Factors influencing the adoption of home telecare by elderly or chronically ill people: A national survey

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Volumn 21, Issue 21-22, 2012, Pages 3183-3193

  Peeters, José M ^a   De Veer, Anke J E ^a   Van der Hoek, Lucas ^a   Francke, Anneke L ^a,b  

^a NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adoption; Chronic patients; Home telecare; Innovation; Older people; Technology

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TELEMEDICINE; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

AGED; CHRONIC DISEASE; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENTS; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84867999732     PISSN: 09621067     EISSN: 13652702     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04173.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barlow J, Bayer S & Curry R (2006) Implementing complex innovations in fluid multi-stakeholder environments: experiences of 'telecare'. Technovation 26, 396-406.
2. Barlow J, Singh D, Bayer S & Curry R (2007) A systematic review of the benefits of home telecare for frail elderly people and those with long-term conditions. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 13, 172-179.
3. Bos JT, de Jongh DM & Francke AL (2005) Monitor invoering videonetwerken in de thuiszorg. Verslag legging van de eerste peiling (Monitor Implementation Video Networks in the Home Care. Report of the First Survey). NIVEL, Utrecht [in Dutch].
4. Botsis T & Hartvigsen G (2008) Current status and future perspectives in telecare for elderly people suffering from chronic diseases. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 14, 195-203.
5. Botsis T, Demiris G, Pendersen S & Hartvigsen G (2008) Home telecare technologies for the elderly. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 14, 333-337.
6. Bowles HK & Baugh AC (2007) Applying research evidence to optimize telehomecare. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 22, 5-15.
7. Broens TH, Huis in 't Veld RM, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Hermens HJ, van Halteren AT & Nieuwenhuis LJ (2007) Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: a literature study. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 13, 303-309.
8. Buchan J (2001) Nurse migration and international recruitment. Nursing Inquiry 8, 203-204.
9. De Veer AJ & Francke AL (2010) Attitudes of nursing staff towards electronic patient records: a questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies 47, 846-854.
10. De Veer AJ, Fleuren MA, Bekkema N & Francke AL (2011) Successful implementation of new technologies in nursing care: a questionnaire survey of nurse-users. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 11, 67.
11. DeJonge KE, Taler G & Boling PA (2009) Independence at home: community-based care for older adults with severe chronic illness. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 25, 155-169.
12. Department of Health & Older People and Disability Division (2005) Building Telecare in England. Department of Health, London.
13. Fleuren MAH, Wiefferink CH & Paulussen TGW (2004) Determinants of innovation within health care organizations: literature review and Delphi-study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 16, 107-123.
14. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P & Kyriakidou O (2004) Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly 82, 581-629.
15. Hebert MA & Korabek B (2004) Stakeholder readiness for telehomecare: implications for implementation. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 10, 85-92.
16. Horton K (2008) The use of telecare for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: implications for management. Journal of Nursing Management 16, 173-180.
17. Jenkins RL & McSweeney M (2001) Assessing elderly patients with congestive heart failure via in-home interactive telecommunication. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 27, 21-27.
18. Johnston B (2000) Exploring the new frontier: home care gets wired. Caring 19, 6-10.
19. Levy S, Jack N, Bradley D, Morison M & Swanston M (2003) Perspectives on telecare: the client view. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 9, 156-160.
20. Lorentz MM (2008) Telenursing and home healthcare: the many facets of technology. Home Healthcare Nurse 26, 237-243.
21. Merrell RC & Doarn CR (2006) Telehomecare: where are we? Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 12, 79-80.
22. Peeters JM, de Veer AJE & Francke AL (2009) Monitor Zorg op Afstand in de thuiszorg. Verslaglegging van de peiling eind 2008/begin 2009 (Monitor Care at a Distance. Report of the Survey 2008/2009). NIVEL, Utrecht [in Dutch].
23. Rogers EM (1962) Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York, NY.
24. Rogers EM (1995a) Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn. Free Press, New York, NY.
25. Rogers EM (1995b) Lessons for guidelines from the diffusion of innovation. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement 21, 324-328.
26. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York, NY.
27. Rogers EM & Shoemaker FF (1971) Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach. Free Press, New York, NY.
28. Rumberger J & Dansky K (2006) Is there a business case for telehealth in home health agencies? Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 12, 122-127.
29. Scott DS, Plotnikoff RC, Karunamuni N, Bize R & Rogers W (2008) Factors influencing the adoption of an innovation: an examination of the uptake of the Canadian Heart Health Kit (HHK). Biomed Central Ltd. Implementation Science 3, 41.
30. Tran K, Polisena J, Coyle D, Coyle K, Kluge E-HW, Cimon K, McGill S, Noorani H, Palmer K & Scott R (2008) Home Telehealth for Chronic Disease Management. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Ottawa.
31. Venkatesh V & Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46, 186-204.