understanding workshop, p. 311:314, 1992.
8. H. Abdi, D. Valentin, B. Edelman and A. O'Toole, “More about the difference between men and women: evidence from linear neural networks and the principal component approach,” Perception, vol. 24, p. 539:562, 1995.
9. G. Cottrell, “Empath: Face, emotion, and gender recognition using holons,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 3, p. 564:571, 1991.
10. Moghaddam B. and Yang, “Learning gender with support faces,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 707-711, jan 2002.
11. J. L. Kamal Nigam and A. McCallum, “Using maximum entropy for text classification,” in IJCAI-99 Workshop on Machine Learning for Information Filtering, 1999, pp. 61-67.
12. K. Chang, K. Bowyer, S. Sarkar, and B. Victor, “Comparison and combination of ear and face images in appearance-based biometrics,” IEEE Transactions PAMI, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1160-1165, Sept. 2003.
13. M. Turk and A. Pentland, “Eigenfaces for recognition,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 71-86, 1991.
14. R. Fisher, “The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems,” Ann. Eugenics, vol. 7, pp. 179-188, 1936.
15. R. Rosenfeld, “Adaptive statistical language modeling: A maximum entropy approach,” Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, 1994.