Liaison and schwa deletion in French : An effect of lexical frequency and competition?

EUROSPEECH 2001 - SCANDINAVIA - 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 639-642

  Fougeron, C ^a   Goldman, J P ^a   Frauenfelder, U H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION;

CO-OCCURRENCE; LEXICAL FREQUENCY; LEXICAL RECOGNITION; NEIGHBOURHOOD; NOCV1; SPEECH CORPORA;

SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

EID: 84867944118     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Lucci, V. Etude phonétique du français contemporain à travers la variation situationnelle. U. de Grenoble Publisher, 1983.
2. Agren, J. "Etude sur quelques liaisons facultatives dans le français de conversation radiophonique : fréquence et facteurs". Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 10, 1973.
3. Hansen, A.B. "Etude du E caduc". J. of French Language Studies, 4, 25-54, 1994.
4. Dell, F. Les règles et les sons, Paris:Hermann, 1973.
5. Racine, I & Grosjean F. "La fenêtre ou la f'nêtre: le E caduc facultatif l'est-il réellement?", submitted.
6. Lindblom, B "Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory". Hardcastle et al. Speech Production and Speech Modelling, 403-439, Kluwer, 1990.
7. Cooper, W.E. & Paccia Cooper, J. Syntax and speech. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard U. Press, 1980.
8. Wright, R. "Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation", to appear in Labphon6, 1998.
9. Content A., Mousty P., Radeau M. "Brulex" L'Année Psycholgique, 90, 551-566, 1990.
10. Adda-Decker M & et al. "Pronunciation Variants in French: schwa & liaison", ICPhS 99, 2239-2242, 1999.