Calling song signals and temporal preference functions in the cricket Teleogryllus leo

Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology

Volumn 198, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 817-825

  Rothbart, M M ^a   Hennig, R M ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acoustic communication; Auditory processing; Cricket; Phonotaxis; Song pattern

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867902100     PISSN: 03407594     EISSN: 14321351     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00359-012-0751-0     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
2. Barth FG, Schmitt A (1991) Species recognition and species isolation in wandering spiders (Cupiennius spp.; Ctenidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29: 333-339.
3. Beckers OM, Schul J (2009) Developmental plasticity of mating calls enables acoustic communication in diverse environments. Proc R Soc Lond B 275: 1243-1248.
4. Bentley DR, Hoy RR (1972) Genetic control of the neuronal network generating cricket (Teleogryllus, Gryllus) song patterns. Anim Behav 20: 478-492.
5. Bush SL, Beckers OM, Schul J (2009) A complex mechanism of call recognition in the katydid Neoconocephalus affinis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). J Exp Biol 212: 648-655.
6. Deily JA, Schul J (2004) Recognition of calls with exceptionally fast pulse rates: female phonotaxis in the genus Neoconocephalus (Orthoptera: Tettingoiidae). J Exp Biol 207: 3523-3529.
7. Deily JA, Schul J (2009) Selective phonotaxis in Neoconocephalus nebrascensis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae): call recognition at two temporal scales. J Comp Physiol A 195: 31-37.
8. Desutter-Grandcolas L, Robillard T (2003) Phylogeny and the evolution of calling songs in Gryllus (Insecta, Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Zool Scripta 32: 173-183.
9. Doherty JA (1985) Trade-off phenomena in calling song recognition and phonotaxis in the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol 156: 787-801.
10. Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 139: 125-153.
11. Gerhardt HC (1991) Female mate choice in tree frogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim Behav 42: 615-635.
12. Grobe B, Rothbart M, Hanschke A, Hennig RM (2012) Auditory processing at two time scales by the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. J Exp Biol 215: 1681-1690.
13. Hedwig B, Poulet JFA (2004) Complex auditory behaviour emerges from simple reactive steering. Nature 430: 781-785.
14. Hennig RM (2003) Acoustic feature extraction by cross-correlation in crickets? J Comp Physiol A 189: 589-598.
15. Hennig RM (2009) Walking in Fourier's space: algorithms for the computation of periodicities in song patterns by the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Comp Physiol A 195: 971-987.
16. Hennig RM, Weber T (1997) Filtering of temporal parameters of the calling song by cricket females of two closely related species: a behavioral analysis. J Comp Physiol A 180: 621-630.
17. Hildebrandt KJ, Benda J, Hennig RM (2011) Multiple arithmetic operations in a single neuron: the recruitment of adaptation processes in the cricket auditory pathway depends on sensory context. J Neurosci 31: 14142-14150.
18. Hill KG, Loftus-Hills JJ, Gartside DF (1972) Pre-mating isolation between the Australian field crickets Teleogryllus commodus and T. oceanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Aust J Zool 20: 153-163.
19. Honda-Sumi E (2004) Female recognition of trills in the male calling song of the field cricket, Teleogryllus taiwanemma. J Ethol 22(135): 141.
20. Huang Y, Orti G, Sutherlin M, Duhachek A, Zera A (2000) Phylogenetic relationships of North American field crickets inferred from mitochondrial DNA data. Mol Phylogn Evol 17: 48-57.
21. Imaizumi K, Pollack GS (2001) Neural representation of sound amplitude by functionally different auditory receptors in crickets. J Acoust Soc Am 109: 1247-1260.
22. Isaacson JS, Scanziani M (2011) How inhibition shapes cortical activity. Neuron 72: 231-243.
23. Otte D (1992) Evolution of cricket songs. J Orthopt Res 1: 25-49.
24. Otte D, Cade W (1983) African crickets (Gryllidae). I. Teleogryllus of Eastern and Southern Africa. Proc Acad Nat Sci Phila 135: 102-127.
25. Reinhold K (2009) Variation of acoustic courtship signals in insects and amphibians: no evidence for bimodality, but identical dependence on duration. Ethology 115: 134-140.
26. Reinhold K (2010) Variation in acoustic signalling traits exhibits footprints of sexual selection. Evolution 65: 738-745.
27. Ryan MJ (1990) Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxf Sur Evol Biol 7: 157-195.
28. Schildberger K (1984) Selectivitv of identified auditorv neurons in-the cricket brain. J Comp Physiol 155: 171-186.
29. Schneider E, Hennig RM (2012) Temporal resolution for calling song signals by female crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus. J Comp Physiol A 198: 181-191.
30. Schul J (1998) Song recognition by temporal cues in a group of closely related bushcricket species (genus Tettigonia). J Comp Physiol A 183: 401-410.
31. Snyder RL, Frederick-Hudson KH, Schul J (2009) Molecular phylogenetics of the genus Neoconocephalus (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae) and the evolution of temperate life histories. PLoS ONE 4(9): e7203. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0007203.
32. Trobe D, Schuster R, Römer H (2011) Fast and reliable decisions for a dynamic song parameter in field crickets. J Comp Physiol A 197: 131-135.
33. von Helversen O, von Helversen D (1994) Forces driving co-evolution of song and song recognition in grasshoppers. Fortschr Zool 39: 253-284.
34. Weber T, Thorson J, Huber F (1981) Auditory behaviour of the cricket. I. Dynamics of compensated walking and discrimination paradigms on the Kramer treadmill. J Comp Physiol 141: 215-232.
35. Xing D, Ringach DL, Hawken M, Shapley RM (2011) Untuned suppression makes a major contribution to the enhancement of orientation selectivity in Macaque V1. J Neurosci 31: 15972-15982.
36. Zorovic M, Hedwig B (2011) Processing of species-specific auditory patterns in the cricket brain by ascending, local, and descending neurons during standing and walking. J Neurophysiol 105: 2181-2194.