Stage-discharge hysteresis evidenced by multi-ADCP measurements

River Flow 2012 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics

Volumn 2, Issue , 2012, Pages 1277-1283

  Le Coz, J ^a   Pobanz, K ^b   Faure, J B ^a   Pierrefeu, G ^c   Blanquart, B ^d   Choquette, Y ^e  

^a CENTRE DE LYON VILLEURBANNE   (France)

^b River Systems and Climate Hazards Division   (France)

^c CNR CACOH Compagnie Nationale du Rhône   (France)

^d Institut de Recherche D'Hydro Québec ^*

^e HYDRO QUÉBEC   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISCHARGE MEASUREMENTS; HYDRODYNAMIC MODEL; INTERCOMPARISONS; INTERLABORATORY TESTS; MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY; NATURAL RIVER; PRESSURE SIGNAL; SHORT DURATIONS; STAGE-DISCHARGE; STEADY CONDITIONS; TIME-INTEGRATION; TRANSIENT FLOW; VELOCITY SIGNALS;

GERMANIUM; HYDRAULICS; HYSTERESIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

STREAM FLOW;

EID: 84867976574     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. GUM(2008). Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM member organizations (BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML), 120 p.
2. Herschy, R. (2002). The uncertainty in a current meter measurement. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 13, 281-284.
3. ISO 748 (2007). Hydrometry - Measurement of liquid flow in open channels using current-meters or floats. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 46 p.
4. ISO 5725-2 (1994). Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 2: Basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 42 p.
5. ISO 21748 (2010). Guidance for the use of repeatability, reproducibility and trueness estimates in measurement uncertainty estimation. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 38 p.
6. Jones, B. (1916). A method of correcting river discharge for a changing stage.Water Supply Paper 375 375, 117-130., U.S. Geological Survey.
7. Muste, M., Ho, H-C., and Kim, D. (2011). Considerations on direct stream flow measurements using video imagery: Outlook and research needs. Journal of Hydroenvironment Research 5, 289-300.
8. Pelletier, P. (1988). Uncertainties in the single determination of river discharge: a literature review. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 15, 834-850.
9. Pobanz, K., Le Coz, J., and Pierrefeu, G. (2011). Intercomparison of ADCPs on the Rhône downstream of Génissiat dam (2010/10/12-15). Technical report, Groupe Doppler, 59 p.
10. Rantz, S. (1982). Measurement and computation of streamflow, Volume 1, Measurement of stage and discharge, Water-Supply Paper 2175. Washington: U. S. Geological Survey.
11. Schmidt, A. (2002). Analysis of stage-discharge relations for open-channel flows and their associated uncertainties. Ph. D. thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 329 p.
12. Souhar, O., and Faure, J.-B. (2009). Approach for uncertainty propagation and design in SaintVenant equations via automatic sensitive derivatives applied to Saar river. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 36 (7), 1144-1154.