Validation of the Spanish version of the Lawton IADL Scale for its application in elderly people

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Volumn 10, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Vergara, Itziar ^a   Bilbao, Amaia ^b   Orive, Miren ^c   Garcia Gutierrez, Susana ^c   Navarro, Gemma ^e   Quintana, José M ^c,d  

^a Primary Care Research Unit Gipuzkoa Osakidetza   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL DE BASURTO   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL DE GALDAKAO   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^e L'Hospitalet de Llobregat   (Spain)

Author keywords

Elderly; IADL assessment; Lawton Scale; Psychometric properties; Reliability; Responsiveness; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; EFFECT SIZE; ELDERLY CARE; EMERGENCY CARE; FALLING; FOLLOW UP; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING SCALE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHORT FORM 12; VALIDATION STUDY; WRIST FRACTURE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPAIN; TRANSLATIONS;

EID: 84867899886     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-130     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Pearson V. Assessment of function. Assessing older persons: Measures, meaning, and practical applications 2000, 17-48. New York: Oxford University Press, Kane RL, Kane RA.
2. Ward G. A review of instrumental ADL assessments for use with elderly people. Rev Clin Gerontol 1998, 8(1):65-71.
3. Martín-Lesende I, Ortiz-Lebaniegos I, Montalvillo-Delgado A, et al. Identificación de ítems para la creación de un cuestionario de valoración de actividades nstrumentales de la vida diaria en personas mayores. Aten Primaria 2006, 7(6):313-319.
4. Kane RA, Kane RL. Evaluación de las necesidades de los ancianos: guía práctica sobre los instrumentos de medición 1990, Madrid: SG editores SA.
5. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969, 9(3):179-186. 10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179, 5349366.
6. Van der Putten JJMF, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, et al. Measuring the change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation; comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and Functional Independence Measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999, 66(4):480-484. 10.1136/jnnp.66.4.480, 1736299, 10201420.
7. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care 1996, 34(3):220-233. 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003, 8628042.
8. Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51:1171-1178. 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00109-7, 9817135.
9. Alonso J, Prieto L, Anto JM. The Spanish version of the SF-36 Health Survey (the SF-36 health questionnaire): an instrument for measuring clinical results. Med Clin 1995, 104:771-776.
10. Bilbao A, Quintana JM, Escobar A, et al. Validation of a proposed WOMAC short form for patients with hip osteoarthritis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2011, 9:75. 10.1186/1477-7525-9-75, 3189860, 21936886.
11. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833-1840.
12. Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, et al. Validation of the Spanish version of the WOMAC questionnaire for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Clin Rheumatol 2002, 21:466-471. 10.1007/s100670200117, 12447629.
13. Institute for Work & Health Spanish (Spain) translation courtesy of Dr. R.S. Rosales, MD, PhD, Institute for Research in Hand Surgery 2006, GECOT: Unidad de Cirugía de La Mano y Microcirugía Tenerife Spain, Institute for Work & Health.
14. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika 1951, 16:297-334.
15. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory 1994, New York: mMcGraw-Hill, 3.
16. Staquet MJ, Hays RD, Fayers PM. Quality of life assessment in clinical trials 1998, Oxford: Oxford Press.
17. Mulaik SA. Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychol Bull 1989, 105:430-445.
18. Muthén LK, Muthén. BO Mplus User's Guide 1998-2010, CA: Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, Sixth.
19. Batista-Foguet J, Coenders G, Alonso J. Confirmatory factor analysis. Its role on the validation of health related questionnaires. Med Clin 2004, 122(Suppl 1):21-27.
20. Devins GM, Dion R, Pelletier LG, et al. Structure of lifestyle disruptions in chronic disease: a confirmatory factor analysis of the Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale. Med Care 2001, 39:1097-1104. 10.1097/00005650-200110000-00007, 11567172.
21. Hatcher L. Developing Measurement Models with Confirmatory Factor Analysis. In A step-by-step approach to using the SAS® System for factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling 1994, 249-342. NC: SAS Institute Inc, Cary .
22. Graf C. The Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)Scale. Annals of long term care. Best Practices in Nursing Care to Older Adults From The Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing New York University, College of Nursing Issue Number 23, Revised 2007 Series Editor: Marie Boltz, MSN, APRN, BC, GNP Managing Editor: Sherry A. Greenberg, MSN, APRN, BC, GNP New York University College of Nursing 2007, 23. http://www.annalsoflongtermcare.com/article/7453 (accesed 19/10/2012).
23. Peek MK, Coward RT. Gender differences in the risk of developing disability among older adults with arthritis. J Aging Health 1999, 11:131-150. 10.1177/089826439901100201, 10558433.
24. Tomasá C, Zunzunegui MV, Moreno LA, et al. Dependencia evitable para las actividades de la vida diaria:una perspectiva de género. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 2003, 38(6):327-333.
25. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: assessment, analysis and interpretation 2000, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex.
26. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993, 46:1417-1432. 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N, 8263569.
27. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992, 112:155-159.
28. Wyrwich KW, Tierney WM, Wolinsky FD. Using the standard error of measurement to identify important change on Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Qual Life Res 2002, 11:1-7. 10.1023/A:1014485627744, 12003051.
29. Hokoishi K, Ikeda M, Maki N, et al. Interrater reliability of the Physical Self-Maintenance Scale and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale in a variety of health professional representatives. Aging and Mental Health 2001, 5:38-40. 10.1080/13607860020020627, 11513011.
30. Tong A, Man D. The Validation of the Hong Kong Chinese Version of the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale for Institutionalized Elderly Persons; OTJR. Occupation, Participation and Health 2002, 22(4):132.