Managing the diffusion of low emission vehicles

IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 728-740

  Van Der Vooren, Alexander ^a   Alkemade, Floortje ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Agent based simulation; consumer adoption; infrastructure development; sustainability; technological change

Indexed keywords

AGENT BASED SIMULATION; AGENT-BASED MODEL; CHANGING ENVIRONMENT; COMPLEX TASK; CONSUMER ADOPTION; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; DECISION MAKERS; GREEN TECHNOLOGY; INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT; INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE VEHICLES; LOCK-IN; LOW EMISSION VEHICLES; POLICY MEASURES; PURCHASE PRICE; STRATEGIC DECISIONS; SUPPORT MEASURE; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; TECHNOLOGY PROVIDERS; VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY;

INDUSTRY; INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES; PUBLIC POLICY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY;

VEHICLES;

EID: 84867883403     PISSN: 00189391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2012.2185802     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. OECD. (2011). Better policies to support eco-innovation. OECD Studies on Environmental Innovation, OECD Publishing. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264096684-en
2. B. Budde, K. Weber, and F. Alkemade, "Expectations as a key to understanding actor strategies in the field of fuel cell and hydrogen vehicles," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.12.012, in press.
3. K. Safarzynska and J. van den Bergh, "Demand-supply coevolution with multiple increasing returns: Policy analysis for unlocking and system transitions," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 297-317, 2010.
4. A. van der Vooren, F. Alkemade, and M. Hekkert, "Effective public resource allocation to escape lock-in: The case of infrastructure-dependent vehicle technologies," Environ. Innovat. Societal Transit., vol. 2, pp. 98-117, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2012.01.003.
5. M. Schwoon, "Stimulating the adoption of fuel cell vehicles," J. Evolut. Econ., vol. 16, pp. 435-472, 2006. (Pubitemid 44328061)
6. F. Huétink, A. van der Vooren, and F. Alkemade, "Initial infrastructure development strategies for the transition to sustainable mobility," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 1270-1281, 2010.
7. J.-M. Dalle, "Heterogeneity vs. externalities in technological competition: A tale of possible technological landscapes," J. Evol. Econ., vol. 7, pp. 395-413, 1997. (Pubitemid 127172002)
8. F. Malerba, R. Nelson, L. Orsenigo, and S. Winter, "Demand, innovation, and the dynamics of market structure: The role of experimental users and diverse preferences," J. Evol. Econ., vol. 17, pp. 371-399, 2007.
9. O. Shy, "Technology revolutions in the presence of network externalities," Int. J. Ind. Org., vol. 14, pp. 785-800, 1996.
10. P. Windrum and C. Birchenhall, "Structural change in the presence of network externalities: A co-evolutionary model of technological successions," J. Evol. Econ., vol. 15, pp. 123-148, 2005. (Pubitemid 40579699)
11. B. Martin and R. Johnston, "Technology foresight for wiring up the national innovation system. Experiences in Britain, Austria, and New Zealand," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 60, pp. 37-54, 1999. (Pubitemid 29407625)
12. S. Dunn, "Hydrogen futures: Toward a sustainable energy system," Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 27, pp. 235-264, 2002. (Pubitemid 34036430)
13. R. Phaal, C. Farrukh, and D. Probert, "Technology roadmapping-A planning framework for evolution and revolution," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 71, pp. 5-26, 2004. (Pubitemid 38047683)
14. European Comission, EUR 23123-HyWays-the European Hydrogen Roadmap, Luxembourg, DOI 10.2777/35839.
15. J. Holland, "Complex adaptive systems," Daedalus, vol. 121, pp. 17-30, 1992.
16. J. Epstein and R. Axtell, Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science From the Bottom Up. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
17. R. Axelrod, The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1997.
18. E. Bonabeau, "Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems," PNAS, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 7280-7287, 2002. (Pubitemid 34522724)
19. W. Arthur, "Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events," Econ. J., vol. 99, pp. 116-131, 1989.
20. J. Utterback, Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1994.
21. W. Abernathy and J. Utterback, "Patterns of industrial innovation," Te c h-nol. Rev., vol. 80, pp. 40-47, Jun./Jul. 1978.
22. P. Anderson and M. Tushman, "Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change." Administ. Sci. Q., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 604-633, 1990.
23. W. Arthur, "Competing technologies: An overview," in Technical Change and Economic Theory, G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete, Eds. London, U.K.: Pinter, 1988, pp. 590-607.
24. P. David, "Clio and the economics of QWERTY," Amer. Econ. Rev., vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 332-337, 1985.
25. G. Unruh, "Understanding carbon lock-in," Energy Policy, vol. 28, pp. 817-830, 2000. (Pubitemid 30655029)
26. G. Weisbuch, V. Buskens, and L. Vuong, "Heterogeneity and increasing returns may drive socio-economic transitions," Comput. Math. Org. Theory, vol. 14, pp. 376-390, 2008.
27. N. Rosenberg, Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1982.
28. M. Frankel, "Obsolescence and technological change in a maturing economy," Amer. Econ. Rev., vol. 45, pp. 296-319, 1955.
29. M. Katz and C. Shapiro, "Network externalities, competition and compatibility," Amer. Econ. Rev., vol. 75, pp. 424-440, 1985.
30. K. Frenken, M. Hekkert, and P. Godfroij, "R&d portfolios in environmentally friendly automotive propulsion: Variety, competition and policy implications," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 71, pp. 485-507, 2004. (Pubitemid 38463355)
31. G. Unruh, "Escaping carbon lock-in," Energy Policy, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 317-325, 2002. (Pubitemid 34276401)
32. N. Rosenberg, Perspectives on Technology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1976.
33. J. Gómez-Ibáñez, As Time Goes by: From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 2003.
34. J. Markard, "Transformation of infrastructures: Sector characteristics and implications for fundamental change," J. Infrastruct. Syst., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 107-117, 2011.
35. G. Dosi, "Technological paradigms and technological trajectories," Res. Policy, vol. 11, pp. 147-162, 1982.
36. R. Kemp, P. Mulder, and C. Reschke, "Evolutionary theorising on technological change and sustainable development," OCFEB Research Memorandum 9912, Environmental Policy, Economic Reform and Endogenous Technology, Working Paper Series 2, 1999.
37. P. Saviotti, Technological Evolution, Variety and the Economy. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, 1996.
38. R. Nelson and S. Winter, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1982.
39. J. Lambooy, "Knowledge and urban economic development: An evolutionary perspective," Urban Stud., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1019-1035, 2002. (Pubitemid 34500226)
40. R. Boschma, K. Frenken, and J. Lambooy, Evolutionaire Economie. Bussum, The Netherlands: Coutinho, 2002.
41. K. Lancaster, Consumer Demand: A New Approach. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1971.
42. C. Harley, "On the persistence of old techniques: The case of North American wooden shipbuilding," J. Econ. History, vol. 33, pp. 372-398, 1973.
43. F. Geels, "Analyzing the breakthrough of rock 'n' roll (1930-1970): Multiregime interaction and reconfiguration in the multi-level perspective," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 74, pp. 1411-1431, 2002. (Pubitemid 47338185)
44. D. Bunch, M. Bradley, T. Golob, R. Kitamura, and G. Occhiuzzo, "Demand for clean-fuel vehicles in California: A discrete-choice stated preference pilot project," Transp. Res. Part A, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 237-253, 1993.
45. T. O'Garra, S. Mourato, and P. Pearson, "Analysing awareness and acceptability of hydrogen vehicles: A London case study," Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 649-659, 2005.
46. H. Koski and T. Kretschmer, "Survey on competition in network industries: Firm strategies, market outcomes, and policy implications," J. Ind., Compet. Trade, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5-31, 2004.
47. A. van de Ven, "Running in packs to develop knowledge-intensive technologies," Special Issue on Information Technologies and Knowledge Management, MIS Q., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 365-377, Jun. 2005.
48. C. Azar and B. Sandén,"The elusive quest for technology neutral policies," Environ. Innovat. Societal Transit., vol. 1, pp. 135-139, 2011.
49. J. Farla, F. Alkemade, and R. Suurs, "Analysis of barriers in the transition toward sustainable mobility in the Netherlands," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 1260-1269, 2009.
50. S. Bakker, H. Lente, and R. Engels. (2010, Apr.). 'Competition in a technological niche: The cars of the future. ISU Working Paper. [Online]. Available: http://www.geo.uu.nl/isu/pdf/isu1004.pdf.
51. F. Alkemade and R. Suurs, "Patterns of expectations for emerging sustainable technologies," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 448-456, 2012.
52. M. Dijk, "Innovation in car mobility. Co-evolution of demand and supply under sustainability pressures," Ph.D. dissertation, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 2010.
53. A. Grübler, The Rise and Fall of Infrastructures: Dynamics of Evolution and Technological Change in Transport. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag, 1990.
54. P.Aghion andP.Howitt,"Amodelof growth through creative destruction," Econometrica, vol. 60, pp. 323-351, 1992.
55. F. Malerba and L. Orsenigo, "Innovation and market structure in the dynamics of the pharmaceutical industry and biotechnology: Towards a history-friendly model," Ind. Corporate Change, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 667-703, 2002. (Pubitemid 34990158)
56. G. Moore, "Cramming more components onto integrated circuits," Electron. Mag., vol. 38, pp. 114-117, 1965.
57. B. Nagy, J. Farmer, J. Trancik, and Q. Minh Bui. (2011, Sep.). Testing laws of technological progress. Santa Fe Institute Working Papers. [Online]. Available: http://tuvalu.santafe.edu/bn/workingpapers/NagyFarmerTrancikBui.pdf
58. E. Mansfield, "The speed and cost of industrial innovation in japan and the united states: External vs. internal technology," Manag. Sci., vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1157-1168, 1988.
59. K. Arrow, "The economic implications of learning by doing," Rev. Econ. Stud., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 155-173, 1962.
60. T. Wright, "Factors affecting the cost of airplanes," J. Aeronaut. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 122-128, 1936.
61. F. Ferioli, K. Schoots, and B. van der Zwaan, "Use and limitations of learning curves for energy technology policy: A component-learning hypothesis," Energy Policy, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 2525-2535, 2009.
62. F. Geels and J. Schot, "Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways," Res. Policy, vol. 36, pp. 399-417, 2007. (Pubitemid 46436102)
63. P. Zeppini and J. van den Bergh, "Competing recombinant technologies for environmental innovation: Extending Arthur's model of lock-in," Ind. Innovat., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 317-334, 2011.
64. U. Wilensky, Netlogo. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 1999.