Optical Computing for Fast Light Transport Analysis

ACM Transactions on Graphics

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1-12

  O'Toole, Matthew ^a   Kutulakos, Kiriakos N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867866129     PISSN: 07300301     EISSN: 15577368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1882261.1866165     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Amano, T., and Kato, H. 2008. Real world dynamic appearance enhancement with procam feedback. Proc. IEEE PRO-CAMS.
2. Ambs, P. 2009. A short history of optical computing: rise, decline, and evolution. Proc. SPIE 7388.
3. Athale, R. A., and Collins, W. C., 1982. Optical matrixmatrix multiplier based on outer product decomposition.
4. Bai, J., Chandraker, M., Ng, T.-T., and Ramamoorthi, R. 2010. A dual theory of inverse and forward light transport. Proc. ECCV.
5. Basri, R., and Jacobs, D. 2003. Lambertian reflectance and linear subspaces. IEEE T-PAMI 25, 2, 218-233.
6. Casasent, D. 1981. Hybrid processors. Optical Information Processing Fundamentals, 181-233.
7. Cederquist, J., and Lee, S. 1979. The use of feedback in optical information processing. Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing.
8. Debevec, P., Hawkins, T., Tchou, C., Duiker, H.-P., Sarokin, W., and Sagar, M. 2000. Acquiring the reflectance field of a human face. Proc. SIGGRAPH.
9. Fuchs, M., Blanz, V., Lensch, H., and Seidel, H.-P. 2007. Adaptive sampling of reflectance fields. ACM TOG 26, 2 (Jun).
10. Garg, G., Talvala, E., Levoy, M., and Lensch, H. 2006. SYMMETRIC PHOTOGRAPHY: EXPLOITING DATA-SPARSENESS IN REFLECTANCE FIELDS. Proc. Eurographics Symp. Rendering.
11. Goodman, J. W. 2005. Introduction to fourier optics, 3rd edition. Roberts & Company Publishers.
12. Greenbaum, A., and Trefethen, L. N. 1994. Gmres/cr and arnoldi/lanczos as matrix approximation problems. SIAMJ. Sci. Comput. 15, 2, 359-368.
13. Grossberg, M., Peri, H., Nayar, S., and Belhumeur, P. 2004. Making one object look like another: controlling appearance using a projector-camera system. Proc. CVPR, 452-459.
14. Guilfoyle, P., and Stone, R. 1991. Digital optical computer ii. Proc. SPIE 1563, 214-222.
15. Gutknecht, M. H. 2007. Block krylov space methods for linear systems with multiple right-hand sides: an introduction. in Modern Mathematical Models, Methods and Algorithms for Real World Systems. 420-447.
16. Koenderink, J. J., and Van Doorn, A. J. 1983. Geometrical modes as a general method to treat diffuse interreflections in radiometry. J. Opt. Soc. Am 73, 6, 843-850.
17. Kumar, B. V. K. V., and Casasent, D. 1981. Eigenvector determination by iterative optical methods. Applied Optics 20, 21, 3707-3710.
18. Langer, M. 1999. When shadows become interreflections. Int. J. Computer Vision 34, 2, 193-204.
19. Leith, E. 2000. The evolution of information optics. IEEE J. Select Topics in Quantum Electronics 6, 6, 1297-1304.
20. Liesen, J., and Tichy, P. 2004. Convergence analysis of krylov subspace methods. GAMM Mitt. Ges. Angew. Math. Mech. 27, 2, 153-173 (2005).
21. Mahajan, D., Shlizerman, I., Ramamoorthi, R., and Belhumeur, P. 2007. A theory of locally low dimensional light transport. Proc. SIGGRAPH.
22. Matusik, W., Pfister, H., Ziegler, R., and Ngan, A. 2002. Acquisition and rendering of transparent and refractive objects. Proc. Eurographics Symp. on Rendering.
23. Ng, R., Ramamoorthi, R., and Hanrahan, P. 2003. All-frequency shadows using non-linear wavelet lighting approximation. Proc. SIGGRAPH.
24. Ng, T., Pahwa, R., Bai, J., Quek, T., and Tan, K. 2009. Radiometric compensation using stratified inverses. Proc. ICCV
25. Peers, P., and Dutr, P. 2003. Wavelet environment matting. Proc. Eurographics Symp. on Rendering.
26. Peers, P., and Dutr, P. 2005. Inferring reflectance functions from wavelet noise. Proc. Eurographics Symp. Rendering.
27. Peers, P., Mahajan, D., Lamond, B., Ghosh, A., Matusik, W., Ramamoorthi, R., and Debevec, P. 2009. Compressive light transport sensing. ACM TOG 28, 1.
28. Psaltis, D., and Athale, R. A. 1986. High accuracy computation with linear analog optical systems: a cricitcal study. Applied Optics 25, 18, 3071-3077.
29. Rajbenbach, H., Fainman, Y., and Lee, S. H. 1987. Optical implementation of an interative algorithm for matrix-inversion. Applied Optics 26, 6, 1024-1031.
30. Saad, Y. 2003. Iterative methods for sparse linear systems.
31. Salvi, J., Pages, J., and Batlle, J. 2004. Pattern codification strategies in structured light systems. Pattern Recogn 37, 4, 827849.
32. Schechner, Y., Nayar, S., and Belhumeur, P. 2007. Multiplexing for optimal lighting. IEEE T-PAMI 29, 8, 1339-1354.
33. Seitz, S., Matsushita, Y., and Kutulakos, K. 2005. A theory of inverse light transport. Proc. ICCV 1440-1447.
34. Sen, P., and Darabi, S. 2009. Compressive dual photography. Proc. Eurographics.
35. Sen, P., Chen, B., Garg, G., Marschner, S., Horowitz, M., Levoy, M., and Lensch, H. 2005. Dual photography. Proc. SIGGRAPH.
36. Simon, H. D., and Zha, H. 2000. Low-rank matrix approximation using the lanczos bidiagonalization process with applications. SIAMJ. Sci. Comput. 21, 6, 2257-2274.
37. Simoncini, V., and Szyld, D. B. 2003. Theory of inexact krylov subspace methods and applications to scientific computing. SIAMJ. Sci. Comput. 25, 2, 454-477.
38. Trefethen, L. N., and Bau, I. 1997. Numerical linear algebra. SIAM, xii+361.
39. Wang, J., Dong, Y., Tong, X., Lin, Z., and Guo, B. 2009. Kernel nystrom method for light transport. Proc. SIGGRAPH.
40. Wang, O., Fuchs, M., Fuchs, C., Davis, J., Seidel, H.-P., and Lensch, H. P. A. 2010. A context-aware light source. Proc. ICCP.
41. Wetzstein, G., and Bimber, O. 2007. Radiometric compensation through inverse light transport. Pacific Graphics, 391-399.
42. Zhang, L., and Nayar, S. 2006. Projection defocus analysis for scene capture and image display. Proc. SIGGRAPH.