Validation of a method for odor sampling on solid area sources

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 66, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1607-1613

  Capelli, L ^a   Sironi, S ^a   Barczak, R ^b   Il Grande, M ^c   Del Rosso, R ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^c NA Porpora 147   (Italy)

Author keywords

Forced convection; Mass transfer coefficient; Passive area sources; Volatilization model; Wind tunnel

Indexed keywords

AREA SOURCES; EXPERIMENTAL SETUP; LABORATORY TEST; ODOROUS COMPOUNDS; SOLID SURFACE; THEORETICAL MODELS; VOLATILIZATION MODELS; VOLATILIZATION PROCESS;

FORCED CONVECTION; MASS TRANSFER; ODOR REMOVAL;

WIND TUNNELS;

ACETONE; WATER;

CONVECTION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; MASS TRANSFER; MODEL VALIDATION; ODOR; SAMPLING; THEORETICAL STUDY; VOLATILIZATION; WIND TUNNEL;

AIR SAMPLING; ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ODOR; ODOR SAMPLING; SOLID; SURFACE PROPERTY; THEORETICAL MODEL; VALIDATION STUDY; VOLATILIZATION; WIND;

AIR POLLUTANTS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ODORS; SPECIMEN HANDLING;

EID: 84867919742     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2012.361     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Bockreis, A. & Steinberg, I. 2005 Measurement of odour with focus on sampling techniques. Waste Management 25, 859-863. (Pubitemid 41323812)
2. Capelli, L., Sironi, S., Del Rosso, R. & Céntola, P. 2009 Design and validation of awind tunnel systemfor odour sampling on liquid area sources. Water Science and Technology 59, 1611-1620.
3. CEN 2003 EN 13725:2003. Air quality - Determination of odour concentration by dynamic olfactometry. Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN), Brussels.
4. Frechen, F. B., Frey, M., Wett, M. & Löser, C. 2004 Aerodynamic performance of a low-speed wind tunnel. Water Science and Technology 50, 57-64. (Pubitemid 39264265)
5. Gostelow, P., Longhurst, P. J., Parsons, S. A. & Stuetz, R. M. 2003 Sampling for Measurement of Odours. IWA Scientific and Technical Report No. 17, IWA Publishing, London, UK.
6. Hudson, N. & Ayoko, G. A. 2008a Odour Sampling 1: Physical chemistry considerations. Bioresource Technology 99, 3982-3992. (Pubitemid 351380789)
7. Hudson, N. & Ayoko, G. A. 2008b Odour Sampling. 2. Comparison of physical and aerodynamic characteristics of sampling devices: a review. Bioresource Technology 99, 3993-4007. (Pubitemid 351380788)
8. Hudson, N. & Ayoko, G. A. 2009 Comparison of emission rate values for odour and odorous chemicals derived from two sampling devices. Atmospheric Environment 43, 3175-3181.
9. Leyris, C., Guillot, J. M., Fanlo, J. L. & Pourtier, L. 2005 Comparison and development of dynamic flux chambers to determine odorous compound emission rates from area sources. Chemosphere 59, 415-421. (Pubitemid 40341907)
10. Thibodeaux, L. J. & Scott, H. D. 1985 Air/soil exchange coefficients. In: Environmental Exposure from Chemicals, Volume I (Brock Neely & G. E. Blau eds.). CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.
11. Zhang, H., Lindberg, S. E., Barnett, M. O., Vette, A. F. & Gustin, M. S. 2002 Dynamic flux chamber measurement of gaseous emission fluxes over soils. Part 1: simulation of gaseous mercury emissions from soils using a two-resistance exchange interface model. Atmospheric Environment 36, 835-846. (Pubitemid 34059290)