Functional clustering of time series gene expression data by Granger causality

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 6, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Fujita, André ^a   Severino, Patricia ^b   Kojima, Kaname ^c   Sato, João R ^d   Patriota, Alexandre G ^a   Miyano, Satoru ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b Albert Einstein Jewish Institute for Education and Research   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO ABC   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; HELA CELL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TIME;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; TIME FACTORS;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84867902634     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-137     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ng SK, McLachlan GJ, Wang K, Jones LB-T, Ng S-W. A mixture model with random-effects components for clustering correlated gene-expression profiles. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:1745-1752. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl165, 16675467.
2. Segal E, Shapira M, Regev A, Pe'er D, Botstein D, Koller D, Friedman N. Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. Nat Genet 2003, 34:166-176. 10.1038/ng1165, 12740579.
3. Shiraishi Y, et al. Inferring cluster-based networks from differently stimulated multiple time-course gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:1073-1081. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq094, 2853688, 20223837.
4. Stuart JM, Segal E, Koller D, Kim SK. A gene co-expression network for global discovery of conserved genetics modules. Science 2003, 302:249-55. 10.1126/science.1087447, 12934013.
5. Yamaguchi R, Yoshida R, Imoto S, Higuchi T, Miyano S. Finding module-based networks with state-space models - mining high-dimensional and short time-course gene expression data. IEEE Signal Process Mag 2007, 24:37-46.
6. Granger CWJ. Investigating causal relationships by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 1969, 37:424-438.
7. Ahmed HA, Mahanta P, Bhattacharyya DK, Kalita JK. GERC: tree based clustering for gene expression data. 11th IEEE Int Conference Bioinf Bioeng 2011, 299-302.
8. Bandyopadhyay S, Bhattacharyya M. A biologically inspired measure for coexpression analysis. IEEE/ACM Trans comput biol bioinf 2011, 8:929-942.
9. Fujita A, Sato JR, Garay-Malpartida HM, Morettin PA, Sogayar MC, Ferreira CE. Time-varying modeling of gene expression regulatory networks using wavelet dynamic vector autoregressive method. Bioinformatics 2007a, 23:16253-1630.
10. Fujita A, Sato JR, Garay-Malpartida HM, Yamaguchi R, Miyano S, Sogayar MC, Ferreira CE. Modeling gene expression regulatory networks with the sparse vector autoregressive model. BMC Syst Biol 2007b, 1:39.
11. Fujita A, Sato JR, Garay-Malpartida HM, Sogayar MC, Ferreira CE, Miyano S. Modeling nonlinear gene regulatory networks from time-series gene expression data. J Bioinf Comput Biol 2008, 6:961-79.
12. Fujita A, Patriota AG, Sato JR, Miyano S. The impact of measurement error in the identification of regulatory networks. BMC Bioinf 2009, 10:412.
13. Guo S, Wu J, Ding M, Feng J. Uncovering interactions in the frequency domain. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4:e1000087. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000087, 2398781, 18516243.
14. Kojima K, Fujita A, Shimamura T, Imoto S, Miyano S. Estimation of nonlinear gene regulatory networks via L1 regularized NVAR from time series gene expression data. Genome Informatics 2008, 20:37-51.
15. Lozano AC, Abe N, Liu Y, Rosset S. Grouped graphical Granger modeling for gene expression regulatory networks discovery. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:i110-i118. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp199, 2687953, 19477976.
16. Mukhopadhyay ND, Chatterjee S. Causality and pathway search in microarray time series experiments. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:442-449. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl598, 17158516.
17. Nagarajan R. A note on inferring acyclic network structures using Granger causality tests. Int J Biostatistics 2009, 5:10.
18. Shojaie A, Michailidis G. Discovering graphical Granger causality using the truncating lasso penalty. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:i517-i523. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq377, 2935442, 20823316.
19. Baccala LA, Sameshima K. Partial directed coherence: A new concept in neural structure determination. Biol Cybernetics 2001, 84:463-474.
20. Fujita A, Sato JR, Kojima K, Gomes LR, Nagasaki M, Sogayar MC, Miyano S. Identification of Granger causality between gene sets. J Bioinf Comput Biol 2010a, 8:679-701.
21. Fujita A, Kojima K, Patriota AG, Sato JR, Severino P, Miyano S. A fast and robust statistical test based on Likelihood ratio with Bartlett correction to identify Granger causality between gene sets. Bioinformatics 2010b, 26:2349-2351.
22. Sato JR, Fujita A, Cardoso EF, Thomaz CE, Brammer MJ, Amaro E. Analyzing the connectivity between regions of interest: An approach based on cluster Granger causality for fMRI data analysis. NeuroImage 2010, 52:1444-1455. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.022, 20472076.
23. Tononi G, McIntosh AR, Russel DP, Edelman GM. Functional clustering: identifying strongly interactive brain regions in neuroimaging data. NeuroImage 1998, 7:133-149. 10.1006/nimg.1997.0313, 9558645.
24. Edachery J, Sen A, Brandenburg F. Graph clustering using distance-k cliques. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Graph Drawing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. vol. 1731 1999-1999. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag GmbH, Smith Y.
25. Ng A, et al. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2002, New York: MIT Press.
26. Bhattacharya A, De RK. Divisive correlation clustering algorithm (DCCA) for grouping of genes: detecting varying patterns in expression profiles. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:1359-1366. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn133, 18407922.
27. Ihmels J, Bergmann S, Berman J, Barkai N. Comparative gene expression analysis by differential clustering approach: applications to the Candida albicans transcription program. PLoS Genet 2005, 1:e39. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010039, 1239936, 16470937.
28. Rousseeuw PJ. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J Comput Appl Math 1987, 20:53-65.
29. Celeux G, Govaert G. A classification EM algorithm for clustering and two stochastic versions. Comput Stat Data Anal 1992, 14:315-332.
30. Whitfield ML, Sherlock G, Saldanha AJ, Murray JI, Ball CA, Alexander KE, Matese JC, Perou CM, Hurt MM, Brown PO, Botstein D. Identification of genes periodically expressed in the human cell cycle and their expression in tumors. Mol Biol Cell 2002, 13:1977-2000. 10.1091/mbc.02-02-0030., 117619, 12058064.
31. Lee TL, Yeh J, Friedman J, Yan B, Yang X, Yeh NT, Waes CV, Chen Z. A signal network involving coactivated NF-κB and STAT3 and altered p53 modulates BAX/BCL-XL expression and promotes cell survival of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer 2008, 122:1987-1998. 10.1002/ijc.23324, 18172861.
32. Lungu G, Covaleda L, Mendes O, Martini-Stoica H, Stoica G. FGF-1-induced matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression in breast cancer cells is mediated by increased activities of NF-κB and activating protein-1. Mol Carcinog 2008, 47:424-435. 10.1002/mc.20398, 18041768.
33. Drafahl KA, McAndrew CW, Meyer AN, Haas M, Donoghue DJ. The Receptor Tyrosine Kinase FGFR4 Negatively Regulates NF-kappaB Signaling. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e14412. 10.1371/journal.pone.0014412, 3008709, 21203561.
34. Krishna R, Li CT, Buchanan-Wollaston V. A temporal precedence based clustering method for gene expression microarray data. BMC Bioinf 2010, 11:68.
35. Witten DM, Tibshirani R, Hastie T. A penalized matrix decomposition, with applications to sparse principal components and canonical correlation analysis. Biostatistics 2010, 10:515-534.
36. Hardoon DR, Shawe-Taylor J. Sparse canonical correlation analysis. Machine Learning 2011, 83:331-353.
37. Shi J, Malik J. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intelligence 2000, 22:888-905.