Readability of informed consent documents (1987-2007) for clinical trials: A linguistic analysis

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 67-78

  Sand, K ^a   Eik Nes, N L ^a   Loge, J H ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Cancer; Clinical trials; Informed consent documents; Patient education; Written patient information

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; READING; RESEARCH SUBJECT;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COMPREHENSION; CONSENT FORMS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; READING; RESEARCH SUBJECTS;

EID: 84867941868     PISSN: 15562646     EISSN: 15562654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.4.67     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. BAKER, M. T. & TAUB, H. A. (1983). Readability of informed consent forms for research in a Veterans Administration medical center. Journal of the American Medical Association, 250(19), 2646-2648. (Pubitemid 14225134)
2. BERGER, O., GRØNBERG, B. H., SAND, K., KAASA, S., & LOGE, J. H. (2009). The length of consent documents in oncological trials is doubled in twenty years. Annals of Oncology, 20(2), 379-385.
3. CLEREHAN, R. & BUCHBINDER, R. (2006). Toward a more valid account of functional text quality: The case of the patient information leaflet. Text & Talk, 26(1), 39-68.
4. CLEREHAN, R., BUCHBINDER, R., & MOODIE, J. (2005). A linguistic framework for assessing the quality of written patient information: Its use in assessing methotrexate information for rheumatoid arthritis. Health Education Research, 20(3), 334-344. (Pubitemid 40732819)
5. CLEREHAN, R., HIRSH, D., & BUCHBINDER, R. (2009). Medication information leaflets for patients: The further validation of an analytic linguistic framework. Communication and Medicine, 6(2), 117-127.
6. CRISCIONE, L. G., SUGARMAN, J., SANDERS, L., PISETSKY, D. S., & ST. CLAIR, E. W. (2003). Informed consent in a clinical trial of a novel treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 49(3), 361-367. (Pubitemid 36682404)
7. ERLEN, J. A. (2010). Informed consent: Revisiting the issues. Orthopaedic Nursing, 29(4), 276-280.
8. FINNIE, R. K., FELDER, T. M., LINDER, S. K., & MULLEN, P. D. (2010). Beyond reading level: A systematic review of the suitability of cancer education print and Web-based materials. Journal of Cancer Education, 25(4), 497-505.
9. FLESCH, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 221-223.
10. FRY, E. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11(7), 513-516, 575-578.
11. GOLDSTEIN, A. O., FRASIER, P., CURTIS, P., REID, A., & KREHER, N. E. (1996). Consent form readability in university-sponsored research. Journal of Family Practice, 42(6), 606-611. (Pubitemid 26188707)
12. GROSSMAN, S. A., PIANTADOSI, S., & COVAHEY, C. (1994). Are informed consent forms that describe clinical oncology research protocols readable by most patients and their families? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 12(10), 2211-2215. (Pubitemid 24356041)
13. GUNNING, R. (1952). The technique of clear writing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. HIRSH, D., CLEREHAN, R., STAPLES, M., OSBORNE, R. H., & BUCHBINDER, R. (2009). Patient assessment of medication information leaflets and validation of the Evaluative Linguistic Framework (ELF). Patient Education and Counseling, 77(2), 248-254.
15. JEFFORD, M. & MOORE, R. (2008). Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents. Lancet Oncology, 9(5), 485-493. (Pubitemid 351597797)
16. JOFFE, S., COOK, E. F., CLEARY, P. D., CLARK, J. W., & WEEKS, J. C. (2001). Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: A cross-sectional survey. Lancet, 358(9295), 1772-1777. (Pubitemid 33153003)
17. KNAPP, P., RAYNOR, D. K., SILCOCK, J., & PARKINSON, B. (2011). Can user testing of a clinical trial patient information sheet make it fit-for-purpose? A randomized controlled trial. BMC Medicine, 9, 89.
18. LOVERDE, M. E., PROCHAZKA, A. V., & BYYNY, R. L. (1989). Research consent forms: Continued unreadability and increasing length. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 4(5), 410-412. (Pubitemid 19233782)
19. LYNOE, N., SANDLUND, M., DAHLQVIST, G., & JACOBSSON, L. (1991). Informed consent: Study of quality of information given to participants in a clinical trial. British Medical Journal, 303(6803), 610-613.
20. MEADE, C. D. & HOWSER, D. M. (1992). Consent forms: How to determine and improve their readability. Oncology Nursing Forum, 19(10), 1523-1528.
21. MEADE, C. D. & SMITH, C. F. (1991). Readability formulas: Cautions and critera. Patient Education and Counseling, 17(2), 153-158.
22. MURPHY, J., GAMBLE, G., & SHARPE, N. (1994). Readability of subject information leaflets for medical research. New Zealand Medical Journal, 107(991), 509-510.
23. NYSTRAND, M. (1986). The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers. Orlando: Academic.
24. OGLOFF, J. R. & OTTO, R. K. (1991). Are research participants truly informed? Readability of informed consent forms used in research. Ethics and Behavior, 1(4), 239-252.
25. PETERSON, B. T., CLANCY, S. J., CHAMPION, K., & MCLARTY, J. W. (1992). Improving readability of consent forms: What the computers may not tell you. IRB, 14(6), 6-8.
26. PHILIPSON, S. J., DOYLE, M. A., GABRAM, S. G., NIGHTINGALE, C., & PHILIPSON, E. H. (1995). Informed consent for research: A study to evaluate readability and processability to effect change. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 43(5), 459-467.
27. PICHERT, J. & ELAM, P. (1985). Readability formulas may mislead you. Patient Education and Counseling, 7(2), 181-191.
28. RIVERA, R., REED, J. S., & MENIUS, D. (1992). Evaluating the readability of informed consent forms used in contraceptive clinical trials. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 38(3), 227-230.
29. SAND, K., BERGER, O., LOGE, J., GRØNBERG, B., & KAASA, S. (2008). Lung cancer patients' perceptions of informed consent documents. Patient Education and Counseling, 73(2), 313-317.
30. SCHRIVER, K. A. (1997). Dynamics in document design. New York: Wiley Computer.
31. SCHULTZ, A. L., PARDEE, G., & ENSINCK, J. W. (1975). Are research subjects really informed? Western Journal of Medicine, 123(1), 76-80.
32. SHARP, S. M. (2004). Consent documents for oncology trials: Does anybody read these things? American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27(6), 570-575. (Pubitemid 39603270)
33. TARNOWSKI, K. J., ALLEN, D. M., MAYHALL, C., & KELLY, P. A. (1990). Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms. Pediatrics, 85(1), 58-62. (Pubitemid 20029049)
34. World Medical Association (WMA). (2008). WMA Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Retrieved from http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/.