Transanal near-infrared imaging of colorectal anastomotic perfusion

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 433-436

  Sherwinter, Danny A ^a  

^a MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

anastomotic leak; colorectal cancer; indocyanine green; ischemia

Indexed keywords

INDOCYANINE GREEN;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS; ANASTOMOSIS DEHISCENCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON RESECTION; COLORECTUM ANASTOMOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGING; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TISSUE PERFUSION; TRANSANAL NEAR INFRARED IMAGING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANAL CANAL; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; COLECTOMY; COLON; COLONOSCOPY; COLORING AGENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDOCYANINE GREEN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECTUM; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84867858811     PISSN: 15304515     EISSN: 15344908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182601eb8     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, et al. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1, 014 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:105-113.
2. Vignali A, Gianotti L, Braga M, et al. Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:76-82.
3. Novell JR, Lewis AA. Peroperative observation of marginal artery bleeding: a predictor of anastomotic leakage. Br J Surg. 1990;77:137-138.
4. Urbanavicius L, Pattyn P, Van de Putte D, et al. How to assess intestinal viability during surgery: a review of techniques. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;3:59-69.
5. Mordon S, Devoisselle JM, Soulie-Begu S, et al. Indocyanine green: physicochemical factors affecting its fluorescence in vivo. Microvasc Res. 1998;55:146-152.
6. Benya R, Quintana J, Brundage B. Adverse reactions to indocyanine green: a case report and a review of the literature. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989;17:231-233.
7. Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Andersson M, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis. 2004;6:462-469.
8. Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW. Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1719-1725.
9. Kudszus S, Roesel C, Schachtrupp A, et al. Intraoperative laser fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery: a non-invasive analysis to reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010;395:1025-1030.
10. Allison AS, Bloor C, Faux W, et al. The angiographic anatomy of the small arteries and their collaterals in colorectal resections: some insights into anastomotic perfusion. Ann Surg. 2010;251:1092-1097.
11. Karliczek A, Harlaar NJ, Zeebregts CJ, et al. Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:569-576.
12. Balacumaraswami L, Taggart DP. Intraoperative imaging techniques to assess coronary artery bypass graft patency. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:2251-2257.
13. Liu DZ, Mathes DW, Zenn MR, et al. The application of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in plastic surgery. Reconstr Microsurg. 2011;27:355-364.
14. Raabe A, Beck J, Gerlach R, et al. Near-infrared indocyanine green video angiography: a new method for intraoperative assessment of vascular flow. Neurosurgery. 2003;52:132-139.
15. Ahn H, Lindhagen J, Nilsson GE, et al. Evaluation of laser Doppler flowmetry in the assessment of intestinal blood flow in cat. Gastroenterology. 1985;88:951-957.
16. Gore RW, Bohlen HG. Microvascular pressures in rat intestinal muscle and mucosal villi. Am J Physiol. 1977;80:H685-H693.
17. Brolin RE, Bibbo C, Petschenik A, et al. Comparison of ischemic and reperfusion injury in canine bowel viability assessment. Gastrointest Surg. 1997;1:511-516.