Comparison of plantar loads during treadmill and overground running

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 554-560

  Hong, Youlian ^a,b   Wang, Lin ^c,d   Li, Jing Xian ^c,e   Zhou, Ji He ^a  

^a CHENGDU SPORT UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b XTEP CHINA CO LTD   (China)

^c SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY OF SPORT   (China)

^d CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Athletic injuries; Biomechanics; Exercise test; Plantar load; Running; Running surfaces

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOREFOOT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEG INJURY; MALE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; NORMAL HUMAN; PLANTARIS MUSCLE; REHABILITATION CARE; RUNNING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOE; TREADMILL; TREADMILL EXERCISE;

ATHLETES; BIOMECHANICS; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; EXERCISE TEST; FOOT; HUMANS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MALE; POACEAE; RUNNING; SHOES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867989617     PISSN: 14402440     EISSN: 18781861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Lavcanska V., Taylor N.F., Schache A.G. Familiarization to treadmill running in young unimpaired adults. Human Movement Science 2005, 24(4):544-557.
2. Wank V., Frick U., Schmidtbleicher D. Kinematics and electromyography of lower limb muscles in overground and treadmill running. International Journal of Sports Medicine 1998, 19(7):455-461.
3. Riley P.O., Dicharry J., Franz J., et al. A kinematics and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill running. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2008, 40(6):1093-1100.
4. Schache A.G., Blanch P.D., Rath D.A., et al. A comparison of overground and treadmill running for measuring the three-dimensional kinematics of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 2001, 16(8):667-680.
5. Kram R., Griffin T.M., Donelan J.M., et al. Force treadmill for measuring vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces. Journal of Applied Physiology 1998, 85(2):764-769.
6. Queen R.M., Haynes B.B., Hardaker W.M., et al. Forefoot loading during 3 athletic tasks. American Journal of Sports Medicine 2007, 25(4):630-636.
7. Dixon S.J., Stiles V.H. Impact absorption of tennis shoe-surface combinations. Sports Engineering 2003, 6(1):1-10.
8. Ford K.R., Manson N.A., Evans B.J., et al. Comparison of in-shoe foot loading patterns on natural grass and synthetic turf. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 2006, 9(6):433-440.
9. Girard O., Eicher F., Fourchet F., et al. Effects of the playing surface on plantar pressures and potential injuries in tennis. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2007, 41(11):733-738.
10. Tessutti V., Trombini-Souza F., Ribeiro A.P., et al. In-shoe plantar pressure distribution during running on natural grass and asphalt in recreational runners. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 2010, 13(1):151-155.
11. Tillman M.D., Fiolkowski P., Bauer J.A., et al. In-shoe plantar measurements during running on different surfaces: changes in temporal and kinetic parameters. Sports Engineering 2002, 5(3):121-128.
12. Cavanagh P.R., Lafortune M.A. Ground reaction forces in distance running. Journal of Biomechanics 1980, 13(5):397-406.
13. Hreljac A. Impact and overuse injuries in runners. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2004, 36(5):845-849.
14. Willems T.M., Witvrouw E., De Cock A., et al. Gait-related risk factors for exercise-related lower-leg pain during shod running. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2007, 39(2):330-339.
15. Ferber R., Davis I.M., Williams D.S. Gender differences in lower extremity mechanics during running. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 2003, 18(4):350-357.
16. Hardin E.C., van den Bogert A.J., Hamill J. Kinematic adaptations during running: effects of footwear, surface, and duration. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2004, 36(5):838-844.
17. Burnfield J.M., Few C.D., Mohamed O.S., et al. The influence of walking speed and footwear on plantar pressures in older adults. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 2004, 19(1):78-84.
18. Hong Y., Wang L., Li J.X., et al. Changes in running mechanics using conventional shoelace versus elastic shoe cover. Journal of Sports Sciences 2011, 29(4):373-379.
19. Dixon S.J., Collop A.C., Batt M.E. Surface effects on ground reaction forces and lower extremity kinematics in running. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2000, 32(11):1919-1926.
20. Feehery R.V. The biomechanics of running on different surfaces. Clinics in Pediatric Medicine and Surgery 1986, 3(4):649-659.
21. Ferris D.P., Louie M., Farley C.T. Running in the real world: adjusting leg stiffness for different surfaces. Proceedings Biological Sciences 1998, 265(1400):989-994.
22. Derrick T.R. The effects of knee contact angle on impact forces and accelerations. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2004, 36(5):832-837.
23. Savelberg H.H., Vorstenbosch M.A., Kamman E.H., et al. Intra-stride belt-speed variation affects treadmill locomotion. Gait and Posture 1998, 7(1):26-34.
24. White S.C., Yack H.J., Tucker C.A., et al. Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill walking. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1998, 30(10):1537-1542.
25. Paolini G., Della Croce U., Riley P.O., et al. Testing of a tri-instrumented-treadmill unit for kinetic analysis of locomotion tasks in static and dynamic loading conditions. Medical Engineering and Physics 2006, 29(3):404-411.
26. Chen W.P., Tang F.T., Ju C.W. Stress distribution of the foot during mid-stance to push-off in barefoot gait: a 3-D finite element analysis. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 2001, 16(7):614-620.
27. Novachek T.F. The biomechanics of running. Gait and Posture 1998, 7(1):77-95.
28. Hockenbury R.T. Forefoot problems in athletes. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1999, 31(S7):s448-s458.
29. Nigg B.M., De Boer R.W., Fisher V. A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill running. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1995, 27(1):98-105.