Innovation gaming: An immersive experience environment enabling co-creation

Handbook of Research on Serious Games as Educational, Business and Research Tools

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-24

  Pallot, Marc ^a   Le Marc, Céline ^b   Richir, Simon ^b   Schmidt, Colin ^c   Mathieu, Jean Pierre ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b ARTS ET MÉTIERS PARISTECH   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DU MAINE   (France)

^d AUDENCIA BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867912991     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-0149-9.ch001     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Aarts, E. H. L., & Marzano, S. (2003). The new everyday: Views on ambient intelligence, (p. 46). 010 Publishers. ISBN 9789064505027.
2. Adams, E. (2009). Sorting out the genre muddle. Gamasutra. Retrieved April, 30, 2011, from http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/4074/the_designers_notebook_sorting_.php?page=2
3. Ahdell, R., & Andresen, G. (2001). Games and simulations in workplace eLearning: How to align eLearning content with learner needs, (pp. 1-158). Master of Science Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
4. Alvarez, J. (2007). Du jeu vidéo au Serious game, Approches culturelles, pragmatiques et formelle. Spécialité science de la communication et de l'information. Université TOULOUSE II - Toulouse le Mirail/Université TOULOUSE III - Paul Sabatier.
5. Battarbee, K. (2004). Co-experience: Understanding user experiences in social interaction. Publication series of the University of Art and Design. Helsinki A 51. Academic dissertation. Helsinki, Finland: Yleisjäljennös -Painopörssi.
6. Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
7. Bonfils, P., & Dumas, P. (2007). Mondes persistants et enseignement à distance: De nouvelles perspectives. In La problématique du changement, Marseille, colloque TICE Méditerranée.
8. Bothos, E., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas, G. (2008). Idea selection and information aggregation markets. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, June 28-30, 2008, Estoril, Portugal.
9. Caillois, R. (Ed.). (1992). Les jeux et les hommes. Folio Essais.
10. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
11. Cornu, J. M. (Ed.). (2004). La coopération, nouvelles approches. Retrieved February 2011 from http://www.cornu.eu.org/texts/cooperation
12. Damian, D. (2001). An empirical study of requirements engineering in distributed software projects: Is distance negotiation more effective? In the Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), Macau, December 2001.
13. de Ruyter, B., van Loenen, E., & Teeven, V. (2007). User centered research in ExperienceLab. European Conference, AmI 2007, LNCS Volume 4794/2007, Darmstadt, Germany, November 7-10, 2007, Springer.
14. Dourish, P. (2004). What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(1), 19-30. doi:10.1007/s00779-003-0253-8
15. Edugame. (2006). L'école active. Retrieved from http://edugame.ifage.ch/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=38&Itemid=29.
16. Erickson, T., & Kellogg, W. A. (2000). Social translucence: An approach to designing systems that support social processes. [TOCHI]. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1), 59-83. doi:10.1145/344949.345004
17. Fleming, J. (1998). Web navigation: Designing the user experience. O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.
18. Forlizzi, J. (2007). Product ecologies: Understanding the context of use surrounding products. Ph.D. Dissertation. Retrieved November 2010, from http://goodgestreet.com/docs/Forlizzi-May07.pdf
19. Forlizzi, J., & Ford, S. (2000). The building blocks of experience: An early framework for interaction designers. Designing Interactive Systems 2000 Conference Proceedings, New York, NY, (pp. 419-423).
20. Frappaolo, C., & Keldsen, D. (2008). What is Web 2.0? Association for Information and Image Management. Retrieved January 2009 from http://www.aiim.org/What-is-Web-2.0.aspx
21. Frasca (2001). Videogames of the oppressed: Videogames as a means for critical thinking and debate. Master Thesis of Information Design and Technology, Georgia Institute of Technology.
22. Frété, C. (2002). Le potentiel du jeu video pour l'education. Mémoire pour l'obtention du DESS STAF. University of Geneva.
23. Garrett, J. (2002). Elements of user experience: User-centered design for the Web. New Riders Press.
24. Genvo, S. (2006). Le game design de jeux vidéo: Approches de l'expression vidéoludique. L'Harmattan., ISBN-13, 978-2747591034.
25. Goleman, D. (2006). Social intelligence: The new science of human relationships. Bantam Books.
26. Guellerin, C., Degouzon, F., & Saysana, M. (2010). Yearbook 2008-2010. Ecole de Design Nantes Atlantique.
27. Hassenzahl, M. (2003). The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In Blythe, M., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A., & Wright, P. (Eds.), Funology: From usability to enjoyment (pp. 31-42). Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/1-4020-2967-5_4
28. Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience - A research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91-97. doi:10.1080/01449290500330331
29. Henriot, J. (1989). Sous couleur de jouer. Paris, France: José Corti.
30. Hohmann, L. (2007). Innovation games: Creating breakthrough products through collaborative play (pp. 47-124). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
31. Hourst, B., & Thiagarajan, S. (2007). Modèles de jeux de formation, Les jeux cadres de Thiagi. Editions d'Organisation.
32. Hubbard, D. W. (2007). How to measure anything: Finding the value of intangibles in business. John Wiley & Sons.
33. Isaac, H. (2001). L'entreprise numérique: Quelle réalité en France. Université Paris Dauphine. Observatoire e-management Dauphine-Cegos.
34. ISO FDIS 9241-210. (2009). Ergonomics of human system interaction - Part 210: Human-centered design for interactive systems (formerly known as 13407). International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
35. ISTAG Report on Experience Application Research (EAR). (2004). Involving users in the development of ambient intelligence. European Commission - IST 2004 - Retrieved February 2011 from http://www.cordis.lu/ist/istag.htm
36. Itin, C. M. (1999). Reasserting the philosophy of experiential education as a vehicle for change in the 21st century. Journal of Experiential Education, 22(2), 91-98.
37. Kirriermuir, J. (2002). Video gaming, education and digital learning technologies, relevance and opportunities. D-Lib Magazine, 8(2). ISSN 1082_9873
38. Le Marc, C., Mathieu, J. P., Pallot, M., & Richir, S. (2010). Serious gaming: From learning experience towards user experience. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, ICE'2010 "Collaborative Environments for Sustainable Innovation", Lugano, Switzerland, June 2010
39. Levy, P. (1997). L'intelligence collective - Pour une anthropologie du cyberspace. La Découverte., ISBN-13, 978-2707126931.
40. Linhart, D. (Ed.). (2004). La modernisation des entreprises. La Découverte.
41. Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (1997). Virtual teams. Reaching across space, time and organizations with technology. John Wiley & Sons.
42. Luft, J., & Ingham, H. (1955). The Johari window, a graphic model of interpersonal awareness. Proceedings of the Western Training Laboratory in Group Development. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA.
43. Missant, B. (2009). Des ateliers Montessori à l'école, une expérience en maternelle. Editeur ESF.
44. Mulder, I., & Stappers, P. J. (2009). Co-creating in practice: Results and challenges. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, ICE'2010, Collaborative Innovation: Emerging Technologies, Environments and Communities, Leiden, The Netherlands, June 2009.
45. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
46. Norman, D. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
47. O'Reilly T., & Battelle, J. (2009). Web squared: Web 2.0 five years on. Special Report, Web 2.0 Summit, Co-Produced by O'REILLY & Techweb.
48. Pallot, M. (2009a). The Living Lab approach: A user centred open innovation ecosystem. Webergence Blog. Retrieved from http://www.cwe-projects.eu/pub/bscw.cgi/715404
49. Pallot, M. (2009b) ECOSPACE survey on barriers affecting collaboration effectiveness and efficiency. ECOPSACE Newsletter, 11-12.
50. Pallot, M. (2010b). COIN4LL white paper: Towards a service platform for Living Labs. In Pallot, M. (Ed.), Unleashing user-centred open innovation from enterprise collaboration and interoperability, the Living Lab Way. COIN Project.
51. Pallot, M., Martinez-Carreras, M. A., & Prinz, W. (2010a). Collaborative distance: A framework for distance factors affecting the performance of distributed collaboration. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 6(2), 1-32. doi:10.4018/jec.2010040101
52. Pallot, M., Richir, S., & Samier, H. (2008). Shared workspace and group blogging experimentation through a Living Lab approach. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, ICE'2008, A New Wave of Innovation in Collaborative Networks, Lisbon, Portugal, 23-25 June 2008.
53. Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Senach, B., & Scapin, D. (2010c). Living Lab research landscape: From user centred design and user experience towards user cocreation. In Proceedings of the Living Lab Summer School, Paris, Cité des Sciences, August 2010.
54. Peyronie, H. (1999). Célestin Freinet: Pédagogie et emancipation. Hachette., ISBN-13, 978-2011705914.
55. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Coopting customer competence. Harvard Business Review, January.
56. Prensky, M. (2002). The motivation of gameplay or the real 21st century learning revolution. Horizon, 10(1). doi:10.1108/10748120210431349
57. Ramaswamy, V., & Gouillart, F. (2010). The power of co-creation: Build it with them to boost growth, productivity, and profits. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, FreePress.
58. Riedel, J., Sakiroglu, M., Pawar, K., & Johal, P. (2007). Knowledge creation in physical and virtual teams - Results from experiments with Cosiga. 13th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: Concurrent Innovation: An Emerging Paradigm for Collaboration and Competitiveness in the Extended Enterprise, 4-6 June 2007, Sophia Antipolis, France.
59. Rosell, G. (1994). The human dimension. In Dahlin, T. (Eds.), The human dimension: Swedish industrial design (pp. 16-22).
60. Salakari, H. (2007). Learning practical skills in a virtual environment: A pedagogical model for simulator-based harvester operator training. Academic Dissertation. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 1230.
61. Salminen, J., Konsti-Laakso, S., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., & Senach, B. (2011). Evaluating user involvement within Living Labs through the use of a domain landscape. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, ICE'2011 "Innovating Products and Services for Collaborative Networks, Aachen, Germany, June 2011.
62. Sanders, E. B.-N. (2008, November 1). An evolving map of design practice and design research. Interactions Magazine.
63. Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5-18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068
64. Schmidt, C. T. A. (1997). The systemics of dialogism: On the prevalence of the self in HCI design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science American Society for Information Science, 48(11), 1073-1081. Retrieved from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/39633/ABSTRACT doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199711)48:11<1073::AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-T
65. Schmidt, C. T. A. (2001). L'esprit et la machine, une communauté conceptrice à l'œuvre. [The Mind and the Machine, a Design Community at Work], P.U.S. Section Logique, philosophie du langage. Lille, France: Presses Universitaires de Septentrion. ISBN 9-782-72954-0
66. Schmidt, C. T. A. (Ed.). (2006). Collaborative distance activities: From social cognition to electronic togetherness. AI & Society, 20(3), 243-442. Springer. ISSN 0951-5666
67. Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge. Oxford University Press.
68. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. Little, Brown.
69. Susi, J. Backlund. (2007). Beyond the hype. A Hebbel-Seeger - Medien & Bildung. Springer.
70. Valette, T. (2005). Recherche d'un cadre conceptuel d'aide à la conception collective innovante par l'usage Génie industriel. Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers Centre de Paris: 209.
71. Veillon, F. (2001). Des réseaux de jeux à la socialité virtuelle. Revue Médiamorphoses, n°3, Qui a encore peur des jeux vidéo? (p. 80).
72. Virole, B. (Ed.). (2003). Du bon usage des jeux vidéo et autres aventures virtuelles.
73. Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32, 791-805. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791
74. Von Hippel, E. A. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. Von Krogh, G. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
76. Winnicot, D. W. (1975). Jeu et réalité. L'espace potentiel. Paris, France: Gallimard.
77. Zyda, M. (2005). From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer, 38(9), 25-32. doi:10.1109/MC.2005.297