What do microtensile bond strength values of adhesives mean?

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 307-314

  Söderholm, Karl Johan ^a   Geraldeli, Saulo ^a   Shen, Chiayi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

FEA; Loading condition; Modulus of elasticity; Poisson s ratio; Von mises

Indexed keywords

DENTAL MATERIAL; RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PLIABILITY; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; ULTRASTRUCTURE; YOUNG MODULUS;

COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTIN; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; PLIABILITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84867868458     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: 17579988     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a22767     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aboushelib MN, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Dent Mater 2005;21:984-991.
2. Beer FP, Johnston ER, DeWolf JT. Mechanics of materials, ed 3. New York: McGraw Hill, 2001:452.
3. Coelho PG, Calamia C, Harsono M, Thompson VP, Silva NR. Laboratory and FEA evaluation of dentin-to-composite bonding as a function of adhesive layer thickness. Dent Mater 2008;24:1297-1303.
4. DeHoff PH, Anusavice KJ, Wang Z. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the shear bond test. Dent Mater 1995;11:126-231.
5. El Zohairy AA, de Gee AJ, de Jager N, van Ruijven LJ, Feilzer AJ. The influence of specimen attachment and dimension on microtensile strength. J Dent Res 2004;83:420-424.
6. Ghassemieh E. Evaluation of sources of uncertainties in microtensile bond strength of dental adhesive system for different specimen geometries. Dent Mater 2008;24:536-547.
7. Heintze SD. Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent 2007;9(suppl 1):77-106.
8. Kelly A, Macmillan NH. Strong Solids (Monographs on the Physics and Chemistry of Materials), ed 3. New York: Oxford University Press, USA, 1987.
9. Matinlinna J, Mittal KL: Adhesion aspects in dentistry. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2009.
10. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 1995;11:117-125.
11. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 1998;14:212-221.
12. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength - evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994;10:236-240.
13. Silva NR, Calamia CS, Harsono M, Carvalho RM, Pegoraro LF, Fernandes CA, Vieira AC, Thompson VP. Bond angle effects on microtensile bonds: a laboratory and FEA comparison. Dent Mater 2006;22:314-324.
14. Söderholm KJ. Dental adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:163-164.
15. Söderholm KJ. Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive restorative materials: a report of the ASC MD156 Task Group on Test Methods for the Adhesion of Restorative Materials. Dent Mater 1991;7:74-83.
16. van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 1989;17:61-67.