Strategies for implementing genomic selection in family-based aquaculture breeding schemes: Double haploid sib test populations

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Nirea, Kahsay G ^a   Sonesson, Anna K ^b   Woolliams, John A ^a,c   Meuwissen, Theo He ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^b NOFIMA   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; AQUACULTURE; DISEASE RESISTANCE; GENOME; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; HERITABILITY; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLYPLOIDY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; SELECTION;

ANIMAL; AQUACULTURE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; FEMALE; FISH; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOME; HAPLOIDY; MALE; PEDIGREE; POPULATION; SIBLING; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; AQUACULTURE; BREEDING; FEMALE; FISHES; GENOME; HAPLOIDY; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PEDIGREE; POPULATION; SELECTION, GENETIC; SIBLINGS;

EID: 84867898726     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-30     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, Genetics 2001 157 1819 1829 11290733 (Pubitemid 32298846)
2. Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Schenkel FS, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 16 24 10.3168/jds.2008-1514 19109259
3. Invited review. Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 433 443 10.3168/jds.2008-1646 19164653
4. Genomic selection in farm animal species-Lessons learnt and future perspectives. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ, Meuwissen THE, Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to livestock Leipzig 2010 http://www.kongressband. de/wcgalp2010/assets/pdf/0701.pdf
5. More than a third of the WCGALP presentations on genomic selection. Habier D, J Anim Breed Genet 2010 127 336 337 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2010.00897.x 20831555
6. Genomic selection for crop improvement. Heffner EL, Sorrells ME, Jannink JL, Crop Sci 2009 49 1 12 10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0512
7. Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. Jannink JL, Lorenz AJ, Iwata H, Brief Funct Genomics 2010 9 166 177 10.1093/bfgp/elq001 20156985
8. Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs. Sonesson AK, Meuwissen THE, Genet Sel Evol 2009 41 37 10.1186/1297-9686-41-37 19566932
9. Comparison of accuracy of genome-wide and BLUP breeding value estimates in sib based aquaculture breeding schemes. Nielsen HM, Sonesson AK, Yazdi H, Meuwissen THE, Aquaculture 2009 289 259 264 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.01.027
10. Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA, PLoS One 2008 3 3395 10.1371/journal.pone.0003395 18852893
11. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Goddard M, Genetica 2009 136 245 257 10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0 18704696
12. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. Pszczola M, Strabel T, Mulder HA, Calus MPL, J Dairy sci 2012 95 389 400 10.3168/jds.2011-4338 22192218
13. On the use of double haploids for detecting QTL in outbred populations. Martinez VA, Hill WG, Knott SA, Heredity 2002 88 423 431 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800073 12180083 (Pubitemid 34616933)
14. Systems of mating. II. The effects of inbreeding on the genetic composition of a population. Wright S, Genetics 1921 6 124 143 17245959
15. Androgenesis, gynogenesis and the production of clones in fishes: a review. Komen H, Thorgaard GH, Aquaculture 2007 269 150 173 10.1016/j. aquaculture.2007.05.009 (Pubitemid 47058559)
16. The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations. Kimura M, Genetics 1969 61 893 903 5364968
17. The combination of linkage values, and the calculation of distances between the loci of linked factors. Haldane JBS, Genetics 1919 8 299 309
18. Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding. Sonesson AK, Meuwissen THE, Genet Sel Evol 2000 32 231 248 10.1186/1297-9686-32-3-231 14736390 (Pubitemid 30415974)
19. Accuracy of genome-wide evaluation for disease resistance in aquaculture breeding programs. Villanueva B, Fernández J, García-Cortés LA, Varona L, Daetwyler HD, Toro MA, J Anim Sci 2011 89 3433 3442 10.2527/jas.2010-3814 21742941
20. Effect of non-random mating on genomic and BLUP selection schemes. Nirea KG, Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA, Meuwissen TH, Genet Sel Evol 2012 44 11 10.1186/1297-9686-44-11 22494646
21. The effect of selection on genetic variability. Bulmer MG, Amer Nat 1971 105 201 211 10.1086/282718
22. Short term gain at the expense of long-term response with selection on identified loci. Gibson JP, Proceedings of the 5th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production University of Guelph, Guelph 1994 201 204
23. Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary stature. Galton F, J Anthropol Inst 1886 15 246 263